Lizzie Borden is Guilty Many cases were named “Trials of the 19th Century”. Lizzie Borden’s trial was one of them. Lizzie was put on trial for the murder of her father and step mother. She was acquitted however. This verdict still causes speculation, even over 100 years after the trial. Many found the verdict correct, she could not have killed her parents. Lizzie did not fit the cold-blooded type; she was a woman and a regular church goer. Her defendants claim the evidence against her was all circumstantial. However, there are those that believe she is the murderer. The evidence gathered all pointed only to her. She was found innocent because the police at the time mishandled the case, the evidence that was collected pointed to her, she was …show more content…
She attempted to buy poison the day before they died. She then constantly expressed concern for her father’s life. It sounds as if she was setting up to look like the concerned daughter for when she killed her parents. If it was not her, who could have murdered them? This person would have had to have easy access into the house, stayed inside for over an hour without being found, left without anyone noticing, and had a motive to violently murder an elderly couple. One of her most loyal defenders, Michael Martin, author of “Parallel Lives…”, when asked who could have killed them he replied with “No one knows” (Booth). This murderer would have to have left the house covered in blood with a bloody ax. The witnesses during the trial reported not having seen any suspicious characters on the street at 11:30 (Masterton). There is no one else that fits. Lizzie was in the house during both murders. Bridget was outside cleaning the windows when Abby was killed and napping when Andrew was killed. When Bridget testified in court she said she had not seen any other person around the house, except Lizzie. It is hard to believe that Lizzie did not hear the crime taking place. Abby fell to the floor hard, she was surprised, and was axed 19 times. It could not have been a silent act. When Bridget entered back into the house, after cleaning the windows, she reported to the police she heard Lizzie laughing upstairs. This was between the times Abby was killed. Lizzie was the last person to see her father alive when he entered the house (Masterton). Lizzie said she was in the barn when her father was being killed. She was in there for about 15 to 20 minutes she claimed. But when the police went in there to investigate it was hard to believe anyone could stay in there for so long. Even more importantly, they found no footprints (Linder). Bridget testified that the time period between Lizzie finding Andrew dead and when
“August 4, 1892, Andrew and Abby Borden are murdered in their home in Fall River, Massachusetts.” Chery Eddy Lizzie Borden is arrested for the murder of her father and stepmother. ... Lizzie Borden was found not guilty But I think that she was. The first reason, I think lizzie borden was the murderer because of the suspicious behavior before and after the murder. A clean, handle-free hatchet blade was found in the basement, which was the only reason it was suggested murder weapon.
For 4 hours, Lizzie gave very confused and contradictory answers to the questions that she answer. After 2 days later, Police Chief Hilliard arrested Lizzie Borden. The next day, Lizzie entered a plea of "Not Guilty" to the charges of murder and was transported by railcar to the jail in Taunton. In August 22, Lizzie returned to a Fall River courtroom for her preliminary hearing, at the end of which Judge Josiah Blaisdell pronounced her "probably guilty" and ordered her to face a grand jury and possible charges for the murder of her parents. The trial of Lizzie Borden opened in June 5, 1893 in the New Bedford Courthouse before a panel of three judges.
Evidence points to the fact that Lizzie Borden, a normal woman who people thought was not capable of such a crime, is guilty. Lizzie Borden was guilty because, besides the maid, she was the only person in the house. She also had a motive, a motive to get her wealthy father’s money. It could only be her. She was the only one who would have the motive and would have done the crime.
The following evidence is what proves Lizzie is not guilty. First, all cases like this must include evidence to find the killer, but none was found against LIzzie to make her guilty. According to Source #1 , “There was no physical evidence linking her to the murders. A hatchet had been discovered in
The murder of Lizzie Borden’s father, Andrew borden, and her stepmother Abby Borden has been an ongoing mystery over 100 years now. No one has seemed to figure out the real murderer. A main suspect that the police had interviewed was Lizzie borden, the daughter to Andrew Borden and step daughter to Abby Borden. Yet no one has seemed to figure out the real murderer. I believe Lizzie borden murdered her parents with having satisfaction that she covered it up so well.
Nobody believe her that she was the killer. Most of the court room judge was all male. So, they didn’t believe that a woman could be able to kill her own family. She was guilty and wasn’t put in jail without any prove that she killed them.
Even though the wounds were most likely from an ax, any other person could own an ax like used for the injuries. No weapon was found with any blood or evidence to make Lizzie guilty. Lizzie’s personality and emotions play a big part in the case. Lizzie was always a kind-hearted person. She taught Sunday school to little children.
In August 1892, one of the most disastrous murderers occurred that is still yet to be solved. Andrew Jackson Borden and Abby Durfee Borden were a married couple in the 19th century. They were suddenly murdered with an ax and were given multiple whacks to the head. Lizzie Borden, daughter of the two victims, still remains as the only suspect that committed the murderers. For this reason, Lizzie Borden is guilty.
This could also explain the bloody towels, as she would not have had time to clean up all of the evidence before someone discovered her. Another theory places Bridget Sullivan, the family’s maid, as Lizzie’s lesbian lover who wanted to kill the Bordens because she was “enraged by Lizzie’s suffering at the hands of her cruel stepmother” (Newton 51). However, there is not much evidence to support this portion of the theory. Lizzie and Bridget have also been theorized to have worked together for the murders, as they were the only ones near or inside the house at the times of both killings (McBone). John Morse, a maternal uncle of Lizzie and Bridget, is another suspect.
Other family members could be guilty of the crime, not just Lizzie. The first possible suspect that comes to mind is John Morse, Lizzie’s uncle who, after supposedly being made aware of the horrible murders, is said to have “ambled” into the back yard and proceeded to “eat pears in the shade” (King 27). The next possible suspect would have to be Emma, who, being out of town that day was sent a telegram telling her about the murders, but she “did not catch the next train,” or the next, in fact she did not “return” home “until after seven that night” (King 27). Doesn't that seem a little odd, seeing as her father was just killed; unless she had something to do with it and couldn’t get home until then, but we will never know. Another possible suspect is Bridget Sullivan, the maid who happened to be in and around the house at the time of the murders (“The Lizzie Borden Story”).
An Account “ The most important of these witnesses, twenty-six-year-old Bridget Sullivan, testified that Lizzie was the only person she saw in the home at the time her parents were murdered…” “3”. Now you can be innocent and have a murder happen in your house while you’re inside the exact same house, but what is wrong with this incident is that there was no forced entry on any of the windows or doors really doesn’t help your case that you’re
Why She Is Guilty “My door was open part of the time, and part of the time I tried to get a nap and their voices annoyed me, and I closed it. I kept it open in summer more or less, and closed in winter.” Lizzie Borden stated after the murder.(BrainyQuotes.com) The people who seem innocent are the real guilty ones. Some of them try to hide behind their shyness or the motive.
Before Abby’s death, a dressmaker mistakenly referred to Abby as Lizzie’s mother. To the dressmaker’s surprise, Lizzie roared, “don’t call her that to me. She is a mean thing and we hate her.” Lizzie claimed that her older sister, Emma, was the only maternal figure in her life. Furthermore, Lizzie’s relationship with her father was strained.
Furthermore, Lizzie’s emotional reactions during the trial, compared to the maid’s, provided another reason for suspicion. Prior to the trial, Lizzie Borden appeared emotionally unharmed by the recent murders of her family members, while Bridget Sullivan seemed distressed and tense (Berni 40). The community widely accepted Ms. Sullivan’s reaction as an accurate and understandable response; however, the public second-guessed Lizzie Borden’s reactions. Almost as a response to public opinion, the behaviors of both women switched as the trial began. Lizzie Borden began showing remorse and many uncontrollable outbursts.
There were lots of loose ends and unsolved questions. I am here to convince you that Lizzie did not do it and, that she is innocent. Firstly, imagine being accused of killing your parents. How would that make you feel?