Leina Alley Mrs. Juhas Hour 1-2 2/10/23 Murder By Monster C.R. Bitter once said, “I was never the one who believed in monsters. Until I was proven, by humans, that they exist.” Steve Harmon, a 16 year old, is on trial for robbery and murder in New York City. Steve Harmon was a caring and kind person, but the monster in him pushed onto the world, and he couldn’t overcome it. This turned Steve Harmon into a monster. In the novel, Monster, by Walter Dean Myers, Steve Harmon was a monster because he doubts himself and he lied. Steve Harmon was a monster because he doubts himself. In this story, part is given through a journal perspective. Steve writes his emotions and part of what is happening through his journal, and here he explains the doubt …show more content…
When Steve testifies, he lies about many things. One of the few is about if Steve was in the drugstore, which from past journal entries, we know he was, but Steve says he wasn’t. The author wrote, “‘I don’t know exactly when the robbery happened, but I know I wasn’t in the drugstore that day.’” (Myers 229). When Steve says this, he is lying. We know from his journal entries that he was in the store, supposedly looking for some mints that day. Steve says this during court, and he is under oath, making him not allowed to lie. Steve is old enough to know that there is no exception to lie under oath, and he still decides to. Any person that thinks they can lie under oath is a terrible monster. Steve would be in even bigger trouble if they found out he was lying, and this makes him a monster and bad person. Also, Steve writes this in his journal, explaining that he did in fact walk into the drugstore. Steve has combated this multiple times, saying he did and did not go into the drugstore, and lied about it. The book says, “Anybody can walk into a drugstore and look around.” (Myers 115). This explains that Steve had gone into the drugstore before the crime, and could have inspected for police. Since Steve did this, he was a big part in the crime, and is a bad person. He was involved with the murder of Mr. Nesbitt, and because he helped with such a big part in committing the crime, that makes him a monster. Steve says later on …show more content…
Throughout the entire case, there was not enough evidence given for the jury to prove him guilty. Lorelle Henry was a person that witnessed part of the crime, and even said she never saw Steve in the store. With all of the evidence given, there was not enough for Steve to be found guilty and not be a good person. However, just because Steve was found not guilty doesn’t mean he was innocent. Therefore, Steve was a monster. Steve was a monster because he is friends with bad people. When Steve is talking to Osvaldo in a flashback, one of the people with him talks about Steve’s friends. The author wrote, “‘You better chill; he hangs with some bad dudes.’” (Myers 81). When the boy says this, he is explaining Steve’s friends. His friends are very bad people, and do bad things. So, their behavior gets put onto him because he hangs out with him. This further explains that the people you hang out with show how you act and your personality. This is more believable than Steve being not guilty because he knew about the crime. Saying Steve is a good person is saying he was not at all involved with the crime, but through all of the evidence we’ve seen, we can prove that completely wrong. This makes Steve a monster because he was associated with the people that murdered someone, and he knew about the crime as well, which makes him a
There was a lack of evidence to convict Steve guilty. Others have shown Steve's lack of guilt through their actions. On the night of the robbery and murder, there was no proven statement Steve was at the convenience store. He was caught up with the wrong people at the wrong time.
Murderers are evil, and it is imperative that the criminal justice system works against them, but it is just as important for them to work honestly and fair. Walter Dean Myers titled his book Monster. The book is about a sixteen-year-old boy, Steve Harmon, who is on trial for felony murder. A monster is what they called him, evil and malignant.
Steve is 16 years old and lives in Harlem, New York. Steve is a good person because he cares, loves, and wants the world to be better. In the novel, Monster, by Walter Dean Myers, Steve Harmon was a good person because he was not guilty, and he cares for others. Steve Harmon was a good person because he was found not guilty.
He admits on camera that there was a sexual relationship between him and Susan. Steve wrote songs about her, would try and record her, or take pictures of her, and said he was very aroused by her presence. He would save personal items used by Susan and take things of hers that could be considered revolting. Although, it was recorded that Susan had no interest in him and wanted him to stop. Steve was eventually investigated and convicted of child pornography.
Steve Harmon is a kid who is on trial for being a part of a robbery and murder. He lives in Harlem; New York and he is also only 16 years old. In the novel, Monster, by Walter Dean Myers, Steve Harmon was a monster because he lied and he doubts himself. Steve was a monster because he lied to the jury and said that he wasn’t in the store that day. Steve is in jail waiting on his trial for robbery and murder.
Although you might wonder why I mentioned the money saying he might have participated, the main reason they committed the crime was for money. So why did Steve not get paid? I am writing this essay to prove that Steve correctly proved his innocence to the judge and juries. The first major evidence is that Lorelle Henry did not witness Steve in the store while she was there.
In the novel, Monster, by Walter Dean Myers, 16- year- old Steve Harmon is placed on trial for felony murder. Steve tries to prove his innocence to the jury and he is found not guilty. Therefore, he is acquitted of any crime. However, Steve’s contradicting thoughts make the reader question his innocence.
According to Bobo and what we’ve seen from Steve’s flashbacks he was supposed to be the lookout. This would mean that Lorelle Henry would’ve seen Steve in the store, and Steve seeing her. There was no mention of Steve throughout her entire testimony which leads to the possible conclusion that Steve was never there on that day, leading to him being not
` In our world today, people make the wrong decisions. Some learn and some don’t. This is the story of Steve Harmon from the book, Monster ,and why he’s on trial for felony murder. Steve is accused of being the look out in a robbery that took place at a corner store in New York, where a murder occured. Harmon was the lookout not because he had to be ,but because he didn’t have a choice.
In the courtroom Steve had some troubles with a lot of racism and prejudice. Steve decided to go on the stand to prove his point otherwise they wouldn't believe him and the task wasn’t that easy but somehow he managed. The jury saw him through and he was claimed not guilty. His lawyer O’Brien wasn’t that happy in fact we think that she thought he was actually
If he had to fight with the one who had been his family, he would. He was different, now, he had long brown hair and looked thinner. When Steve did what he had to do, went to help the ex soldier that had been trapped under a column that had fallen because the explosions.
Steve Harmons actions depicted his characteristics and we can, therefore, conclude that Steve Harmon is a liar as he lied under oath. Steve was also a guilt-ridden man ashamed of his actions. People who disagree may claim that Steve was undoubtedly innocent as Lorelle Henry, a witness, declared that there were only 2 people, proven to be James King and Bobo Evans, inside the store who eventually murdered Mr.Nesbitt. This may be a strong argument because it shows that Steve was not in the drugstore and could be really innocent. On the contrary, however, Steve’s job was just supposed to be a lookout and ensure that the drugstore was clear of cops or anyone inside.
Your Eloquence Engine Trial ends on 29 March 2018 - Subscribe to GradeProof Pro Monster Conflict Essay: Innocence vs. Guilt The definition of a “monster” is a threatening force. In Walter Dean Myers’ Monster, Steve Harmon the defendant in the trial is being charged for felony murder. The monster in him is the struggle between his innocence and guilt.
Mr. Sawicki was in court talking about Steve. The author wrote, “‘He’s very much involved with depicting his neighborhood and environment in a positive manner.”’ (Myers 235). It proves he is a good person because he is saying very positive things about them. He likes talking about them and probably they are his friends.
Walter Dean Myers’s Monster is an experimental novel written in the form of a film script by its main character, Steve