It’s crazy to think a Sunday School teacher in her mid - 30’s murder her parents. Many pieces of evidence support my theory that Lizzie Borden is guilty of her parent’s murder. Some points that I will discuss later on involve how she got away with it, evidence that goes against her, and her behavior before and after the murder. As stated before, Lizzie Borden was a Sunday School teacher in her mid – 30’s, unmarried with no kids. So who would expect a sweet, innocent woman like that to commit such a harsh crime? Even though it is unexpected, there is a ton of evidence that goes against Lizzie Borden. First of all, when the incident happened, Lizzie provided an alibi that was unreliable and inconsistent. However, everyone else in her family was …show more content…
In addition to a shaky alibi, Lizzie had strange behavior and said strange things before and after the murder took place. An example of that is before the murder happened, she had been seen trying to buy poisonous prussic acid. She claimed it was only for cleaning, but it’s very possible that murder was on her mind. Another thing that happened a day before the murders occurred is that one of Lizzie’s friends, Alice Russell, reported something strange that Lizzie said. According to Alice, Lizzie said, “I feel as if something were hanging over me and I cannot throw it off”. Lizzie also added something about how she was concerned for her father and her family that one of her dad’s enemies were going to do something bad to them. Given all of this evidence, it may seem shocking that she got away with it. However, back in that time it was highly believed a woman was simply not capable of murder. Lizzie also helped out supporting that thought by stating that she does not have the strength to kill someone. Also, there were no fingerprints found on the axe or anything, it was freshly cleaned. Another thing that happened was when they showed the chopped up skulls of Abby and Andrew for evidence, Lizzie fainted gaining sympathy from people. All this evidence makes it clear that Lizzie Borden is guilty for the murder of Andrew and Abby Borden. But sadly, she got
“August 4, 1892, Andrew and Abby Borden are murdered in their home in Fall River, Massachusetts.” Chery Eddy Lizzie Borden is arrested for the murder of her father and stepmother. ... Lizzie Borden was found not guilty But I think that she was. The first reason, I think lizzie borden was the murderer because of the suspicious behavior before and after the murder. A clean, handle-free hatchet blade was found in the basement, which was the only reason it was suggested murder weapon.
The following evidence is what proves Lizzie is not guilty. First, all cases like this must include evidence to find the killer, but none was found against LIzzie to make her guilty. According to Source #1 , “There was no physical evidence linking her to the murders. A hatchet had been discovered in
In Source # 1, it claims, “There was no physical evidence linking her to the murders.” Physical evidence is a significant key during any murder case. When there is a lack of evidence, there is a tough time finding a murder. If there is no evidence on their main suspect, Lizzie Borden, then she shouldn’t be the main suspect. How can you suspect someone with murder without any physical evidence against her?
“Lizzie Borden took an ax, and gave her mother forty whacks when she saw what she had done, She gave her father forty-one” the infamous song of Lizzie Borden allegedly accused of both the murders of her father and stepmother. But now come to think could she really have been innocent? There are many suspicious details leading to her being guilty but Lizzie was declared innocent. So now the suspicion begins. Despite the many information on the Lizzie Borden case, I believe Lizzie Borden should have been proven guilty.
It is clear that Lizzie Borden committed this crime because of the evidence against her, the rage in the murders, and
This may well prove her guilt in that she tried to find the least suspicious place to be during the murders. The police found a bucket of bloody towels in the basement of the Borden home, and they were told that Lizzie had been menstruating. The head of an axe was also found (“Vengeful Daughter”). While Lizzie could have been on her period, it is a shocking coincidence that the two events coincided. Perhaps the most suspicious evidence would be the fact that Lizzie burned a dress the day after her parents funeral.
At the time of the trial, Lizzie Borden, changed her story multiple times, she was inconsistent. Borden also had a history of stealing from her stepmother and would often blame someone else (Hartselle, 2013). During the trial she showed no emotion about her parents having been murdered (Hartselle,
Plus, she also tried to buy poison, but thankfully failed. Was that almost the way she was going to murder? Lizzie had an argument with her parents, just one week before the murders and chose to stay in a separate home for four days. Adding on to having an argument, just a few days before the murders, Lizzie tried to buy toxins. Although the police could not present the purchasing in the trial and the idea that all families have frenzied arguments, Lizzie definitely is guilty.
I have done enough research to know that there are three reasons why Lizzie didn’t commit this hideous crime. There were other people home at the time of the murder. The night before the murder John Morse, the uncle, showed up unexpectedly. In her statement to the police, Lizzie was outside at the time of the murder, so she wasn’t in the
Lizzie and her parents had a strong, devoted, and long-standing relationship, making a motive for murder unlikely. There is no incriminating evidence such as blood found on Lizzie. In addition, other possible suspects
She couldn’t be in the barn because Bridget Sullivan would have seen her whilst running between the windows and the barn to refill her pail. The same goes for if Lizzie was outside. All of theses defenses that seem to have all happened at the same time are proof that Lizzie is guilty for murdering her parents. Even if they were made up due to Morphine, the very first one she gave, being in the barn getting a piece of iron was definitely a white lie, because neighbors and the maid have seen
Lizzie Bordens case left the world shocked and confused. People didn't know what to believe since there was lack of forensic evidence making it harder for police to convict her of the murder. In court, A.V. Jennings (Lizzie Borden's Defense) argued, “there is not one particle of direct evidence in this case from beginning to end against Lizzie A. Borden. There is not a spot of blood, there is not a weapon they have connected with her in any way, shape or fashion.” Some people still believed she was guilty and never accepted her in the community.
One’s emotions are not drastically stricken or changed when a stranger speaks well of another stranger, specially not when a bad impression has already been formed. The writer of the article “Lizzie Borden: Her School and Later Life – A Noble Woman, Though Retiring”, published in the Boston Herald, attempts to do just that. Lizzie Borden was being accused of murder and the writer sought to prove, through an extensive analysis of her appearance, that Lizzie could not be guilty. The authors use of faulty logic and emotional appeal leads him to focus on outward appearance, due to the lack of substantial knowledge, and thus the articles superficial argument does no good in proving Lizzie Borden’s innocence.
For one, there was no physical evidence linking Lizzie to the murders, and no murder weapon was ever found. Furthermore, there were conflicting witness statements about Lizzie's whereabouts at the time of the murders, which suggested that she may not have been in the house when they occurred. Finally, Lizzie had no prior history of violence or criminal behavior, which made it difficult to believe that she would suddenly become a cold-blooded killer. So, was Lizzie Borden guilty or innocent?
In Lizzie Borden: Murderess or Media Sensation it states that “There was no physical evidence linking her to the murders” There was no evidence that she did the murders. They didn't question anybody but Lizzie. Anyone could have done it. This just proves that Lizzie did not do