ipl-logo

War Measures Act 1970

154 Words1 Page

There have been some reports that there were two people who are working in the government is kidnaped in January 1970. That were James Cross and Pierre Laborite. it is regarded as a subject of intense debate in the media and politics. Therefore, the powers of the War Measures Act have been used that mean allowed the suspension of traditional Canadian civil liberties. However, from this idea, I am not agreeing with Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau. They cannot have any right to detain anyone without reason even though they can innocent. At this time, there was a heightened fear that government confirm that anyone anywhere could be a target. Between 1970 and 1976, there were so many terrorist and violent of international and domestic terrorism.

Show More
Related

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Oka Affair In Canada

    581 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Oka affair turned many heads in Canada, and the world. There were two sides, the Oka, and the Canadian government. Both sides thought they were in the right, but who was. This essay will talk about the rights and wrongs of each side. I have researched this topic from many point’s of view.

    Read More

  • How Did Robert Borden Change Canada

    730 Words  | 3 Pages

    This act established by Borden’s government was vastly beneficial for Canada due to it being used then, and later (The Canadian Encyclopedia). The War Measures Act was a federal law embraced by the Parliament that gave powers to Canada’s government to keep security, defense, and order during the First World War. The War Measures Act was necessary and important as it did a great job by keeping Canada safe during the hard times and made it stronger as a nation. (The Canadian Encyclopedia) Therefore, it increased Canada’s independence and managed to remove it from being under Britain's control overtime as they were able to make their own decisions within their own grounds.

    Read More

  • War Measure Act Case Study

    1202 Words  | 5 Pages

    In support of the notion that the Supreme Court of Canada erred in upholding the Order-in-Council which permitted the forcible removal of “Japanese Canadian” from Canada, according to the Order in Council the word “deportation” means the “removal, pursuant to the authority of this Order (7355), of any person from any place in Canada”. This is a process of being sent away from a particular country based on legal reasons. But in this case, the Japanese were not foreigners in Canada but rather they were citizens before Canada invoked the War Measure Act. The deportation of the Japanese Canadians in 1945 was as a result of the World War II, which led to the suspicion by the Canadian government that the Japanese race was an ally with the German government. On the 15th of December 1945, Orders were made based on the War Measures act to remove all native Japanese and any other persons that is related to the Japanese race from Canada.

    Read More

  • Fair Trial Of Amr Khadr

    565 Words  | 3 Pages

    In addition, Omar Khadr was considered a terrorist and also had terrorism charges against him. Furthermore, Omar Khadr’s rights were violated during his detention. Firstly, Omar was not treated as a minor. For example, the minors in Guantanamo Bay were separated from the adults, but Omar Khadr was mixed with the rest of the detainees.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Elizabeth Loftus Memory In Canadian Courts Of Law

    983 Words  | 4 Pages

    In “Memory in Canadian Courts of Law”, Elizabeth Loftus introduces the readers to incidents in Canadian courts where “faulty memory of eyewitnesses” have unintentionally convicted innocent Canadians, causing them to carry a burden of being treated as a criminal even if they were later acquitted in order to use it as a tool to motivate those interested in the court system to display the horrendous flaw of eyewitnesses testifying in courts operating under the adversarial system such as in Canada. The flaw cannot be eliminated “unless or until better proof becomes available for these types of claims”. Ultimately, Loftus wants Canadians who cares about the legal system and the wellbeing of other Canadians who may be confronted with the possibility

    Read More

  • War Power Resolution 1973

    360 Words  | 2 Pages

    The president has many roles but, the most important one I think is being the Commander in Chief of are armed forces. As the Commander in Chief the president can mobilize military forces as see to protect critical choke points, interest, or allies to the United States. The War Power Resolution of 1973 helps give the president the authority to take action and mobilize the military. Now there are checks and balance to this act as there is in anything with are government. The first check and balance is having to notify congress within forty-eight hours of military mobilization.

    Read More

  • Why Is The War Measures Act Justified

    1367 Words  | 6 Pages

    There were many severe terms of the War Measures Act, but Trudeau didn’t use any of the difficult ones and he handled the crisis very well which to he received many compliments for. He began to realize that his decision is appropriate because he knew that kidnappings were the start of a plan to overthrow the government (Cruxton, Wilson 369). When a reporter asked Trudeau “how far will the government go”, Trudeau replied by saying “just watch me”. Trudeau’s son Justin Trudeau also used this famous quote. The act gave a lot of power to the police and they arrested a total of four hundred and sixty-five people.

    Read More

  • A Savage Christmas Film Analysis

    785 Words  | 4 Pages

    The second point they make is the government has tried to cover up this part of Canadian military history. David J. Bercuson, a historian, has examined

    Read More

  • Events That Led To The October Crisis Of 1970 In Quebec

    976 Words  | 4 Pages

    There were many events that led to the October crisis of 1970 in Quebec. There are differing opinions about the actions of Front de Liberation du Quebec (FLQ) with some in favor and some against them, but in my opinion any step that may put lives of civilians in danger and lead to hostage situation and anarchy should be stopped to protect innocent citizens of the country. in light of this the war measure act requested by the them premier of Quebec and supported by the then prime minister Trudeau was a necessary step in curbing terrorism and threat to human lives. October crisis of 1970 were triggered by the kidnapping of British trade commissioner, James cross from outside his office and that of minister of labor Pierre Laporte while playing

    Read More

  • Pierre Trudeau's Influence On Canada

    334 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the sixteen years that Trudeau was in power, he created many acts that still hold their significance. Pierre Trudeau encouraged multiculturalism to contribute to Canada’s growth as a country. He claimed that there was “no official

    Read More

  • How Did Pierre Trudeau Changed Canada?

    1421 Words  | 6 Pages

    Canada is now known to be a diverse, multicultural, bilingual and inclusive nation largely as a result of his work. Pierre Elliott Trudeau also believed in an equal Canada for all, he is primarily the one to introduce rights and freedoms to the citizens of Canada. While some view Pierre Trudeau as impulsive, for enforcing the War Measures Act, Trudeau enacted this for the protection of Canadian citizens against radical extremist and his actions were more rational than impulsive for the situation that had suddenly occurred. Pierre Trudeau was one of Canada’s greatest Prime Minister’s, who’s impact fundamentally changed the course of the nation by introducing multiculturalism, for introducing the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and for paradoxically upholding democracy by strong action during the October Crisis.

    Read More

  • Torture And Ethics Essay

    1060 Words  | 5 Pages

    In reference to a bill introduced to Congress forbidding the use of tactics defined by torture; The United States government must consider all of the ethical options and possibilities they have. Torturing anyone is morally unethical but allowing terrorists to murder innocent civilians is against every moral we, as humans possess. As morally just people America needs to find the exceptions in which we are willing to use torture in countering terrorism. As leaders of the free world our government has the responsibility to do everything in their power to protect innocent people and gain the needed information to do so. In order to win the war on terror, officials will occasionally have no choice but to torture the terrorists withholding information to prevent these attacks on humanity.

    Read More

  • Lester B. Pearson's Impact On Canada

    1259 Words  | 6 Pages

    Today, Canada is seen as a multicultural and peaceful nation that has evolved over the course of history. This great nation would never have been possible without the impact that former Prime Minister, Lester B. Pearson left on this country. His achievements and insights profoundly affected and shaped Canada’s nation. First, peacekeeping is an important part of Canada’s heritage and a reflection of its fundamental beliefs that Pearson implemented after dealing with world changing situations and winning a Nobel Prize. Also, his contributions as a liberal leader as well as the flaws and controversy with Diefenbaker did in fact define this country.

    Read More

  • War Measures Act Essay

    1064 Words  | 5 Pages

    A drastic approach some Quebeckers took happened during the October Crisis. It began on October 5, 1970, with the kidnapping of James Cross, a British trade commissioner in the city of Montreal, Quebec. This was carried out by a radical separatist group, Front de Libération du Québec, often shortened to FLQ. Later Pierre Laporte, the Minister of Labour, was kidnapped also. With these acts of terrorism plaguing Quebec, Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau enacted the War Measures Act.

    Read More

  • Essay On War Powers Act

    479 Words  | 2 Pages

    The constitution attempts to evenly distribute powers between the executive and legislative branches of the federal government by providing the president or the commander-in-chief the power to control and supervise the military upon approval by congress, who have the power to declare war and to support the armed forces. The subject of debate regarding the act is whether the president has the authority to send military troops to war without congressional approval. The way the war powers act was written makes it difficult to decipher approximately how much power is the president privileged in the war-making process. According to the constitution congress have the powers to authorize war by formally granting letters that verify and confirm the

    Read More

More about War Measures Act 1970

Open Document