ipl-logo

Violence In John Brown's Case Study

681 Words3 Pages

Violence should never come first in trying to make your point seen or heard. Social change such as an agreement without the use of violence can always be an option because no one can ever get hurt. Yet there 's also a line that should not be intersected. If someone uses violence on you, should you be able to use it back? Yes, but it only should be used to defend yourself such as if someone is threatening you and takes action physically you should too. As a child I asked myself many times if it were okay to defend myself from bullies by using violence. It came to a certain point where I had enough and had to use violence to show them I wasn’t their toy that they could pick on. Using violence was a good method to me because it got the message across to the bullies, that it wasn’t right for them to pick on someone. The only reason I used physical action towards the bullies was because talking to the bullies and telling them to stop was like talking to the wall. The selection …show more content…

As he says in his last speech it was never his intention to get people hurt as he did. The people that opposed to what John Brown was doing never gave him the opportunity to let him speak his mind. By speaking his mind he could have said that there had already been occasions where he had saved slaves without the use of violence. The effect on not letting him do so was that he felt using violence was the only was he could help save the slaves. Although John Brown knew that violence was not the way to back up his actions because he had saved many slaves without anyone getting hurt he did so anyway. The raid on Harpers Ferry was an event where John Brown and a few of his followers used violence for a cause that could benefit them. They tried to take items that could help form a slave rebellion. John Brown didn’t overuse the control of violence, he only did it to try and help the save get the freedom he thought they

Show More
Related

  • John Brown Persuasive Essay

    455 Words  | 2 Pages

    John Brown has made a point that defends him from being called a terrorist. Furthermore, in the article, Last Speech, John Brown says, “I never did intend murder, or treason, or the destruction of property, or to excite or incite slaves to rebellion, or make insurrection.” As a result of this speech this make Brown seem like a national because he says he never intended murder. Also Brown after this speech makes the government look like the bad guy and make his execution even more one sided. John Brown has claims against him that make him look as bad as a terrorist.

    Read More

  • How Did John Brown Led To The Demise Of The Pottawatomie Massacre?

    502 Words  | 3 Pages

    John Brown was an extreme abolitionist who wanted to end slavery. He was involved in the Pottawatomie massacre and helped lead the raid on harpers ferry. John Brown’s raid on Harpers Ferry was hoped to lead to a massive wave of abolishing slavery. Brown and his man attacked harpers ferry because he hoped to arm the slaves and lead a revolt against the south, because the ship was filled with US arsenal. John Brown thought that by leading a revolt against a US arsenal filled ferry and arming slaves, that he would cause a wave of revolts against pro slavery supporters that would eventually lead to the demise of slavery.

    Read More

  • The Federal Armory: The Murder Of John Brown

    330 Words  | 2 Pages

    On October 16, 1859, John Brown lead twenty-one men, made up of both white and black men, to attack a federal armory at Harper’s Ferry, Virginia. Brown’s plan was to steal weapons to give to freed slaves nearby and then return back to the mountains to do more raids to free more slaves. To do this, Brown and his men stopped man trains and took over many bridges to stop all people from coming in and stopping them. After this, Brown’ men got to the federal armory and took the weapons and captured hostages. John Brown thought that if the story got out about the weapons he stole, slaves would rebel against their slave owners and run away to meet him to join the fight.

    Read More

  • Who Was John Brown Insane For The Harpers Ferry Raid?

    474 Words  | 2 Pages

    John Brown was an abolitionist who was a part of the anti-slavery movement. He led the Harpers Ferry Raid in hopes to ignite a spark in slave uprisings. Brown was not insane for his plans of raiding and supplying slaves with guns from the arsenal. The plan for the raid was not a spontaneous attack.

    Read More

  • Civil War Dbq Essay

    869 Words  | 4 Pages

    This was not the only violent conflict between the Northern abolitionists and Southern farmers, as John Brown, a strong abolitionist, led a raid on Harpers Ferry in Virginia to try and spark a slave rebellion. In a political cartoon, Brown is shown as a hero and leader (Doc 4). But by many many southerners he was seen as insane, and as an aggressor for causing the deaths of multiple lives, adding on to the already high tensions in the

    Read More

  • John Brown Hypocrisy Analysis

    1391 Words  | 6 Pages

    This would end up helping the abolitionist movement. Like any martyr, he wanted to have powerful words that would inspire people. On the day of his execution, he handed his jailer a note. The note read, “I John Brown am now quite certain that the crimes of this guilty land will never be purged away but with Blood. I had as I now think, vainly flattered myself that without very much bloodshed it might be done (Marrin 136).”

    Read More

  • What Was The Reason For Territorial Disputes Between 1820 And 1860

    1024 Words  | 5 Pages

    While the Union’s argument may have been the side that most people would agree with, they were not right in their actions. John Brown, an abolitionist, hated slavery and his fury boiled over into intense violence. After the Sacking of Lawrence, when the south attacked a northern hotel, John Brown retaliated with the Pottawatomie Creek Massacre where he murdered five pro-slavery advocates. Brown later invaded the south and started arming slaves with weaponry to revolt against their owners. In the end, the slaves were re-captured and Brown was

    Read More

  • Was John Brown A Terrorist Or A Freedom Fighter

    326 Words  | 2 Pages

    He saw the wrong in owning slaves. He believed what he was doing and what he believed in was right not wrong. He was hung with the pleasure of knowing he made an impact on the world. John Brown tried very hard to do anything to please god and free slaves.

    Read More

  • John Brown's Raid

    298 Words  | 2 Pages

    "His Speech to the Court at His Trial, 1859" John Brown's raid made the north and the south argue and complain about each other and more than normal. The north didn't seem to care about Brown's actions because he was taking the matter of slavery into his own hands and his beliefs were the same as his. The south was livid! How dare he take their slaves! It was a complete disaster in there eyes; he was helping black slaves get out of the south and up into Canada to be free from their masters.

    Read More

  • Was John Brown A Hero

    697 Words  | 3 Pages

    Many people have no clue who John Brown was. John Brown was an American abolitionist who believed that slaves should be treated equally. John Brown was a white man who lived in the North and thought what was happening in the South would have to come to an end. Brown believed the only way to get rid of slavery in the South was violence. He brutally killed many slaveholders and their families in the South because they owned slaves.

    Read More

  • Why Is John Brown So Effective

    856 Words  | 4 Pages

    Brown justified his action by arguing that he used violence because others used violence as well. Brown stated something similar during his interview in Charlestown Prison. He said, “ I think I did right, and that others will do right who interfere with you at any time and at all times. I hold that the Golden Rule, "Do unto oth­ers as ye would that others should do unto you," applies to all who would help others to gain their liberty.” Here, Brown explicitly states that his actions were right by referring to the Bible.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast American Abolitionism And The Civil War

    620 Words  | 3 Pages

    Through this belief, he led an attack in Harpers Ferry, Virginia in the hopes of sieging the federal arsenal and sparking a revolt amongst the southern slaves (Zinn 168). Even though his attempts were futile, mainly due to small numbers and improper execution, Brown remained noble to his beliefs. This was proven in his refusal to surrender when his team was defeated (Zinn 168) and again right before his execution. Before Brown’s hanging, he reiterated his belief in the pursuit of blood shed to end slavery by writing “the crimes of this guilty land will never be purged away but with blood” (Zinn 169).

    Read More

  • The Assassination Of John Brown Essay

    445 Words  | 2 Pages

    In October 1859, the U.S. military arms stockpile at Harper 's Ferry was the objective of a strike by a furnished band of abolitionists drove by John Brown (1800-59).The attack was planned to be the first stage in an involved arrangement to build up an autonomous fortification of liberated slaves in the mountains of Maryland and Virginia. Brown was caught amid the attack and later sentenced conspiracy and hanged, however the strike kindled white Southern reasons for alarm of slave uprisings and expanded the mounting strain in the middle of Northern and Southern states before the American Civil War (1861-65). John Brown was Conceived in Connecticut in 1800 and brought up in Ohio, John Brown originated from a staunch Calvinist and abolitionist

    Read More

  • John Brown Abolitionists

    974 Words  | 4 Pages

    Through his writings, Brown tells us he had no doubt in his intentions being for the better, choosing to ignore these lives lost as they didn’t serve to further his cause. Scott John Hammond tell us about John Brown’s calculated nature by comparing him to Machiavellian philosophies, a philosophy associated with the use of power in often ruthless means, “Given the fact that all founders and reformers will inevitably encounter resistance from those enemies … Machiavelli notes that a lawgiver … must go forth armed and prepared for struggle” and “A founder is consonant with the idea of virtue, or grandeur of soul - a character of extraordinary proportions, defined in terms of “ingenuity, skill, and excellence.”

    Read More

  • Essay On What Caused The Civil War Dbq

    484 Words  | 2 Pages

    George Fitzhugh claimed that "The Negro slaves of the South are the happiest the freest people in the world." (Document H). John Brown a major person in the fight to end slavery "led a band of 18 men into Virginia to seize the federal arsenal there, distribute the captured arms to slaves in the area, and create a general slave uprising." (Document I).John Brown was executed and the aftermath of his death made tensions rise betwwen the North and South. "

    Read More

More about Violence In John Brown's Case Study

Open Document