Presidential Election Being liked by the whole nation and having more total votes than any one else running doesn’t necessarily mean you will become president. You could be winning the American vote but not win the presidential election. Creating a chance for the loser in total votes to actually win the election. It is not impossible to not win the peoples vote but win the election. In fact, 4 out of the last 56 elections have had the outcome go towards the loser in votes but just won the right electoral votes.
The presidential election of 1800 presented strong candidates on both side, each uniquely qualified for the position and prepared to lead the United States in very different ways. The Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans both possessed strong campaigns with good arguments to sway voters to their side, however, almost every positive campaigning tactic meant to promote their party’s candidate was met with slandering of some kind from the other side. The dilemma of every voter at the time was to choose between a strong government to protect them, or choose to protect themselves. This was the dilemma of Timothy Tisdale. As said by Joanne Freeman, author of a published article on the election, “The presidential election of 1800 was an angry,
Homework Assignment 9 Due in week 10 and worth 30 points Suppose that there are two (2) candidates (i.e., Jones and Johns) in the upcoming presidential election. Sara notes that she has discussed the presidential election candidates with 15 friends, and 10 said that they are voting for candidate Jones. Sara is therefore convinced that candidate Jones will win the election because Jones gets more than 50% of votes. Answer the following questions in the space provided below: 1.
The electoral college is a process the founding fathers established in the constitution with the intent to create a safeguard between the population and the selection of a president, and to give extra power to smaller states. However, based on the information presented in the articles the electoral college should be abolished as it violates our right of political equality, and fails to represent a third, independent, party in any election. Although there are many reasons to abolish the electoral college, the principal reason to take action would be the result of an obvious violation of our right to be politically equal. As shown in the chart provided (Doc D) 12 of the lowest populated states and the District of Columbia have almost the
The system can outrule the popular vote—which means the people of America that voted for their Presidential candidate for election, would not get their “most-voted-upon President”. This is the biggest flaw, as it has happened at least three times in United States
Your vote doesn’t count. I realized the truth of this statement after a recent experience. Knowing the Hyde Park Municipal election draws closer, I work to complete my registration. My first time voting, I research the candidates and prepare my voter’s card. I become excited, when in reality, this preparation is in vain.
The Presidential Elections have started, which means that many Americans will have the opportunity to decided who will replace the current president of the United States, Barack Obama. There are many candidates running to become president of the United States in 2016 from both the democratic and the republican parties. Both parties have very interesting nominees such as Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders from the democratic party or Donald Trump from the republican party who vows to make “America Great Again.” Even though these candidates seem like interesting people to do a presidential report on because of their background or such outlandish plans , the candidate whom I have inclined for and decided to do my presidential report on and who
The Electoral College should be eliminated because people do not have a clear choice in choosing the next President. This research paper will be discussing how the Electoral College affected the results of the Election of 1824 between the candidates Andrew Jackson and John Quincy Adams, and the political turmoil caused by the rumor of a “corrupt bargain”. The “corrupt bargain” occurred when Henry Clay, who had a spot in the House of Representatives, convinced the House of Representatives to elect John Quincy Adams. After John Quincy Adams was named the winner of the election, even though he had the least amount of electoral votes and popular votes, Henry Clay became his Secretary of State. After this, many Andrew Jackson supporters declared
Since the founding of America in 1776 countless people have either become disenfranchised by the federal government or backed the government. From laws being passed to decisions being made there will always be a division amongst the American people. Whether arguing over gun laws or citizenship rights, the debate is always there and met with some form of counter argument from either side. What makes America so great is the fact that you have the right to have a voice and speak out for your opinions. One of the greatest ways for a citizen to be heard is voting.
The Electoral College was made because the first leaders did not want a government where only the majority of its people ruled. They thought that it would be unfair. They believed that a pure democracy would destroy the country. There are two parts in the voting process. The first part is democratic.
Dissolving the electoral college and instituting a voting system where every citizen’s vote count, could allow for third party members to finally have a strong chance of being a primary candidate for election. This may allow America’s voice to be heard better if everyone had a say in the election. For the most part, Americans have only two choices the primary, Democrat and the Primary Republican, but without the electoral college a lesser candidate that might not be backed with a substantial amount of monetary wealth could win. Finally, a state may be Republican or Democratic, but there are still citizens voting against the majority in the state. Those citizens don’t have say as of right now, but if the electoral college was done away with
In Document G, show us a Chart in which depicts that the candidate who wins the popular vote never wins the electoral vote. So, the candidate who receives more votes from the public never wins the presidency. So, why even campaign if the goal is to win less votes than your opponent so you don’t win the popular vote but win the presidency? In Document A, it shows us that any candidate could win the 270 votes by winning only eleven states. These eleven states are; California (55), Texas (38), New York (29), Florida (29), Pennsylvania (20), Illinois (29), Ohio (18), Michigan (16), Georgia (16), North Carolina (15), and New Jersey (14).
Many Americans hold the philosophy that they are drops of water in an endless ocean, so what’s the point in voting? The answer is, there is power in numbers. Every vote adds up. In 2000, President George W. Bush won by only 537 votes.
Voting could be considered the most prestigious principle for the definition of democracy. The ability to vote for an official, governor, representative, or president has been a cherished one and has kept the powerful in check by giving the power to the people. In this modern generation, voting is not considered a privilege, it is a right, but there are devious loopholes in the fallible laws that have violated the rights of the majority of citizens. These loopholes have given the power of choice back to the hands of the powerful, and they do so through covert methods, some thought out and created by the founding fathers themselves. The fault rightfully shifts to the Electoral College.
The Electoral College is the process to which the United States elects the President, and the Vice President. The founders of the Constitution came up with this process. This was done to give additional power to the small states, and it was done to satisfy them. It works by the citizens of the United States electing representatives called electors. Each state is given the same amount of electors, as they are members of congress.
The term Web 2.0 depicts the second era of the World Wide Web (WWW), which emphases more on the capability of people to cooperate and share information online as opposed to the first web version, where people were primarily acquiring information. In US, the most prevalent Web 2.0 technologies are the Social Network Sites (SNSs) like Twitter, Facebook, Google+, LinkedIn, etc. Completely 45% of cell phone holders utilize a social networking site and 28% do as such on a common day (Ames, 2014). Youngsters who are highly sophisticated and those with a higher yearly family salary are more to be expected to use SNS on their phones. The increase of social media in the mid-2000s is the measure that enabled candidates, with the help of the Internet to associate with voters.