So, go out and spread the message that there are other ways of achieving things than extremism. It is unwise to expect all people everywhere to end their practices that have been going for thousands of years, but hopefully more people will begin to see extremism as a epidemic on the world and discourage others from going on this path. Overall, extremism hurts the world and hopefully will be ended in the
United States and congress must realize the power that lies in their hands. As president Obama stated, taking action is the most important initiative that can lead to change, and regardless of modern politics it must be done. History can hurt the lives of many but using the past to prevent the future is critical to protect the lives of many adults and children. While it is impossible to go back in time, understanding the contributing factors will assure the same events don't repeat itself. This is critical for the safety and security of younger generations.
According to the poem, people did not just go to war for the sake of it. However, they went to the battlefield to protect and defend their flag, protect their citizens, and to achieve patriotism while at war. The moral requirement of the war made it clear that it was fine to attack the country that waged war against the other. Similarly, the moral nature of the war did not allow the people to attack others aimlessly. Unlike modern times when war could be waged by a small group of people launching terror attacks on the country or community, they had a vendetta for peace.
You tie your happiness in life with your relationship. If you’re unhappy, you blame it on the relationship. In this stage, you start comparing your relationship with other couples and other relationships. Would your relationship survive this stage?
Thomas Nagel brings up the point that many people have an “natural conception of the distinction between fighting clean and fighting dirty” (Nagel 125). This distinction extends to war as well. It is intuitive that during wartime, warring parties should not be able to go to extreme lengths to further their cause. Though morality does shift during wartime, there are certain boundaries that cannot be crossed by the groups at war. What exactly these boundaries are, and how to enforce them, is a source of controversy.
By adopting this method as the only major way of study, scholars are abandoning their rights to be a human. Additionally, if students get used to this kind of dehumanizing method, it is more likely that those people will be unconcern, indifferent or even contemptuous towards warfare. War may appear to them as no more than a political rivalry, a number games, or a business conflict. Moreover, because they distant themselves from the blood and fresh contest and the life-and-death scenario, they may be more easily to wage a new war, and this is problematic and
Thus from seeing all this I personally believe that this all phenomenon as whole is creating or generating inhumanity kind of feeling in all people. People are restricting themselves from exploring in various beneficial fields in order to save their lives. In a context to this economic instability, destruction, and crisis that has taken in place in the world. Till it is not too late if they understand and do a compromise on the basis of humanity they can settle the war and can bring back the good environment.
Sometimes life can come in and put you into a situation you never chose to be in which can ruin a lot of things for you. As people we should be more open minded and caring instead of shutting these people out. A man who is passionate about his country should not have his voting rights completely stripped because he made one mistake in his life. The whole population should not overlook this issue because it can happen to anyone and before we decide to care, it may be too late. Even when told to follow orders in a certain way, it seems to get more strict as we go.
Bernhardi believes war creates growth and innovation for nations while James argues that if war can be avoided then it should be. In a way they both agree that war cannot be done away with completely due to human nature and would only not exist in a utopian society for William James. To finish up on their perspectives of war it wraps around to Bernhardi advocating that war in the right situations is important to advance a nation while William James would rather stay out of war until it is absolutely necessary. After reading and writing this report, both of these authors provide solid points that I personally believe in but Bernhardi’s ideas are more inline with mine. All in all war is a controversial topic with multiple sides all forming their own solutions but with Bernhardi and William James we can see two opposite sides to find compromise in
Others would argue and say no that it is unreasonable and that we need to keep our nose out of other people 's business. Then what if there wrong and we get attacked unexpected and thrusted into war just because we wouldn 't prevent any further conflict.
For this new form of government to stay in power it had to go to extreme measures to get rid of enemies and potential threats. With the reign of terror the new non-monarchy government would have not been able to form and the country’s economy would have continued to struggle. With the events that did occur it ultimately allowed the citizens and much larger say. The new government instituted great new laws like a maximum price for goods. This help everyone get at minimum a decent amount of food so they could survive.
The final idea is that correcting the wrongdoings will be done in a speedy manner. People put off doing what they do not want to do as long as possible. If the document did not mandate that the process be done quickly, the people would have put off correcting the wrongdoings as long as they could. 4. The document portrays the persecution of Christians in the Roman Empire.
The use of proxy wars were to ensure that a third world countries government would be a government approved by a major superpower such as the U.S or U.S.S.R.. In the secret war in laos the U.S supported the royal lao government against the Pathet Hao (doc 1b). This is significant because the people of laos did not have a say in what they wanted to do. This affected Laos because they should be able to choose what they want to believe and they should not have ideas crammed down their throats. On december 27th, 1979 afghan leader Amin was shot and killed by the soviet union, he was replaced by a soviet accepted leader Babrak kamal (doc. 9).
War in Syria DBQ Essay Many things cause war, stuff like Revenge, beliefs, Arguments, racism. There has be more than five five wars in Syria. Things that causes violence are are the people, the government, Islamic groups, and terrorist. The people that start wars are the pro-government,while the Islamic groups have constantly in war with the anti government terrorists have been attacking everyone.