Imagine what it was like to be a female living under the laws of Hammurabi? Well, the rules regarding females were really unfair. Hammurabi was a king who ruled the kingdom of Babylonia. He ruled for about 42 years, and during the time period, he made the 282 laws for the citizens of his kingdom. So, the real question is, was Hammurabi's Code just to the accuser, the victim, and society? Some may think that these laws are fair but, the laws are totally unjust because they are not fair to all, the punishment was too harsh, and it's immoral to society as a whole.
To start off, Hammurabi's code was unjust because it wasn't fair to all. For example, if a woman was a victim of assault from another person, the punishment of the accuser
…show more content…
Like, for example, is Law 195. This law states, If a son has struck his father, his hands shall be cut off." This is totally unfair because just for hitting someone causing you to lose your hands. While a person can recover from getting hit, losing hands is something that is forever. HAnds are very useful for everyday things too. Also, how would they get a job to provide for their family without hands? Another example is paragraph 4 of document B. It states, “ … If the rulers do not esteem my words, … If he destroys the law then I have given you, … may the great gods of heaven and earth … inflict a curse … upon his family, his land, his warriors, and his troops.” This is basically saying that if the upcoming king does not agree with some of the laws, that he can’t change them, even if he thinks it’s unfair to his subjects. The next King should be able to tweak the laws a little if he disagrees. Some people may claim that that Kings’ can do whatever they want but, Kings’ should do what is best for the citizens, and punishing them harder than necessary is not going to benefit their kingdom. Just because somebody struck their father doesn’t mean they should get their hands cut off, here is a big difference between the two. Also, the next Kings’ should be able to change the laws a little bit if they think that these are unjust and not fair to his
Hammurabi’s Code DBQ King Hammurabi’s rule began in the city of Babylon. He later then extended his control by taking over Larsa and Mari a large part of Mesopotamia. After expanding his land, Shamash, the god of justice presented him with a code of 232 laws (Doc A). These laws were then influenced throughout the community and were considered a part of the communities culture. I disagree with Hammurabi’s code because most laws were to cruel and targeted certain people.
Hammurabi’s Code Was It Just? Hammurabi’s code was just because of his personal injury laws. My first piece of evidence that his personal injury laws were just is that he says in doc B that he will protect the weak. He says Hammurabi the protecting king am I.
According to Hammurabi's code document c law 129,”If a married lady is caught [in adultery] with another man they shall blind them and cast them into the water.” this proves This was unjust because what if the man didn't know she was married and still has to get drowned while being innocent. It's exaggerated to be punished by death for cheating because they shouldn't be punished for the way they are. Another one of hammurabi's rules was document D law 23, “who has been robbed shall formally declare whatever he has lost before the god, and the city or district the robbery has been committed shall replace for him whatever he has lost if the robber is not caught”.
Hammurabi’s code was erected onto several steles (large pillars of stone) for all his citizens to read and obey. Was Hammurabi’s code just? There are three areas of law where Hammurabi’s code can be shown to be unjust. These are family, property, and personal injury law. Examples of injustice can be found in the area of family law.
The Code of Hammurabi is a well preserved Babylonian law code of ancient Mesopotamia, during 1754 BC. It is one of the oldest writings of significant length in the world. The words are written in wedge-shaped cuneiform letters that are carved into the stone. Was Hammurabi code just? Was the laws he had made and instructed fair for the people?
Was Hammurabi’s Code Just? (By Sofia Bradburn) Illustrate in your mind living during the 1750’s B.C.E and living in Babylon. The king and ruler, Hammurabi had multiple laws to rule this society, to make sure the widows and orphans were safe and that the weak were protected from the strong. Hammurabi ruled Babylon for about 32 years.
Was Hammurabi’s code just? Nearly 4,000 years ago, a man named Hammurabi became king of a city state called babylon. Hammurabi made a very important code in 18th century B.C.E. Hammurabi made 282 laws and he made these codes to protect the weak and poor from the strong. There are areas of law where Hammurabi’s code can be shown to be both, just and unjust. These are Family Law, Property Law, and Personal Injury Law.
Both systems of laws cause the people to become afraid of committing a crime. If you commit a crime in Hammurabi’s code, you can get thrown into a river, get your fingers cut off, or killed to death. However, if you commit a crime in Modern Law, you can get sentenced to jail or get fined. Lastly, they are both similar because they both offer protection for your belongings and you. They both punish people who invade your property and your
Some things we know about Hammurabi is that he was a king for 42 years! In addition to that he was a king of a city state in Mesopotamia called, Babylon. Something else about Hammurabi is that he took power in 1792 BCE. Hammurabi also developed a code totaling an astonishing 282 laws. My question I need to answer is, Was Hammurabi’s Code Fair?
These laws should both have the same consequences because all women should be treated equal. These laws on injury show that Hammurabi's code is very unjust. Hammurabi’s code may have been written to protect everyone, but the laws ended up being excessive and harmful. The laws about family, property, and injury are cruelly excessive and are unequal towards different classes.
Bang!!!!!! Welcome to the best essay around. I will be talking about hammurabi and his code. There were lots of laws in his code that he put on a stele in the center of babylonia. He also was the first person to make the laws.
Funk and Wagnall New World Encyclopedia wrote, “The basis of criminal law is that of equal retaliation, comparable to the Semitic law of ‘an eye for an eye’”(“Hammurabi, Code of” 1). Hammurabi was the first to make the law code meaning he was the first to start the foundation for our law system today. He was the father of law and today his justice code is still apparent today. The code of Hammurabi was designed to protect the weak, which includes: women, children and slaves. Funk and Wagnall wrote, “It seeks to protect the weak and the poor, including women, children, and slaves, against injustice at the hands of the rich and powerful”(Hammurabi, Code of” 1).
King Hammurabi’s codes were unjust because of the evidence found in the 282 laws. The codes that King Hammurabi wrote about were personal injury law, property law and family law. First, there is evidence that the codes were unjust. The first, code was personal injury law.
Hammurabi’s code gives judgements and consequences for certain crimes. The punishment for a crime depended on one’s social rank. There were essentially three classes; the priests and noble landlords, the freemen, and slaves. Each law illustrated the division in the societies social status. As a particular law read; “If a man has destroyed the eye of another free man, his own eye shall be destroyed.
The Code of Hammurabi was written by King Hammurabi and were the first set of laws to ever be created. Hammurabi created 282 laws, that set standards in his empire and in ancient Mesopotamia. Hammurabi made it clear that the laws were not only to equalize society but also establish fairness and also protect the weak from the strong. However, according to the laws, the punishment for men, women, rich, and the poor, were all different; leading that he made the laws unfair. The women of Mesopotamia had a series of laws where it clearly shows they were classified as property.