Wake Forest Law Case Summary

280 Words2 Pages
Generally LARRY E. RIBSTEIN & ROBERT R. KEATINGE, RIBSTEIN AND KEATINGE ON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES § 1:2 (2d ed. 2011). David L. Cohen, Theories of the Corporation and the Limited Liability Company: How Should Courts and Legislatures Articulate Rules for Fencing the Veil, Fiduciary Responsibility and Securities Regulation for the Limited Liability Company?, 51 OKLA. L. REV. 427, 429 (1998) (discussing the significance of the LLC in Delaware). WILLIAM MEADE FLETCHER, FLETCHER CYCLOPEDIA OF THE LAW OF CORPORATIONS § 18 (2012). Rugani D. TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY EQUITY: TAILORING THE CORPORATE VEIL PIERCING DOCTRINE TO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES IN NORTH CAROLINA. Wake Forest Law Review [serial on the Internet]. (2012, Fall2012), [cited August 7, 2015]; 47(4): 899-920. Available from: Business Source Complete.…show more content…
Piercing the Corporate Veil of an Alien Parent for Jurisdictional Purposes: A Proposal for a Standard that Comports with Due Process. California Law Review [serial on the Internet]. (2008, June), [cited August 7, 2015]; 96(3): 731-763. Available from: Business Source Complete. David Aronofsky, Piercing the Transnational Corporate Veil: Trends, Developments, and the Needfor Widespread Adoption of Enterprise Analysis, 10 N.C.J. INT 'L L. & COM. REG. 27, 57 (1985). John D. Gleissner, David C. Veeneman, & S. Rodgers Wheaton, Obtaining Personal Jurisdiction Over Alien Corporations—A Survey of U.S. Practice, 9 VAND. J. TRANSNAT 'L L. 345, 346-47 (1976). Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462, 475-76 (1985); World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286, 297-98 (1980). Mathews v, Diaz, 426 U,S, 67, 77-78 (1976); Wells Fargo & Co, v. Wells Fargo Express Co, 556 F, 2d 406, 416 n,7 (9th Cir, 1977); Velandra v. Regie Nationale Des Usines Renault, 336 F, 2d 292, 294 n,7 (6th Cir,
Open Document