Of Morals and Intentions The ending of Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck has debatably one of the greatest plot twists ever written, but it also poses a very controversial question; Was it morally correct for George to kill Lennie? George’s justification for killing Lennie was based upon Lennie’s previous actions, and the outcomes of future actions that could occur. It’s difficult for readers in this modern day and age to understand why George would’ve chosen to kill Lennie among other options, but after researching these options, they seem just as morbid as the latter. Lennie could be defined as mentally retarded, or even diagnosed with a mental illness today. Along with his psychological issues came making very bad choices, without truly …show more content…
George was a man of great morals and intentions, and his choice to kill Lennie was made to protect him from the harsh realities of his other options. Living in an age where mental illness is still widely treated with a stigma and new modern medical treatments exist, it’s hard to pull ourselves out of our own reality and walk in either of the main character’s shoes to try to make a conclusion upon if George made the best choice regarding Lennie’s death. Mental illness is defined today as “a mental or bodily condition marked primarily by sufficient disorganization of personality, mind, and emotions to seriously impair the normal psychological functioning of the individual” (“Mental Illness”) but also had a totally …show more content…
Many of the “patients” were sent to the institutions for varying reasons that did not require medical attention. This increased the patient to doctor ratio, and slowed other patient’s chances of getting the medical attention they needed, even if it was not truly helping their illness. The term mentally ill is defined as “continued display of unsound judgements and actions that do not fit into society’s values” (Swart) and “according the the Weschler Adult Scale III, mental retardation is at an IQ of 70” (“A Step”). “The Institutions were overcrowded with people who couldn’t really get better” (Payne). “Many of the patients got in because they weren’t wanted, they had phobias or panic attacks, or they were looking for a home” (Mental). “Being senile, elderly, deaf, blind, and depressed were all mental illnesses and reasons to be sent into the institutions” (Payne). If all these reasons were defined as mentally ill, then Lennie would have been sent into an institution, without a
The agreement is yes George should have killed Lennie in Of Mice and Men, the reasons are that Curley would have killed him anyway and that they didn’t have enough money for a trail. George should not have killed Lennie because Curley would have killed him anyway. You know this because of this quote “ I’m gonna get him. I’m going for my shotgun. I’ll kill that big son-of-a-bitch myself.
George is justified in euthanizing Lennie because he prevented suffering, he realized that Lennie would continue to harm others and himself, and he knew that Lennie was incapable of making a decision for himself. One reason George euthanized Lennie is when he realized that Lennie would continue to harm others and himself. Lennie is not even aware of how strong he is. Whenever he pets a mouse, he ends up crushing it not even realizing he killed it. Lennie doesn't understand the long term effects that come along with killing a living creature.
Some people believe that killing another human being for the sake of “putting them out of their misery” is the right thing to do. They are wrong. The act of committing homicide cannot be reversed. He is taking away an indefinite amount of time from a person’s life : time that an individual might become stronger or even fully recover. That is why George should not have taken Lennie’s life away for the intention of saving his life.
Was George justified in killing Lennie? George in Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck was more than justified to kill his best friend, Lennie. George was his best friend and even though it was probably tough he did it for the greater good. This is a novel that takes place during the Great Depression and it is about two men, George and Lennie, who are walking to a ranch.
Oh, for Mercy’s Sake! Taking someone’s life is nearly impossible to justify; circumstances have to be extreme, and conditions have to be awful. In John Steinbeck’s novella, Of Mice and Men, George had to make a tough decision when he killed his best friend, Lennie, to save him from a more painful death. The story takes place during the Great Depression in California, and follows two unlikely friends, Lennie, an extremely strong yet mentally disabled man, and George, who is much smarter and the leader of the two. George and Lennie are migrant workers, and after losing their previous job, have come a ranch to find work.
In chapter 6 of Of Mice and Men, by John Steinbeck, George is faced with the decision of killing Lennie. After Lennie killed Curley’s wife he runs away while Curley and everyone else chase after him. When Lennie is waiting at the river he sees Geroge and George talks about their future and that no one will bother him anymore and Geroge kills Lennie. George had to choose to let Curley kill Lennie or kill Lennie himself and he chose to kill Lennie himself. I agree with George’s decision to kill George himself because it would save Lennie from Curley and he could be with Lennie in his last moments.
Based on what Slim, a ranch worker, had told George after he had shot Lennie in an act of ‘mercy’, it shows that sometimes a person is going to have to do hard tasks that are wrong, but the effect of the outcome is right. Slim completely agreed with the action that George took on Lennie. George saw that Lennie was going to be living a horrid life behind bars or have the most painful death possible as soon as the other ranch workers had found him, so before they did, George ended Lennie’s life. Killing someone in the act of mercy and killing someone for an act of hate have two completely different meanings. Ending somebody’s life in an act of kindness, and love is not unacceptable in any way and should be valued more from this point
They will say that George is constantly annoyed with having to deal with Lennie and that he kills him to relieve himself of his presence. In reality, George is only temporarily frustrated with Lennie, finding him inconvenient at times, but he does not dislike Lennie. He only gets upset with him from time to time, just as anyone would. Another example people bring up for the case of George murdering Lennie, is that he was a burden, stopping him from finding work, keeping a job, and getting him into trouble. George does not actually see Lennie as a burden but is looking out for him after he promised Lennie’s Aunt Clara that he’d watch out for him.
In Mice of Men by John Steinbeck, George should have killed Lennie. Lennie should have been killed because he had broke Curley’s hand, killed a puppy, and killed a woman. Lennie was becoming a threat. "If I was alone I could live so easy." His voice was monotonous, had no emphasis.
In the book Mice and Men George was faced with a tough decision of killing his best friends or letting him suffer, he ended up killing him. I believe George's decision to kill Lennie himself was justified. It think it was justified because if George didn't kill Lennie himself then Lennie would have had to endure some form of torture. Candy was talked into having someone shoot his dog. Candy raised his dog up since he was a pup and they've been like best friends.
In what situation would it be okay to kill your best friend? Even if you were trying to help them would it still justify murder? Although it violates God's law and Man's law could it still be seen as a justifiable choice. A man named George was given this hard decision. George was a short man who traveled with an abnormally large man with the heart of a child who went by Lennie.
In this story Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck, I do believe that George was right to kill Lennie. Some people will say that it was wrong for George to kill Lennie But to be honest with you—there was no escape, and I say this because a little bit after George hears “a man’s voice call up from the river, and another man answer”(100). So knowing that George heard voices from up the river probably means that Curley and his men where near by. I also strongly believe that if George didn’t kill Lennie, the others would’ve done much worse things to him. I like to think of it as a question.
Some people might think in the opposite side that George should not killed Lennie because Lennie did not mean to anything. He has done it without knowing how strong of himself. Lennie made many troubles this might be because of his disability, but this is the reason that he deserves to live. He has done many thing that make George get into trouble and It is better if Lennie has to die because of George shoot him not the other. "All the time he coulda had such a good time if it was not for you” (Steinbeck).
In the novella, Of Mice and Men, by John Steinbeck, George’s decision to kill Lennie at the end of the novel was justified. George and Lennie were best friends, and have been since they were little. They got ran out of Weed(the old farm they used to work at) for harassing a girl and not letting her go. He was just scared from her screaming and kicking. He didn’t mean to harm, or scare her.
It is clear that George did not have the right to end Lennie 's life in such a selfish way. George always talks to Lennie about how fabulous they are when they are together at their own ranch and from day to day I end up with their life in a very cruel way. In conclusion, it can be said that George 's reasons for ending George 's life were enough to do so since Lennie was a very dependent person and could not stand alone. George tried to help him at all times as far as he could, but still Lennie was still in serious trouble, that 's precisely the reason why George wanted to prevent Lennie suffering in the future because he realized that he could not live alone.