The thinking processes and opinions of every human differ at one point or another and are influenced by many variables around us. People will argue their differences in order to persuade others to agree with their perspective. We see these arguments in our daily lives around our workplace with our peers and bosses, at home with our family, and within our society with politics and social movements. Arguments attempt to use reason to allow people to establish conclusions, but how do you know if you are giving or hearing a good argument? This discussion will analyze two arguments about the War in Iraq and determine if they are good arguments.
Arguments are common in everyone’s lives, but what actually constitutes a good argument? Obviously, a
…show more content…
It was thought that a terrorist group call al-Qaeda was responsible for carrying out these attacks. Later it was brought up that Saddam Hussein was cooperating with al-Qaeda and had weapons of mass destruction within his possession. Looking at the perspective of President George W. Bush we can see his attempt to persuade the American people to take action by manipulating their emotions by speculating that Saddam Hussein’s regime is a threat to peace by being affiliated to al-Qaeda and has weapons that could be detrimental in that hands of the wrong people. He stated that after the Persian Gulf War he was required to “destroy its weapons of mass destruction, cease development of those weapons, and stop all affiliations with terrorist groups” (Boss, 2012). He claims that the regime has violated all of those conditions, but offers no evidence to support that it is a true premise. It is further escalated when he states that “IF we KNOW Saddam Hussein has dangerous weapons -AND WE DO-…” (Boss, 2012). I form a conclusion that his choice of words may indicate there is unsureness about the matter and he was trying to reassure by stating “and we do.” It is then brought up that Iraq is training al-Qaeda terrorist to make bombs and chemical weapons, but then contradicts the statement by stating that our enemies would be “eager” to use …show more content…
It shows that arguments can even sound logical even with false premise and that conclusions can be formed with minimal relevance to the premise provided. It also shows that there is a clear difference between an effective argument and a “good” argument. The logic has to make enough sense for you audience to be persuaded not to make complete sense. Knowing this and what strategies to utilize when formulating an argument is the true key to being successful. While using a “good” argument that uses true premise to develop a conclusion is ideal it may not be as effective if the right strategies are not implemented with
1776 marked a significant year in American history. That was the year in which the U.S. declared its independence from its fathering nation, Britain. Britain did not just give America the freedom, America fought for their freedom. American broke away for numerous reasons. This paper will explain why the colonists broke away and whether or not their reasons for waging war and breaking justified.
War in Syria DBQ Essay Syria’s war has caused a lot of conflicts, fights, and separation. During Syria’s war a lot of people fled and left. They also started making accusations.
that’s all I’ve got to say” (Wiley, 133). This shows that he is both surprised and rattled because he believes that attacking, and killing people who are of no immediate threat to the security of the nation is wrong. Another
It is additionally tough to construction this as a fight of freedom. The Iraqi people have been held under the rule for decades. Has this merely nowadays come to the Administration 's
A Debating Democracy America has been built on the principle that everyone has a voice and that everyone should use it, this leads to an innumerable amount of arguments, some that still persist. In The Thirteen American Arguments by award-winning writer, NBC Analyst, and American journalist, Howard Fineman, the author outlines what he believes are the thirteen most fundamentals arguments in U.S history. These thirteen arguments as well the numerous others are the building blocks of democracy and debate in our country. One of the ideals that makes this country unique, is the value of free speech. Everyone has the freedom to make their voice heard to the rest of the country.
War is a state of armed conflict between different nations or states or different ups within a nation or state. Like several wars the United States has fought, this war had its strong supporters and its critics. Three reasons why the United States was NOT justified in going to war with Mexico are: President Polk believed in Manifest Destiny while others didn’t believe in him or God. U.S. should have never crossed when Mexico didn’t give permission. Slave owners brought slaves even though it was Slave-free land.
This figure of speech involves that the United States will stand strong after 9/11, nonetheless it will in like manner rebuke anyone that harms it. Also, declaration has made general society acknowledge there is a relationship amidst Hussein and the strikes of 9/11. A survey led in late 2003 uncovers that 70 percent of individuals met trust Hussein was specifically included with 9/11 (CBS September). This organization together is impossible in light of the fact that Osama container Laden 's has a solid contempt for the "unbeliever" administration of common Hussein. Shrubbery attempted to separate these affirmations: " 'There 's no doubt that Saddam Hussein had al Qaeda ties, ' the president said.
The applicant requests an upgrade of his general, under honorable conditions discharge to honorable. The applicant states, in effect, he accepted his punishment and feel he deserve more the time his in service. The applicant contends he joined the military at the age of 18, straight out of high school in order to attend college and obtain a degree. The applicant contends he served in the Army for ten years, deployed to Iraq on three occasions, and received the Army Commendation Medal for his performance of duty.
As the war progressed, the American public came to view the the war—and by default, the soldiers themselves—in a negative light. An article by Pew Research Center presents the differing attitudes during the Iraq War in its first five years. Initially, the war is viewed in a positive way, with 72% of those polled in favor of using military force and 88% describing the war as “going well” (Pew). However, the subsequent years show a shift in popular opinion, with only 38% of those polled in 2007 in favor of the use of military force in Iraq (Pew). Whether this is due to the rapid increase in deaths, the lack of “Weapons of Mass Destruction”, or just a general hatred of the Bush Administration, the public grew to detest this war that cost so much.
He includes that this was something that America would have to get through as a united country. Lastly, Bush asked for prayers for the who were grieving the loss of friends and family. He said that the people who were responsible for the “cowardly” acts would be punished. To conclude, he quoted a
Focusing on the early discussions, to the point where the U.S. entered World War II and began their debate about how to fight the Germans. A coalition force, planning and fighting as a team led to many advantages and disadvantages that ended many times with compromise. The sometimes heated planning conferences and meetings that led to debate and arguments about how to successfully fight and defeat the Germans was tenuous at best. The road was filled with obstacles, but the Allies navigated their way to a victory over the German led Axis Powers.
All of these events demonstrated that al-Qaeda could carry out terrifying attacks thousands of miles away from its base in Afghanistan. Al- qaeda’s leaders did not care about their gruesome actions. In their minds, God was on their side so they could do no wrong. Many people to this day still question our government about the 9/11 attacks and why someone did not take action before it got to this point.
President Bush used logical appeal in the opening sentence of his speech. He opened by saying, “Just 2 hours ago, allied air forces began an attack on military targets in Iraq and Kuwait.” This is key evidence that a war has been started. President Bush makes it clear that the reasoning of this war started on August 2nd. He continued to say that the dictator of Iraq, Saddam Hussein, invaded a “small and helpless neighbor,” Kuwait.
The despot Saddam Hussein started the Iraq war, a warmonger who overthrew the government in Iraq. The Iraqi high tribunal, in coordination with the United States assassinated President Saddam Hussein on December 30, 2006 (Britannica, 1). The United States captured Hussein and he went on trial in front of the Iraqi High Tribunal for crimes, including the murdering of 148 Shi’iahs in the village of Dujail in 1982 (PBS, 23). The assassination of Saddam Hussein was just because he rose to political power and maintained it through violent means and was a war-hungry despot, looking to conquer the Middle East; however others believe that the United States viewed him as such and that he had good intentions in mind.
“Terrorist attacks can shake the foundations of our biggest buildings, but they cannot touch the foundation of America. These acts shatter steel, but they cannot dent the steel of American resolve.” George W. Bush delivered this speech on the night of the September 11 attacks. The shattered steel of the Twin Towers, once towering the New York City skyline, forever changed America and its response to terrorism. The largest foreign attack on U.S. soil appropriately gave reason to Americans to recoil in fear and lose trust in the future, but in reality, the country displayed the opposite reaction.