A social worker being brutally gang raped in Rajasthan caused social activists and NGOs to file a petition, particularly with the aim of doing away with social injustice especially to women; which subsequently led to the judgment for the case of Vishakha v State of Rajasthan. This was the first of such judgments to lay down guidelines for protection of women at workplace, prior to which there had been no legislation laying down rules to ensure prevention of sexual harassment of women or safeguarding women’s rights against the same. The judgment, with a description of the acts that are to fall squarely within the definition of ‘sexual harassment’, inter alia states how there should be a spread of awareness of rights of female employees within …show more content…
Salmond defined a legal right as an interest protected and recognised by a rule of justice , further emphasising on the fact that ‘there can be no right without a corresponding duty’ . The Vishakha judgment talks about violation of art 14, 15, 19 and 21 of the Indian Constitution which confer to all Indians inalienable fundamental rights in the form of right to equality, prohibition of discrimination on grounds of sex, rights to freedom and right to life respectively; which cannot be taken away even by legislation. When an individual owns any of these rights, there originates a corresponding duty in others to allow the enjoyment of such rights and abstain from causing restrictions to the same, whereby, rights of one imply an absence of liberty in another to hamper the enjoyment of such rights . Sexual harassment of a woman at her workplace clearly indicates gender discrimination, thereby violation of art 14 of the Constitution. Furthermore, art 15 which guarantees no discrimination on the basis of sex also gets violated in the same light. The fundamental right of a person to ‘practise any profession, or to carry out any occupation, trade or business ’ remains unfulfilled under violation of art 19 (1) (g). Art 21 that guarantees right to live with dignity and right to safety under the ambit of right to life gets brutally violated when an individual does not get to work in a safe working environment. The basic individual right owned by one to protect one’s body from abuse gets violated owing to the absence of a legislation restricting such abuse. It is a part of the objective as well as a duty of the judiciary to ensure such violations do not occur; that such rights are successfully enjoyed by the owners. Accordingly, with a view to bridge such legislative gap, fulfil the judiciary’s objective and carry out such duty, the judgment puts forward a
The Tribunal Vice-chair’s decision to refuse Mrs. Ferjo’s previous adjournment was protected under The Statutory Powers Procedure Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.22. In addition the tribunal brought up the fact that Under Rule 13.1 of its Rules of Procedure, the Tribunal was able to dismiss an application that it had no jurisdiction over. Judicial immunity and judicial independence prohibited the tribunal of having the jurisdiction to review Mrs. Ferjo’s
Mohammad Haneef & Erosion of Civil Liberties Weland La ‘Australia’s laws are severely eroding civil liberties.’ Discuss this statement in light of the Haneef Case and one other issue (such as the right to silence, privacy, etc.), commenting on the extent to which the law balances the rights of the individual with the needs for community safety. In correlation with the Haneef Case, Australia’s laws are severely eroding civil liberties as demonstrated by NSW’s introduction of the Evidence Amendment (Evidence of Silence) Act 2013.
To begin with, in the judicial system, there is an ongoing dispute over what compromises the proper amount of judicial power. This lack of agreement concerning policymaking power of the Courts is bestowed within the discussion between judicial activism and judicial restraint. In general, these two philosophies represent the conflicting approaches taken by judges in their task of interpretation. Consequently, the Court’s decision could be framed in terms of activism or restraint by either changing or upholding public policy.
According to the act “everyone has the right to life, liberty, and security of the person, and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.” (The Charter of Rights and Freedoms 1982). Section 7 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms sets rights that protect us when dealing with the justice system. The charter ensures that “that individuals who are involved in legal proceedings are treated fairly, especially those charged with a criminal offence” (Section 7-14: Legal Rights). Finally, were the equality rights.
Is this Act only for the working women? No, this act is for all women who are harassed at the workplace. It can be any office or any type of workplace where the women is harassed. At every office a committee should set up rules that should be followed by all the workplace.
In the 1800s, slavery in the South was common. African Americans were treated so horribly that they got whipped and beaten as a punishment. They were even allowed to have basic human rights. Basic human rights include having the right to have freedom and control of yourself. For example, in Document 1: A Speech by Frederick Douglas (1850), it says "The law gives the master absolute power over the slave."
Today violence against women is an uncontrollable phenomenon, which is a direct result of the rapid urbanization, industrialization and structural adjustment programs which are changing the socio-economic scenario of our country. "Violence against women is a manifestation of historically unequal power relations between men and women, which have led to domination over and discrimination against women by men and to the prevention of the full advancement of women" (United Nations Declaration1993) Domestic violence has attracted much attention of the sociologists in India since the decades of 1980s. Violence affects the lives of millions of women, worldwide, in all socio- economic and educational classes. It cuts across cultural and religious barriers, threatening the right of women to participate fully in society.
The industrial era, one filled with great inventions, working employees on the rise and a new beginning. Along with great rising, came with it many conflicts. During this time period a variety of roles were played, even young children had a role. Amongst, the variety of roles played, the most important involved business leaders and the government. With change coming so rapidly as well as corruption, laws and acts were in desperate need at this time.
It is everyone’s responsibility to conform and follow legislation by adhering to laws such as health and safety and safeguarding. 3.1. Explain why conflicts may arise between the duty of care and an individual’s rights. Conflicts may arise between the duty of care and an individual’s rights as it’s finding the happy balance between the individual and the task at hand.
Analyse the impact on Aboriginal peoples human rights from government strategies implemented in both the 20th century and today Throughout Australia’s precious history, there has always been illogical discrimination against Aboriginals which continue to affect them both physically and emotionally. The modern, Australian Government, has attempted to address the perpetual inequality and curb the continual discrimination against Indigenous people by implementing various programs and policies. During the 20 th century, the Australian government formed policies and programs to direct the lifestyle of Indigenous people as non-indigenous people discriminated them as ‘unintelligent beings and uncivilised’. But recently in the early 21 st century,
Dworkin and Judicial Discretion, Philosophy of law, last accessed from http://www.yellowpigs.net/philosophy/dworkin on 02 April 2016 4. Dworkin, Ronald, (1977), Taking Rights Seriously, London,
Sexual harassment and sexual assault are very serious issues happening today in the workplace. Women or men have suffered from unsolicited sexual behaviors that are typically provoked by someone “higher” in position. “Sexual harassment especially has been a fixture in the workplace since women began to work outside their homes” (Fitzgerald, 1993). It is solely the responsibility of the employer to ensure that all employees within are aware and are very cautions of laws, misconduct, and liabilities. Employers must enforce the Policy Prohibiting Discrimination and further extend those laws and guidelines to their employees.
The law is an intriguing concept, evolving from society’s originalities and moral perspectives. By participating in the legal system, we may endeavour to formulate a link between our own unique beliefs and the world in which we live. Evidently, a just sense of legality is a potent prerequisite for change, enabling society to continue its quest for universal equality and justice. Aristotle once stated that "even when laws have been written down, they ought not to remain unaltered".
Sexual harassment is identified as any unwelcome and unwanted sexual advances, verbal or physical behavior of sexual nature and requesting for sexual favours due to which a worker’s performance is affected, he/she suffers from psychological trauma or an offensive/hostile atmosphere is created at the workplace. The occurrence of workplace sexual harassment is linked with several risk factors. The nature of job and particularly the gender ratio at a workplace and traditionally male oriented jobs are among the significant ones. These pose an increased risk for women to face situations of getting sexually offended or harassed.
According to the radical critique of law, how does law discriminate? Along with many other policies, the law also stresses on the discrimination which