Clink, Clink, Clink! That is the sound of the money going into Andrew Carnegie's pocket. Who was Andrew Carnegie? Well Andrew was a wealthy business executive. He ran the biggest steel business in the 19s. That made him one of the richest men. But what did he do with all the money he was making? The real question is, was Carnegie a hero? A hero is someone who does outstanding achievements. There were three reasons Andrew Carnegie was a hero he always gave back, he didn't just leave his money with his family, and brought beauty to a castle in Scotland. My first argument was that Carnegie was a hero because he donated a lot of money to charities. This does not always make you a hero though. However one piece of evidence that supports this reason is in document B. As in document B, Carnegie wants to spend his surplus on a good clause. A surplus is left over money after something like a job has been done. In document B we also see he said that the richest don't spend their money on a good clause. This is him saying that the richest have the most money but never use it for the good. A second piece of supporting evidence is in document C. In document C, we see a chart showing all the money …show more content…
One piece of evidence that supports this reason is in document B. We can see that Carnegie said that he didn't want to leave his money with his family. But inside of leaving his money with his family, He would leave it to better uses. I believe in not leaving all of his money with his family because they didn't work for it and other people need it. A second piece of supporting evidence is in document B as well. He didn't leave his money with his family. He inside gave it to better use. He also did this because he said that rich people don't do that good in this world. This evidence helps explain why Carnegie was a hero because he didn't leave his money with his family, but inside for better
He was also one the wealthiest men of his time and helped transform the steel industry. Andrew Carnegie could be considered to be a hero in many ways. He helped create jobs, transformed the steel industry and also helped other industries, and was an influential philanthropist. Many of the people at the time were poor and living in poverty. There weren't many jobs; and the one that they did have didn't pay enough to sustain a family.
In document B, we can see an article that Carnegie himself wrote, in June of 1889, where he states “(why should a man) wait until he is dead before he becomes of much good in the world?” He shows here not only his desire to help the world before he dies, but his aspiration that others do the same. He also expresses in the same article “The man who dies rich dies disgraced.” He again here exemplifies his want for the wealthy to do good for communities with their finances. These pieces of evidence show Carnegie not only wanted to make sure he was giving back, but that other affluent people were
Andrew Carnegie was a hero in some people 's eyes , not so much in others . That’s why everyone has their own opinion. In this essay you will read one reason someone might think he’s a hero , and two reasons why he is not a hero for the rest of the people. What that means is that this paper mostly leans on that Andrew Carnegie is not a hero and you will read why . Andrew Carnegie was a very wealthy man.
In his view, hoarding wealth and failing to use it for the greater good was shameful. Carnegie, following his philosophy, donated millions of dollars to fund libraries, cultural institutions and education all around the world. By building and funding such institutions, Carnegie left behind a semblance of his positive contributions as a Captain of industry by setting an example for others in his position. Take detailed notes from the reading about why Carnegie was a Robber Baron (bullets are fine).
Andrew Carnegie's views on wealth is almost the same as how billionaires think and use their money today . Carnegie's thought that people with money they would be able to help the poor by building libraries and other type of building that would help the middle class to get an education. He taught by helping the middle class rise from poverty and give them an education they would be able to do great things in life. Based on what I have read in both article Andrew Carnegie's views were considered ethical because he wanted what was best for the poor and he wanted to help the coal miners and give everyone an education.
The three characteristics of a hero are courage, integrity, and concern for others. Andrew Carnegie was a hero in these three areas of his life: wealth, community, and his ambitious state of mind. The first area in which Andrew Carnegie was he started as a blue collar worker and worked his way up the ‘workforce ladder’. When Andrew was just twelve years old he started working at a textile mill 12 hours a day for only $1.20 a week just so his family could eat and have shelter.
’’(America’s Library). What this quotation manifests is that Andrew Carnegie made made charitable donations, even before he decided to retire. The second manifestation made in this quote is that Carnegie was dedicated to giving his money away to the people who actually needed the money. Not only did Carnegie give his money to those in need, but carnegie also contributed to fund organizations and to fund
In 1848 Carnegie left scotland for a new life in the United States.(background 2). What make Andrew Carnegie a hero?what made him a hero, was that he developed successful business practices, gave money to many organizations, and had good employee relations. Andrew Carnegie used his numerous good ideas and strategies to become a successful businessman and make the world a better place.. Andrew Carnegie has three modes on those three modes in which surplus wealth can be disposed of. One of the modes
To consider surplus as trust funds to produce the most beneficial results from the community. ’’ He wanted to donate all his money for the greater good of the community. Andrew Carnegie also opened many Carnegie libraries where people can use books without a fee because he believed that if a man wanted work and gained knowledge he should be able to. In (document 9) it shows how much he donated not in total but in that list alone he donated 271,013,000 dollars and in total he gave 350,695,653.
Although Carnegie had extraordinary sums of money, he still wrote notes to himself as to how he would donate his money to the poor and charity. So, the big question here is: Did the charity of Andrew Carnegie make him a legend or not? Well, to begin with, what does it mean to be a philanthropist or to be a hero? A philanthropist is an individual who looks to promote the welfare of others, particularly by the generous donation of money to good causes. To be a hero/legend is to be an individual who
Andrew Carnegie was a hero through his hard work, valued education, and showed concern for others. Andrew Carnegie was a wealthy man but he was also humble. Andrew Carnegie progressively became wealthy which is shown in document A of his two houses. The first house was the house that Carnegie grew up in while the second house is Carnegie’s castle that he purchased when he got older. Next to the house he grew up in, the caption states, “Carnegie and his family of four lived in an attic room above his father’s shop”(125).
His philanthropies went towards things like libraries and donating instruments to help with education for the public. Giving away his wealth to help others better themselves, was a high priority for him. He contributed to the development of churches, libraries, and universities to help those who were working towards something. This may have been a result of the difficult childhood he had and the struggle he faced when trying to improve his life. Both this and Social Darwinism had a part in changing Carnegie’s view of himself from the son in a poverty-stricken family, into someone who took advantage when opportunities were presented and created an exceptional life for himself.
Carnegie was not a hero, because a hero does a deed selflessly, but he thought a lot about himself. 184,400,000 dollars was spent on big-name corporations and associations that would honor him by naming a meaningful belonging after him (Doc C). Carnegie was a man who wanted to feed his ego but should have donated money to help the community, not make himself known. Andrew Carnegie was not a true hero. Many may say, going from rags to riches makes Carnegie a hero.
In this text, he makes a valid argument as to why the rich should administer their own wealth unto those with less fortune. He begins his argument by explaining how wealth has revolutionized the United States. Carnegie mentions how the Sioux chief's wigwam was similar in appearance when compared to the huts of those inferior to him, and then compares this to the differences in economic classes of the 1800s. Carnegie later states how the very definition of wealth has changed throughout the years, where the poorest farmer of the 1860s owns more luxuries than the landlord of just a few years prior. Carnegie includes these two facts because he wants to show how much society has progressed throughout the last few hundred years.
Andrew Carnegie, captain of industry or a robber baron? The answer is surprisingly basic. Carnegie was a captain of industry and this is obvious, between his come up to his passing it creates a clear picture of a man who wanted to advance society. Now I won't discredit the fact that some may see him as a robber baron due to his ruthlessness in the field of business or how he didn't give enough pay to his workers, but if you think about it just a little bit he was a businessman meaning he had to make decisions that at the end of the day benefitted him and his business. I have 3 main points as to why he was a captain of industry.