A textual analysis of “The Warren Harding Error: Why We Fall For Tall, Dark, Handsome Men” In “The Warren Harding Error: Why We Fall for Tall, Dark, Handsome Men” – the third chapter of the book Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking, Gladwell poses a problem that people may unconsciously make prejudgments when they thin-slice. Gladwell convinces the readers that although thin-slicing is a powerful tool for people to comprehend their surroundings, the judgments made on the spur of a moment without contemplation below the surface are sometimes proved to be incorrect, racist, or even harmful. Throughout his piece of writing, Gladwell appears fair-minded and knowledgeable, provides his readers with sufficient data and statistics, and successfully employs emotional appeals; which strengthens and add credibility to his argument. “The Warren Harding Error” is divided into five smaller sections, starting with an anecdote of how President Harding won his presidency only because of his appearance was “beyond the local world”. The incompetence of President Harding in terms of politics is a prime example of how …show more content…
He describes the Harding case from the early encounter with Harry Daugherty to when Harding died of a stroke and viewed as “one of the worst presidents in the American history”. The fact that Gladwell started his piece with a mistaken judgement made by the public of America rather than an insight of what he is going to talk about also set the tone for the rest of the writing. In addition to historical knowledge, Gladwell appears to possess understanding of the psychology principles behind people’s behavior. In the second section called “Blink in Black and White”, he introduces the readers to scientific terms like “implicit associations” or “Implicit Association Test”, and a group of researchers behind
Gladwell’s concern for the discrepancies being allowed in our society and highlighting specific cases to make the reader hold on to the information and displaying his use of common values to invoke the audience’s emotions of sadness, happiness, and fear. When the audience is so involved with the story and statistics about the topic, it can be hard to catch the emotional manipulation he utilizes, especially when Gladwell provides supporting evidence for the chapters because the reader is usually focusing on facts alone. Gladwell heavily uses emotion in his diction and examples because if the audience is moved by the story of Marita, a hard working middle-schooler in the KIPP program in New York, applying herself and making up for the “missing
This can be seen in experiences within the memoir where affluent whites use derogatory terms such as “white trash” to describe the impoverished whites in the community (Carter, 20). Carter’s accounts of discrimination, which were strengthened by the inclusion of colloquialism, towards whites and blacks in his town lead the audience to the thought that discrimination and racism are learned actions by individuals in a society in order to maintain class distinctions. All in all, Carter’s recollection of various discriminatory events is effective in creating a tone of disapproval, which he uses to show his scorn for racism. In the end, An Hour Before Daylight is an autobiography, but it also serves as a platform where former President Carter uses vast examples of colloquialism, realistic depictions, and eventful accounts to prove that racism and bigotry are not concepts that a human is born with, but instead,
The stock market skyrocketed because of the liberated capital. It generated an unsteady financial bubble that directly led to the 1929, Great Depression. Harding was contentious t federal Government regulations of business, put in place by Progressives, Teddy Roosevelt, Wilson and Taft. He vacated civil servants from companies who were meant to improve balance in the U.S. economy. Throughout the Harding presidency nepotism, scandals, and extortions corrupted governmental divisions.
Roosevelt 's failure to see the potential flaws in his
President Hoover underestimated the Great Depression and the Dust Bowl, and started out assuring the citizens that this would be over in 60 days. When the depression got worse, he started a government financed program called the Hoover Dam. The problem of that was Hoover didn’t have money to pay for the program. Eventually the “Bonus Army Fiasco” happened, removing Herbert Hoover from presidency. People elected Roosevelt as president of the United States.
An example is how George Bush had had eight years of dismal American govern. Better yet, our Founding Fathers who created a presidential office that is ill-considered. This is why it’s important to know what they did in the past. Some believe that it wasn’t that bad because
Rhetorical precis: The Great Gatsby Ch. 1 Scott F. Fitzgerald, an American author, in chapter one of his novel “The Great Gatsby” (published in 1925), claims that the rich Americans are using prestigiousness, wealth, and power to allude their unsightly truth. By using the Buchanans as an example, a wealthy, powerful, and socially solid old family, Fitzgerald reveals dishonesty of Daisy and Jordan, worst of all, a racist, dishonest, and adulterer Tom Buchanan. Fitzgerald's purpose is to discourage the practice of formulating a conclusion based on the superficial appearance in order to make his readers reconsider their views of America. He builds an intimate relationship with his audience of readers who are interested in his novels.
In the nonfiction novel, “Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil,” American author, John Berendt, gives his account of a 1981 murder case that took place in Savannah, Georgia. Even though during the 1980s, United States as a whole is heading towards prosperity as the Cold War ends in 1981, he repeatedly touches back on the undercurrent southern racism. Berendt draws a vivid picture of Southern Gothic weirdness to convey, using real life occurrences and characters, the idea of what kind of people exist in the community to readers of all places. The writer uses rhetorical devices such as description, foreshadowing, and dysphemism to successfully depict the occurrences in suspenseful yet humorous tone.
One of the most prominent social biases, both in the 1920’s specifically and throughout American history, is race. In the period after WWI, race tensions were heightening. Tom clearly does not approve of the idea that black people could rise socially and “infiltrate” his world. Even though Tom himself has a mistress, he says, “Nowadays people begin by sneering at family life and family institutions and next they'll throw everything overboard and have intermarriage between black and white. ”(Fitzgerald p130)
Claim: Because of Tom’s race, he was misjudged and looked at as a threat to society. 1. Primary Evidence: When Bob Ewell says, “I seen that black nigger younder ruttin’ on my Mayella,” it explains that people just saw someone’s skin color and assumed that the colored person was up to no good (Lee 173). 2. Interpretation: Tom was wrapped up in evil and was misjudged harshly by his skin color and was “shot down” like a mockingbird by racism.
In this paper, I will be critiquing these articles and films in order to evaluate the purpose of these readings and how they have helped further develop race in America. But most importantly, whether the author has achieved its purpose to inform readers about CRT, whiteness, and racial inequality. First article, I will be analyzing is Critical Race Theory: An Introduction by Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic. Both authors explore Critical Race Theory in detail. As I previously mentioned, CRT is one of the most important developments mainly in the legal studies department.
Brent Staple created a powerful essay which appeared in Ms magazine in 1986 which pointed out that people are quick to assume another’s character based on race and appearance; furthermore, he was effectively able to get his point across through his style of writing which could throw the readers for a loop with his strong diction, the author’s ability to relate to most of his audience through personal experience, and by motivating the readers using outrage or appealing to their emotions. Staple’s style of writing, especially in the opening, can effectively draw and keep the audience hooked long enough for the readers to comprehend his message. His opening statement: “My first victim was a woman” uses strong diction to establish a dark serious
In which we had to think carefully and cohesively about the characters and their backgrounds. Although Harper Lee proves the point that social prejudice was a highly regarded prejudice. Harper Lees’ novel helps us to become more aware of prejudicial situations that occurred in the
In the novel, ‘To kill a mockingbird, Harper Lee demonstrates the small, imaginary town, the Maycomb County, as a place where racism and social inequality happens in the background of 1930s America. Not only the segregation between whites and blacks, but also the poor lived in a harsh state of living. As Scout, the young narrator, tells the story, Lee introduces and highlights the effects of racism and social inequality on the citizens of Maycomb County by using various characters such as Boo Radley, Tom Robinson, and Mayella Ewell. Firstly, Harper Lee portrays Boo Radley as a victim of social inequality through adjectives and metaphor in the phrase, “There was a long jagged scar that ran across his face; what teeth he had were yellow and rotten;” ‘Long jagged scar that ran across his face’ tells us that Boo Radley has stereotype about his appearance, which forces to imagine Boo as a scary and threatening person. The phrase, ‘yellow and rotten’ make the readers think as if Boo Radley is poor and low in a social hierarchy, as he cannot afford to brush his teeth.
The story represents the culmination of Wright’s passionate desire to observe and reflect upon the racist world around him. Racism is so insidious that it prevents Richard from interacting normally, even with the whites who do treat him with a semblance of respect or with fellow blacks. For Richard, the true problem of racism is not simply that it exists, but that its roots in American culture are so deep it is doubtful whether these roots can be destroyed without destroying the culture itself. “It might have been that my tardiness in learning to sense white people as "white" people came from the fact that many of my relatives were "white"-looking people. My grandmother, who was white as any "white" person, had never looked "white" to me” (Wright 23).