To sum up, the movie isn’t identical to the book, although they are quite similar. It can be shown through the protagonist, the plot and the characters. As a matter of fact, Ken Kesey, the author of the novel, refused to watch the movie after its release. Many think it’s probably because of the all the differences between the movie and the book. He’s right to say that the movie doesn’t portray the book really
There lives were very limited and structured. They did not read a lot of books meaning they could not gain a lot of knowledge. The Puritans did not celebrate any holidays such as Christmas, for example. In Miller’s essay, it says that kids must be treated as adults.
Over a period of time people change. From how they raise kids, to what seems appealing to watch on television. With how Walt Disney likes to produce his movies with happy endings. Where everything ends just how the main characters want it to be. Not old are they appropriate, these movies give young children but they’re not violent or sexual.
Jay Asher answers this question by saying, “No because every reader is different. There’s no book that’s inappropriate for every person, but there are people who cannot handle everything.” Nobody will have the same mindset about everything and people need to understand this. According to Ray Bradbury on page 2 of Fahrenheit 451 it reads, “While the books went up in sparkling whirls and blew away on a wind, they turned dark with burning.” Firemen in this society burn books to keep people from reading the knowledge inside.
This allows someone who can identify one knight to be able to identify all the knights. In the novel, Twain presents this unifying standard between the armored knights as being slow minded and failing to think for oneself or thick cleverly. Since the very first time that Hank is around the knights, he notes that “There did not seem to be brains enough in the entire nursery, so to speak, to bait a fish-hook with; but you didn't seem to mind that, after a little, because you soon saw that brains were not needed in a society like that” (22). Twain adds this quotation to exploit the idea that since a monarch government lacks a variety of representation, the government hierarchy such are a unified group all simple minded and do not have to think for themselves. Twain illustrates the inefficiency of the knights’ unified thoughts and actions in Hank’s jousting matches.
More often than not, movies based upon novels are disappointing when the two are compared. Readers of James Dashner's The Scorch Trials are most likely appalled at how little the movie follows along with the book. The readers go in expecting to finally see the interpretation of the story they had previously experienced in their heads, only to be let down by how many of their favorite chapters were left out. The dripping metal ball scene, the "safe haven," and the lack of romance between Teresa and Thomas are just a few of the reader's favorite parts from Dashner's book that were cut from Wes Ball's movie adaptation. First, the dripping metal ball scene is left out entirely.
Multiple people found it difficult to watch and pay attention to this movie because of the lack of emotion, effort, and the horrible acting. Because of these reasons and more, it proves that the film produced in the year 2000 was less thankful and appreciative of the work Fitzgerald had done. The 2013 movie was better in the idea of assuring that the actors were proud of the character they were to portray. Since there was hardly any effort and emotion put into the filming of the first big screen, this helped to show that the director cared little about the actual story.
Ashwini Patel The Great Gatsby Synthesis Essay When novels are being translated into movies, the meaning can often get lost in translation. The depth that the novel has to it can often be lost in the movie. The movies are translated by directors and producers for the entertainment of the public, but a book is all the author’s creativity put onto paper.
Richard Williams prooved in “The animators survival kit” that this new technique had a great impact on the development of character design. By showing an image of an old and young women, tracing the shapes of various features he explains how they can be transfered to an animated character to inform us about their condition and age. In another example Williams traces the walk of a woman and a men, noticing the key differences in their motion. Power, strenght, confidence, dynamic of a character can be suggested just by the way of walk.
There are many reasons as to why, but all have a main principle, the original copy still exists for people to read. Although the more modernised movies may have changed the message to help draw in more people and make more money, the original text still exists and people can read that if they want the original meaning they can read the original. The new ones still contain the same core meaning only the way the meaning is conveyed was changed. Finally, the elements that were changed did not have a very big impact on the play as the modern versions are still used in schools to show the meaning of Macbeth and making it easier to understand for the students. For example the movie ShakespeaRE-Told Macbeth in the Kitchen, is used to show the meaning of Macbeth in a more understandable way for the
Now you know why the book and movie of Ender’s Game are so different and why the book is better. The movie adds unnecessary parts to it like ender when Ender had gotten tranquilized. It takes out many important parts in the movie like when Ender goes to salamander army. It even uses some important parts, but switches important things like dialogue, action, and even points of time.
The Learning of The Holocaust The book Night by, Wiesel represented the holocaust. The book was a great way of expressing facts but it was hard for me to really see it. I think that the movie, The Boy In The Striped Pajamas explained the holocaust much more efficiently, and had a better understanding of emotion and gave the watcher a better visual for better comprehension.