Was Alexander The Great Really A Tyrant?
Alexander has been named Alexander the Great, but was he really a great leader? Alexander did have some great accomplishments, but all of the many terrible things he did overpower the great things. The tactics he used in order to leave such great legacies were harsh and forceful. People only pay attention to the world-changing things he did when they should really focus on how he did them. Alexander was selfish, cruel and an overall power-hungry tyrant. Alexander is very well known for blending cultures, but what people don’t realize is that he used methodical, demanding ways to do so. If Alexander was a great leader he would have found a nicer way to do this, but Alexander wanted fast, easy power over large areas of land. For example, in 324 B.C.E., Alexander deduced that he must “...[force] his men to marry Persian women as a way of making sure there is a blending of cultures.” (World Generation: Timeline) This supports that Alexander was forceful because made his men marry and have children against their will. Alexander was a tyrant for many reasons including only caring about himself and his forceful and cruel tactics. Alexander is also famous for being the greatest military leader but he was a very bad person and he was cruel to people who hadn’t surrendered. He didn’t care about …show more content…
Alexander demanded that people blend cultures against their will, punished civilizations that refused to surrender and tricked people into thinking that he cared about his army. Some say he was involved in his own father’s death because Alexander wanted the crown. He did horrific things in order to succeed earning him the common title “Alexander the Great.” People would stop calling him by this false name if they knew the real roots of Alexander’s story. All in all, some people might think that Alexander was a great leader, but his greatness is actually a
To What Extent Was Alexander The Great Cruel
900 Words | 4 PagesIn addition, in the Legend of the Hat Band, he rewarded an innocent person who had done a service to him by killing him, showing that he relied so much on the legends that he was willing to kill a loyal soldier because it was thought that he might be a threat. He cared so much about legends that he was willing to sacrifice one of his own men. This does not seem like the act of someone ethical or wise as a great leader should be. A third reason that Alexander should not be considered great is that he used brutal methods to conquer land.
DBQ Essay: How Great Was Alexander The Great?
781 Words | 4 PagesAlexander killed an estimated of 100,000 enemy soldiers, and innocent civilians throughout his rein. (Doc. E). He killed all these people just because he wanted more land to gain more power. Most of these people did nothing to Alexander and had no affect on his life except they were an obstacle in the way of him gaining more power. Also Alexander killed a full army in East India because he saw a major opportunity to take control of land from one of the biggest empires.
Parallel Lives Plutarch Analysis
1783 Words | 8 PagesIn Parallel Lives by Plutarch, he portrays Alexander the Great as an outstanding moral individual and an excellent leader of his people. Although Plutarch illustrates Alexander as a wise, compassionate, and ambitious individual, his defense of Alexander against the people who think of Alexander as a bad leader is weak and inefficient. Plutarch’s defense of Alexander’s fallible qualities, such as his drinking problems and his apathy to his people at the later part of his life is questionable and easily disproved, weakening his argument that Alexander is a truly admirable person. The majority of the beginning of Alexander is dedicated to the description of Alexander’s background and his experiences as he grows up into a mature and ambitious
Alexander The Great Research Paper
445 Words | 2 PagesAlexander The Great’s title of “The Great” was not an exaggeration. To earn the title of “The Great”, you must've done some extremely good things as your reign as a king, queen, or emperor. Alexander The Great did many great and powerful things during his lifetime. He established an extremely powerful military, and he knew how to strategically conquer land, and he was interested in turning this conquered land into powerful areas.
Compare And Contrast Khan And Alexander The Great
493 Words | 2 PagesI focus on the challenge that his father Phillip left him. "Philip and his friends looked on at first in silence and anxiety for the result, till seeing him turn at the end of his career, and come back rejoicing and triumphing for what he had performed, they all burst out into acclamations of applause; and his father shedding tears, it is said, for joy, kissed him as he came down from his horse, and in his transport said, 'O my son, look thee out a kingdom equal to and worthy of thyself, for Macedonia is too little for thee' " (Alex. 6.8.). He was lead to believe that the cause of His life was to be the greatest leader and conqueror of all time. Alexander the Great's legacy is both far reaching and profound.
Why Alexander The Great Wasn T So Great After All
719 Words | 3 PagesThe first reason Alexander the great wasn't so great after all, is because he was arrogant. Arrogance comes when one has too much pride, and behaves in a unkind way, for example Alexander. To begin with, in Document A there are as many as 10 cities named after himself. Firstly, this shows arrogance because he did not conquer the cities alone, his soldiers were very handy but he didn't share his victory with them. What also makes Alexander arrogant is when in Document D he cared too much about the prophecy that he painfully had the solider killed, when the soldiers only intention was to get Alexander his hat back safely.
Essay On Alexander The Great's Military Organization
758 Words | 4 PagesWhat can we learn about Alexander the Great’s military organization? How does Alexander use the military structure to provide unity for his empire? How is he trying to change the relationship between Greeks and Persians in his army? Is he successful in forging unity? Why or why not?
Why Alexander Was Great Dbq
881 Words | 4 PagesHe was determined to uphold his fathers dream and take control of Persia. Alexander was considered strategic in his battles and wasn’t scared to go first before his army into war. His appreciation and sympathy for religion and his troops is what makes him such a heroic leader. By these
Alexander The Great Dbq Analysis
677 Words | 3 PagesHe was not great because he didn’t show concern for others, leadership, or intelligence. Alexander the Great was not the best because of his mass amounts of murder, not much care for his soldiers, and his poor ability to lead. The first reason Alexander the Great is not amazing because of the mass amount of murder he committed. One example is during the battle at Tyre, once Alexander’s army broke into the city they went on a ferocious killing spree (Doc C). Alexander had ordered anyone that was not inside the temple to be slain and he killed seven thousand Tyrians.
Alexander The Great Dbq
381 Words | 2 PagesDid you know that Alexander the Great was one of the greatest conquers? Alexander was born in 358 B.C. and he lived in a kingdom in Greece called Macedonia. Alexander was the son of the King Phillip II, and Alexander became king. During his life, did Alexander show enough leadership, courage, and concern for others to be considered great? By these measures, Alexander was great for at least three reasons: military genius, inspiring leader, and spread of Greek cultures.
Compare And Contrast Napoleon And Alexander The Great
760 Words | 4 PagesSECTION I: Alexander III of Macedon who is also known as Alexander the Great. He was born in July of 356 BC to Queen Olympias and King Phillip II of Macedon. As a young child Alexander the Great was tutored by the famous Greek philosopher, Aristotle. At a very young age he aided in the Battle of Chaeronea alongside his father. Also, at a young age his father King Phillip II of Macedon, Alexander’s father, was assassinated and subsequently died.
Alexander The Great's Influence On Western Civilization
1171 Words | 5 PagesAlexander the Great and the Macedonian Empire dominated the ancient world from 336 to 323 B.C. through military force and cultural exchange. The army of Macedonia had achieved an abundance of success due to Alexander's ability to provide his militaries with the best weapons, instill the training needed to perform battle formations and endure battle as well as the attitude needed to overcome adversity such as being outnumbered by the Persians. Despite conquering various lands, Alexander the Great chose not to impose his rule, but rather embrace certain customs, in order to spread Hellenism and eliminate the perception of being foreign; the process of unification impacted western civilization by mixing the people of Macedonia with other conquered
How Did Alexander The Great A Hero Or A Villain
746 Words | 3 PagesAnother reason why he was a villain because he killed members of his family so that he would become the ultimate successor to the throne. This should never be how a king becomes the ruler of his kingdom, ever. Even though I believe that Alexander the Great is a villain, others may think he was a hero. They may think that because he had conquered so many other nations.
Alexander The Great's Impact On Future Generations
1530 Words | 7 PagesGlorious men have graced the earth and have left significant impressions on the following generations. Alexander the Great suits that profile like none other. As arguably one of the most influential military leaders in history, Alexander conquered the majority of the known world, including large-scale empires such as the Persian. Succeeding his father, Philip II, to the throne at the age of 20, Alexander commanded an already skilled military, which he schooled further in the beginning of his reign. Even militarily significant empires had no chance against Alexander 's military brilliance and so he constructed one of the largest empires in history.
How Did Ancient Greece Influence Ancient Rome
1428 Words | 6 PagesAlexander the Great was the king and renown general of Macedonia. He led the Greek army against Persia and used many bold tactics in battle. Alexander the Great significantly expanded the Greek legacy by conquering territories. When he conquered a territory, he would not force the locals to assimilate into the Greek culture. This is to ensure they would not rebel against his leadership.
More about Was Alexander The Great Really A Tyrant?
To What Extent Was Alexander The Great Cruel
900 Words | 4 PagesDBQ Essay: How Great Was Alexander The Great?
781 Words | 4 PagesParallel Lives Plutarch Analysis
1783 Words | 8 PagesAlexander The Great Research Paper
445 Words | 2 PagesCompare And Contrast Khan And Alexander The Great
493 Words | 2 PagesWhy Alexander The Great Wasn T So Great After All
719 Words | 3 PagesEssay On Alexander The Great's Military Organization
758 Words | 4 PagesWhy Alexander Was Great Dbq
881 Words | 4 PagesAlexander The Great Dbq Analysis
677 Words | 3 PagesAlexander The Great Dbq
381 Words | 2 PagesCompare And Contrast Napoleon And Alexander The Great
760 Words | 4 PagesAlexander The Great's Influence On Western Civilization
1171 Words | 5 PagesHow Did Alexander The Great A Hero Or A Villain
746 Words | 3 PagesAlexander The Great's Impact On Future Generations
1530 Words | 7 PagesHow Did Ancient Greece Influence Ancient Rome
1428 Words | 6 Pages