There are many renowned historical figures in the time of the Medieval period, each leaving behind their impact and legacy. Two of these characters are Vladimir I (Vladimir the Great, Vladimir Svyatoslavich) and Kublai Khan. Both had struggles rising into power due to family lines, yet still managed to form unification and expand; the two had distinguished military reputations and strategies, also leaving an effect on the economy and their legacy. However, a few differences between the two include the religion and culture inflicted and the fall of their empires. Vladimir and Kublai Khan both had many achievements dealing with aspects of their empire and reputations and legacy, but also possessed differences in religion and declining …show more content…
There are many stories of the success of the two. Vladimir revived his father’s conquests and continue through to his own, producing a reputation that caught the attention of Emperor Basil II of the Byzantine who requested help for the civil unrest of is empire. Kublai Khan had success in the Mongol-Jin war, won the battle for the throne of the Mongol Empire, and conquered vast, prosperous territories in China and East Asia. The two rulers had inspiration from their fathers. Vladimir possessed an urge to complete the unfinished campaigns (his father’s campaigns stopped due to civil war) and used many of the same tactics to achieve success. Kublai Khan also put his father’s strategies to use, including the formation of troops, grouping and battle training, and ranged warfare. In addition to the prominent warfare success, the leaders put significant improvements to the economy. Vladimir implemented the use of coins for currency, and even though it was meant for political progress, the economy was affected in a positive way as well. Kublai Khan had two significant impacts on the economy; sending Marco Polo on exploration, and using paper money. Marco Polo’s explorations brought connections to other parts of the world, meaning more trade and a stronger economy. Paper currency was also a substantial change due to its efficiency. Vladimir and Kublai left …show more content…
They supported different religions and had different impacts on the fall of their empires. Vladimir is well known for his Christian faith, and it 's disperse, leading to the unification of the people. He, at first, followed paganism, going as far as producing idols for six Slavic gods. When he decided to change faiths, ambassadors were sent from different areas trying to convert him, leaning forward to his decision of Christianity (Catholicism/ Latin Orthodox). Kublai Khan also spread culture, but with the Asian religions. Being a Buddhist, he favored those who were like him and gave many encouraging benefits. This encouraged the spread of Buddhism and made it the common belief, although there were other religions. After Vladimir’s death, the control over Russia was divided among his children, splitting more and more as the family line flowed down. The division and separation led to instability causing Russia’s fall to the Mongols several hundred years later. A division was also the cause of the Mongol empire’s fall, but not in the same way. The Mongols split into Khanates due to its vast size before Kublai 's death. When Kublai Khan dies, these Khanates start producing conflict as each pursued their interests. Vladimir I and Kublai Khan were significant figures in their ways during the medieval times. Their stories start from similar aspects in rising to power due to family history, unification
The Mongols were people who had a reputation that left a mark on the world. The Mongols, initially led by Ghankis Khan and the rest of his family, expanded the Mongol empire all through Eurasia. The Mongols' way of life is nomadic with a strong military, but the way they believed was very clever with a normal belief system, but the way they carried it out was barbaric and bad. The Mongols' military tactics were smart, but it was obvious they played dirty.
Russia was left much different from before the invasion of the Mongols. One major example of Russia’s change was what Moscow became during the Mongol rule and after their rule had ended. Moscow had become a power house in Russia politically and economically. Moscow soon became the capitol of Russia and was a major trading location in Russia.
To begin with, politically, they had many similarities. They were both established by Turkic warrior groups. They also both had a monarchy.
Genghis Khan: Lord of the Mongols Genghis Khan didn’t just lead a powerful empire that conquered cities throughout Eurasia. The Mongolian attacks and conquering of cites wasn't all negative, it introduced an era of peace and success in Eurasia (Genghis 1). Genghis Khan is a very important historical figure because he influenced religions and civilizations in his empire, impacted safe trade and travel on the silk road, and his legacy is shown in the vast amount of his descendants that can be traced through DNA. Genghis Khan wiped out numerous powerful civilizations and influenced the spread of religions. Religions spread because the Mongols did not enforce any religions (Invasions).
Kublai Khan began his rule around the year 1260, replacing his older brother Qan Mongke. In 1276 Kublai had defeated Song China, and henceforth gained rights over
Both the Mongol Empire and the Soviet Union were empires that covered vast territories and brought diverse populations under their rule. However, in terms of secularism and multiculturalism, the Soviet Union can be considered to be more secular and multicultural compared to the Mongol Empire. The Mongol Empire was founded by Genghis Khan in the 13th century and covered a large portion of Asia, including China, Central Asia, and parts of Eastern Europe. The Mongols practiced a form of shamanism, which was the predominant religion in their homeland, but they also adopted elements of other religions, such as Islam and Buddhism, as they conquered new territories.
In the mid 13th century, the Mongols conquered large amounts of land as a result of having a great military ruler, Genghis Khan. He was responsible for setting up khanates all over Asia in order to conquer and control more land in a more efficient manner. With this system in place the Mongol Empire spread rapidly. The purpose of these khanates was to help control land when Genghis could not be there, their was too much land for one man to control. Genghis khan was known to be a very smart and ruthless leader.
The emperors of the Mongol Empire were wise while building cities. They knew that the people who lived in the Mongol Empire could have different nationalities and different religious thoughts. As a result, the architects built many religious worship buildings for multiple cultures. The Mongol emperors had prosperity
The Mongols were people who emerged from the vasts of Central Asia in the 13th century. Led by Genghis Khan, they rapidly conquered a vast empire that stretched from China to Eastern Europe. While the Mongols are often depicted as brutal conquerors, the documents provided offer a better view of their impact on the world. These documents include accounts of Mongol diplomacy, trade, and cultural exchange, as well as descriptions of their military campaigns. By examining these documents, we can gain a better understanding of the legacy of the Mongols and the ways in which they shaped the world we live in today.
The Mongol Empire was the largest contiguous empire in history occupying 12 million square miles of land in Central Asia (Lewis, p. 1, 2002). When looking at a map of the Mongol Empire it is clear that it grew rapidly as it initially occupied its existing neighbors in 1207 and then went on to conquer the neighboring nations, taking control of the rest of central Asia by 1227 (Document C). It was created and controlled by Temüjin, who adopted the title Ghenghis Khan, meaning universal leader, from 1206 up until his death in 1227 (Lewis, p. 1, 2002). To many people Genghis Khan was considered a genius for his military strategy which partially led to his overwhelmingly successful conquest, but to others he was considered a violent, illiterate
They also had a an advantage on people they battled because of their adaptability and horses. The Mongol rulers also traded with numerous areas. They valued trade because they could tax it and earn money. The Mongol rulers also had good communication throughout the kingdom by sending messages by horseback. The Mongols were also tolerant to different religions.
The Mongols had a great empire but they had a grave impact. They should be remembered for the destruction they caused. The destruction of the Mongols is found
That's why the Mongols were both powerful on the battlefield and as an empire together. “The Mongols did not find honor in fighting
Genghis Khan was able to conquer twice as much land as Alexander The Great, essentially 4,860,000 square miles, compared to Alexander’s 2,180,000. Although the argument of age and lifetime can be brought
They both conquered a great deal of land. Both of their father were assassinated by their enemies. They were both born into leadership/ royalty. Their fathers were both leaders of their land. Soon after their fathers were killed they became leaders to their land and people.