We should be looking at the issue from many different angles instead of being restricted to a very narrow view of the matter. Hence, with regards to the methods to solve the conflict, it would be interesting to discuss its points such as ceasing conflict when it happens, setting the ground rules and strengthening team communication. (LIM MEI HOI, 1507923) First and foremost, it may be said without fear of contradiction that by stopping conflict when it happens in the
Additionally one needs to be in support of something, in favor of peace. Thus its necessary in peace studies not only to focus on the understanding and prevention of war, but also on the establishment of a desirable and attainable peace. Galtung says that for a society to be peaceful, in a positive
If turf wars, disagreements and differences of opinion escalate into conflict, we must intervene immediately. Not intervening is not an alternative if we value your organization and our positive culture. In conflict-ridden situations, we mediation skill and interventions are critical. In many events, effective conflict resolution skills can create the difference between positive and negative effects. The serious word is that by resolving conflict successfully, we can resolve many of the problems that it has got to the surface, as well as gain benefits that we might not at first expect, such every bit: • Increased understanding: The discussion needed to resolve conflict expands people 's awareness of the situation, taking heed to both parties about the incident and how to improve and prevent the issuance.
In light with this, the strength of the theory is that it offers a framework for the actors to step back and possibly link issues with larger structural problems within a society before an intervention or operation. Once these links are identified, it is easier to create a vision for the future that will make all the smaller issues irrelevant. Another way to look at the model is to see that fixing all the issues-specific conflict that manifest themselves within a society will not bring about progress in the strategic arena if the fundamental or systemic problems are not dealt with. Hence, in contrast to deterrence theory, this paper contends that nested theory is relevant as it accentuated that states should not simply focus on building armed forces and forming diverse alliances since this would simply bother the international order and would just hasten threats and clashes to conflicting parties. Or maybe, conflicts must be resolved at local level in order to avert bigger and more decimating
After a period of reflection, one should approach the opposing party and invite them to engage in conversation. In addition, rather than avoid bringing the issue up directly, be clear about what you want to discuss in order to ensure equal focus. There shouldn’t be any more escalation of whatever conflict has come to light: make sure to express the desire for a clean resolution of the issue. 2. Share perspectives a.
Does interpersonal contact improve relations among groups that are in conflict? This is the question that needs to be answered. Conflict will always be present when two groups have opposing views. However, this does not mean that the relations between groups should be damaged. For example, a couple may have arguments with each other, but in most cases they try to resolve the conflict as opposed to ending their relationship.
After comprehending the skills from nonviolent communication, we may then use and apply it for resolving a conflict. Yet, it is definitely easier said than done. However, we should not be cut short because of the challenges and frustrations that it may bring. Rather, we should confront the challenges and frustrations, and further expose our very true self freely and openly.
In addition, technology should not be used up to the point that invading individual privacy even for security purpose. Though national security as a whole might seem more crucial than privacy, the right of every individual should be considered as more important for several reasons. First and foremost, to prevent the existence of excessive totalitarianism. According to , if the individuals knew their actions are being observed, most of them find it much harder to do anything that stand apart and different from others (Solove, 2014). Then, they tend to follow the social norm and force themselves to live under control of dictatorship.
We need to use objective criteria if we want to agree on something without the will of either side. It is important to have some standards of efficiency and fairness. Referring to community practices and precedents makes the agreement “less vulnerable to attack”. Principled negotiation protects the negotiation process from a major threat – battle for
ARIS describes the human element of resistance which is a pivotal fact prior definitions would rather us to ignore. These non-violent or “Velvet” revolutions or resistance movements have been successful at achieving their objectives and should not be easily discarded. Something easily done with the previous view on resistance and conflict. Essentially, ARIS is drawing attention to the gradual transformation of a non-violent resistance into a violent resistance. Acceptance of this awareness in all forms should enable political and military leaders the necessary cues to intervene within a resistance at the optimal point in