A cherished leader? A wicked dictator? Depending on the person, Julius Caesar was either a hero or a villain. Caesar made many magnificent impacts that helped Rome and showed that he was a hero. I think Julius Caesar was a hero because he proved to be kind to his enemies, changed the local government, so that it ran better, and brought peace and order to Rome. Firstly, Caesar proved to be kind to his enemies. Just hearing that sentence must set off the thought, “Why would anyone be kind to his enemies? These are just lies!” Actually, Caesar offered them the choice of whether they wanted to join the government or die. He gave them mercy, even though they fought. The fact that he didn’t immediately torture or kill them says a lot, …show more content…
I completely disagree with that thought. In my perspective, he brought peace and order to Rome. “How did Caesar bring peace and order to all of Rome? That's impossible,” well when Caesar named himself dictator, his followers were overjoyed. Others thought that he was trying to become a king. During his time ruling, many Plebeians were poor and had no land. Caesar did not sit around and do nothing, no, he founded colonies in Spain, France, and Switzerland to provide them with a piece of land. There were also many citizens with no jobs, so Caesar set up job programs for them. He also reformed the calendar, as a result, citizens were able to understand the new way time was divided into.. Moreover, Caesar had a major impact on Rome’s peace and order. In the end, Julius Caesar is debated on whether he is a hero or a villain. I stand by the opinion that he was a hero. He proved to be kind to his enemies, changed the local governments, so they ran better, as well as brought peace and order to Rome, if accomplishing that doesn't make you a hero, I don't know what
Some believed Caesar was power hungry and that he will do anything to become more powerful. Also that Caesar will just go through a town and just kill everything he sees to conquer the most land. However, Caesar is not a power hungry animal that will kill anybody to get higher and more powerful. Caesar has conquered lots and lots of land but he is not an animal, he doesn’t go through and kill everything he sees. Caesar was a great man who died a hero.
Caesar himself documented a letter in 46 BC, stating his political aims to achieve ‘peace for the provinces, and security for the Empire’ (source 11). Although possibly serving as propaganda, Caesar essentially represents himself as champion of Rome. This did indeed occur, as Caesar established stability by establishing a uniform system of government among the provinces, and also reforming the tax system in order to reduce corruption (source 9). In addition, measures were passed in order to relieve debt and stabilise the economy, while the amount of senators was increased to 900, simultaneously increasing the number of praetors, questers and aediles (source 9). By increasing the number of senatorial positions, essentially, Caesar was transferring power to the plebeians, which is an obvious contradiction to claims Caesar was merely seeking personal glory, as his power was used to enhance
Caesar eventually defeated Pompey and was the sole rule of Rome, thus tried reforming every aspect of the people’s life. As a result, Caesar ruling as a dictator significantly contributed to the fall of the Roman republic as Rome was no longer a republic but a
Politically, he removed a corrupt tax system, removed a quarter of Rome’s debt, and allowed tenants to live free of rent for a year. This shows that Caesar did the best possible for Rome’s citizens. However, Brutus portrayed him as a bad man to his crowds during
He increased how many rights the common allied citizen had. He also granted full citizenship to all of the teachers and doctors in Rome that did not already have it. Although it can appear as if Caesar wanted to be King, this was not the case. The reason he passed these laws was to grow Rome. Growing Rome would not only grow the amount of people in the Roman army it would also help the Roman economy because when there are more people buying items, there are more people selling the items, thus adding jobs to Rome, thus lowering the unemployment rate.
Historians may argue that Julius Caesar helped rome to make it better and stronger for the people. While this might be true this is misleading because all of Julius Caesar's good actions like giving people more jobs,but it just covered up his worse actions that hurt rome. Also Julius Caesar was named a awful man throughout history from not persevering in hard situations, hurting not helping rome, and doing things for himself. To begin with Julius Caesar was named a awful man from how he didn’t persevere in hard situations. One way he didn't persevere was when Sulla (the emperor of the time) ordered Julius to divorce Cornelia (his first wife) because she was from the family of Sulla's enemies.
Julius Caesar was very popular with the plebeians and lower classes for supporting them. He did this in ways like creating jobs for them. He made many other reforms such as enforcing laws against crime, and including supporters from Italy and other regions in the senate (Cornine et al. 248-249). He made a new Roman calendar, which was helpful to everyday life.
For starters, he is the reason the Roman Republic fell and the Roman Empire rose. Despite the rise of the empire was a relatively good geographical outcome, the fact that it was governed by a dictatorship, created a few problems. One being that most Romans were not in favor of a monarchical life. But, when he came into power the first thing that he did was make extreme cutbacks on the Senate. This can also be a result of his power thirst.
Another accomplishment Julius did was he brought down Roman debt, and this satisfies many borrowers and lenders. Julius Caesar also improved the Roman calendar to the Julian calendar, and he granted citizenship to people living outside of Rome. Secondly, Julius Caesar helps the poor and middle class a lot, which these classes favor him. Julius
I think that Caesar did not deserve to be murdered for the fact that he had a different view than other people. In (act II,scene 1,line 32-34) the text says “And therefore think him as a serpent’s egg which,hatched,would as his kind grow mischievous and kill him in the shell.” This text is saying that he is evil and should be killed. Conspirators should not have killed Caesar. Just because someone has different views and opinions that you don't like you can't murder them for that.
Julius Caesar was the Dictator of Rome in 42 BC who accomplished many things. Many people believed that he was a hero, but Julius Caesar was a very ambitious dictator and was more of a villain than a hero. Julius Caesar was a villain because he didn’t think first before doing something, he forced the Senate to name him dictator for life and he also was a glory hound and put his needs before the republic. To begin with, Julius Caesar was a was a glory hound and put his needs before the republic. Caesar used his power as dictator more towards his advantage instead of helping the people in Rome.
He stabilized the empire, and thus destroyed the republic. His short reign ended what was left of the republic. People contemplate whether or not he was a good leader, and if he is the main reason for the fall. In reality, the fall of the republic was inevitable. Caesar just sped it up slightly.
He was always courageous and persistent in battle, which made many individuals admire him. Similarly, Julius Caesar was a leader of Ancient Rome. In the beginning of Caesar’s reign, he
This proved his worthiness to being ruler by justifying his abilities to provide for and protect his empire. Since the Romans did not like that title of king, “he received the title Augustus by decree of the senate.” During his reign, Caesar accomplish countless things, which is why he is still talked highly about to this day. He repaired the conduits of aqueducts, dozens of temples, and completed the Julian forum and the basilica. He did these things because, like Qin, he loved and truly cared about his empire and wanted to see it flourish and restored; not broken and destroyed.
Once again, Shakespeare was able to bring his characters to life. By blending love, emotion, tension and anticipation together, a masterpiece was created. Through his art work, a number of characters evolved. Julius Caesar was not only the main character, but he was a man made up of words, words of Shakespeare, that perfectly represented the three views that made him complete; the inner personality of Caesar, his physical traits and other characters' views of him. An important figure in Rome, a part of the ruling council and a great leader that was admired by all.