War Against Terrorism Essay: The War Against Terrorism

him as an example after all he is also a human being? Is it not against morals? Now because of introduction of new kinds of terrorist activities, neither defense nor deterrence through threatened reprisal could be relied on to counter the new terrorist threat. But just because of this, you can’t delay, i.e. you cannot delay taking decisions because they are the most important part and not only decisions you should take decisions on time so that proper actions are taken on time. Taking proper decisions followed by actions also acts as a self defense which for some is very important for a state. This is a situation in which we can say that a state did not wait until an attack. But the question is, is it fair? The answer to this might be that

With the developments, a new technique to interrogate is also introduced because extracting such information from terrorist suspects is the top new priority. To counter this new threat a new method of interrogation was introduced called “counter-resistance technique”. This does not include physical torture or physical violence but only includes deep interrogation. E.g. stress positions, isolation for 30 days etc.This was initially introduced in the Guantanamo bay but then was accepted widely by everyone else also.

The main question is not about the degree of torture but is it really fair? The question is again about morality and justice. Whether torturing anybody is justified or moral, may it be anyone? Whether torturing someone, may it be lite-torture or may it be a harsh one humane? According to me torture of any kind should be forbidden. It’s against morality and it we see through the perspective of consequentionalist then even its consequences are not good, it only leads to painful suffering mentally and physically. Torture therefore, in any circumstances should not be made legal because firstly it’s not good for the people going through it and moreover many-a-times innocent people come in its