INTRODUCTION
Apple vs. Samsung lawsuit began on April 15, 2011 when Apple filed an infringement case on Samsung for copying its technology and design. Apple filed a case in US District against Samsung for copying Apple’s Innovative technology, distinctive user interfaces and elegant and distinctive product and packaging design, in violation of apple’s valuable intellectual property rights. Apple initiated the fight and Samsung took it globally in Germany, USA, Japan, Australia, South Korea and European Union.
Apple and Samsung share a buyer-seller relationship with each other, Samsung being the world’s largest memory chip maker and Apple is the largest consumer of flash memory. Apple buys flash memory from Samsung for its iPhone and iPad.
…show more content…
Apple then added more claims, stating Samsung copied the “look and feel” of the Apple iOS range of devices, naming Galaxy line of smartphones and tablets. In two separate lawsuits, Apple accused Samsung of infringing on three utility patents (United States Patent Nos. 7,469,381, 7,844,915, and 7,864,163) and four design patents (United States Patent Nos. D504, 889, D593, 087, D618, 677, and D604, 305). Apple was seeking $2.5 billion in damages, and Samsung was also seeking financial restitution. Among the patents Apple accused Samsung of infringing upon is Design Patent US D504889, which is a single page document with nine accompanying images of an unnamed electronic device in the shape of a rounded rectangle. Countering to the lawsuit, Samsung alleged that Apple infringed number of patents of Samsung that deals with iPhone 3G. Samsung accused Apple of infringing on United States Patent Nos. 7,675,941, 7,447,516, 7,698,711, 7,577,460, and 7,456,893. One 2005 design patent at the heart of the dispute is the Design Patent 504,889, which consists of a one-sentence claim about the ornamental design of an electronic device, accompanied by nine figures depicting a thin rectangular cuboid with rounded corners.
On August 24, 2012, the first trial of the Apple vs. Samsung case took place. In the trial, the jury found that Samsung had wilfully infringed Apple’s design, patents and trade dresses. The verdict was given in favour of Apple. An amount of $1.049 billion was given to Apple in damages. On the other hand Samsung received zero damages for its counter suit. Samsung had infringed Apple’s patents on iPhone’s “Bounce-Back Effect”, “Tap to Zoom”, “On-screen Navigation”, “On-screen Icons” and design patents. The
Yesterday, Sloan Jackson, age 18 was put on trial for stealing a shirt from Famous Fashions in Merchandise Mall. He supposedly ran out of the store with a lump (which was the same color as the stolen shirt) in his jacket to go to Record Mart because there was a big sale going on. He then was found sitting next to the yogurt stand and the shirt was found in a trash barrel near the yogurt stand. He then ran away from the security guard but he was in the end caught and brought back to the store to return the shirt. At the trial yesterday the jury came to a verdict of being guilty after talking in the jury room for about 10 minutes.
In the case of Riley V. California, Mr. Riley was stopped on a traffic violation, which led to his arrest on weapons charges. The officer searching Riley’s incident to arrest seized a cell phone form Riley’s possession. There was information on the phone and repeated use of a term associated with a street gang. Hours later a gang detective examined the phone’s digital contents and based in part on photographs and videos found, the State charged Riley in connection with a shooting that occurred a few weeks earlier. They sought an enhanced sentence based on Riley’s gang membership.
In the retrial, the jury again favored for
Once someone steps in the court room to oversee a trial of this caliber (or any caliber) they must not and will not let the media dictate their perspective of events. Scott Peterson’s jury saw the burden of proof provided by the prosecution and were left with no doubt in their minds by their own deductions he was guilty. The Casey Anthony jury on the other hand took all of the evidence into consideration, but they still were not completely convinced she was capable of the charges being filed against her, leaving them no other decision but to provide a not guilty
Coca-Cola Co. v. Koke Co. of America, 254 U.S. 143 (1920) U.S. Sup. Ct. Facts: 1886 marked the invention of a caramel-colored soft drink created by John Pemberton. Coca-Cola got its name after two main ingredients, coca leaves and kola nuts. The Coca-Cola Company is suing Koke Company of America from using the word Koke on their products. They believe Koke Company of America is violating trademark infringement and is unfairly making and selling a beverage for which a trademark Coke has used.
The prosecution did not prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt; thus, justice was not served for the real victim, Caylee. Although Casey Anthony won in a court of law, she lost in the court of public opinion; thus, being punished by society just as OJ was. References Anthony v State of Florida Case No. 5D11-237 (FL Dist. 5 Ct.
This trial was viewed as an opportunity to challenge the authority of the law and to publicize the accuracy
They settled the issue with a financial settlement there was never a proper case. The agreement of the financial settlement was 350,000
Pleading the Fifth Technology seems to come hand in hand with modernity. It has made most tasks that used to take days to complete much easier. Technology has also improved the channels of communication. The invention of the modern day smart cellphone coupled with social media networking has allowed mankind to be in constant contact with one another from across the globe.
While others may disagree. In legal history there are many cases where an unjust verdict is apparent. One case that has been infamously known to have an incorrect verdict is the case of The people V.S Oj Simpson. This criminal trial is one of the
All the jurors except Juror 3 had been convinced he was no longer guilty, even though the evidence displays it as such. After much debate juror number three says,”All right. ‘Not guilty’ ”(72). All the testimonies and evidence given by the court had been proven wrong by the jury. This shows major flaws in the justice system and it shows how reasonable doubt is found.
Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932) History: Powell v. Alabama was a Supreme Court decision where nine African-American males on a train were accused of raping two young Caucasian-American women. This situation sparked an altercation between the African-American men on the train and a few other white males. After being taken into custody, the Black men were not given the right to counsel upon request, and initially (besides one individual) sentenced to death. Facts: in Scottsboro, Alabama during the year 1932, nine young African-American males better known today as the Scottsboro Boys proceeded to board an empty train that was preparing to travel through Alabama.
(Miladinovic, Z., & Lukassen, J., 2015, February 25) The outcome of a just trial and its verdict, is based on proof of evidence, which ensures what 's best for the
At the end of this case, the court had this to
Conclusion Summary + personal opinion. The Apple Samsung Showdown