Is it justified to brutally murder a progressive supporter of civil rights for stating their beliefs in a positive and peaceful way? In the case of Malcolm X, supporters of the Nation of Islam thought it was. Malcolm X was assassinated on February 21st 1965. He was getting ready to deliver a speech in the Audubon Ballroom in New York City. As he began to speak, he was shot several times in the chest by three men believed to be members of the Nation of Islam. He was rushed to the hospital, but was pronounced dead a few minutes after the attack (Kihss).
The assassination of Malcolm X was unjust because he was a great leader who wished for a positive change in American society and was rapidly changing his views to fit a more peaceful stance; however, when he discarded many of the Nation of Islam’s views in favor of more traditional Islamic views, the Nation of Islam believed his new ideals were putting their organization in jeopardy.
The Malcolm X’s assassination was sorely unjust because he was a great leader who wished for a positive change in American society. During the 1960s, the civil rights movement was in full swing, and one of the most influential leaders during this time was Malcolm X. He was an idol for many African-Americans during that time, a great debater, a powerful public speaker, his followers looked up to him and embraced his “the
…show more content…
After a pilgrimage to Mecca, Malcolm realized that what the Nation of Islam’s teachings did not reflect the more peaceful views traditional Muslims had. His opinions on civil rights shortly before his death reflected that of Martin Luther King Jr., He began to embrace peaceful protests and publicly announced how his trip had shown him what was right and that the Nation of Islam was doing was wrong, he wished for people of all races to peacefully accept each
This book brings together some of the best primary sources on Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X that relate to what I’ve learned in history class. Through their writings and speeches, I appreciate the roles they played in the freedom crusade of the 1950s and 1960s. It is a good summary of its essential teachings that give me insight into their individual styles and personalities. The book is not one that tries to force ideas or a religion on the reader but instead offers new insight on two of these most important civil rights leaders of the century. It is a valuable effort that helps me both within and beyond the classroom, which focuses on the crucial years in the lives of quintessentially human
For many African Americans, February 21, 1965, is engraved in their memory as profoundly as the assassination of John F Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr is for other Americans. In the turbulent aftermath of his death Malcolm X's disciples embraced the slogan black power and elevated him to secular sainthood by tonight late 1960s he had come to embody the very idea of Blackness for an entire generation like web Dubois Richard Wright and James Baldwin he had denounced the psychological and social costs that racism had imposed upon his people he was also widely admired as a man of uncompromising action the polar opposite of the nonviolent middle-class oriented negro leadership that had dominated the Civil Rights Movement before him Malcolm was
and also admitted to killing Malcolm. The other two men pleaded that they were insistent and they had nothing to do with the assassination. All were convicted of the murder of Malcolm x, they were sentenced 20 years to life. Muhammad Abdul was realised 19 years (1985) after the assassination and Kahlil Islam was released 21 years (1985)after the assassination. Hagan talks to parole officers and says, “the NOI had nothing to do with the assassination and that they took it into thair own hands.”
He didn’t need to be violent to get his point across. He could get the job done by being peaceful. Malcolm X’s assassination was unjust because he was helping those that were around him by ending racism. Every time Malcolm spoke to the public he was one step closer to accomplishing his dream. He was one step closer to freeing African American from the chains of racism.
During the civil rights movement there were multiple activist who were considered heroes of their generation. Unfortunately, Malcolm X was considered “controversial” even among other activist due to his more aggressive forms of protest and riots. Although
but when he got in jail, he joined the nation of Islam and changed his name to Malcolm X. Also at first, believe it or not he was originally opposed to the civil Rights Movement, but when he met Mr.King he changed his mind and left the nation of Islam. Then, started his own organization unfortunately, he was assassinated 1965.
Malcolm X did a variety of things which made him the most influential figures known today. He was also a great leader and his talent was realized by a leader
He believed in methods that were unheard of during his time and he left his mark in history as an empowered civil rights activist. West believes that through black rage, using psychic conversion, and trying to rid of double-consciousness Malcolm X dreamed of not only eliminating white supremacy but a brighter future for black
Philosophical differences between martin luther king and malcolm X The philosophical differences between Martin Luther King and Malcolm X have to do with the their protest strategies. MLK never fought with violence. Although he would get physically attacked, he stood his ground and continued to fight for equality peacefully. King believed that whites and blacks should come together to end the hate and violence.
Malcolm X didn’t agree with what King’s views, he believed that MLK’s dream was not a dream but a nightmare. Martin Luther King Jr’s approach to civil rights and equality was non-violent protesting, sit-ins, and getting as much people together as possible while not using violence. However, Malcolm X’s approach to this was almost the opposite. He was against the views of whites and he was willing to do whatever was needed to achieve
Malcolm X was an American Muslim leader who contributed to the Civil Rights Movement by spreading his ideas of black nationalism in the 1950s and early ’60s. He was an influential figure in a black Islamic organization, Nation of Islam, and served as a spokesperson for the organization. He was assassinated on February 21, 1965 while making a speech in Harlem. After his death, his life story was made well-known through his autobiography, The Autobiography of Malcolm X (1965) (Mamiya 1). Malcolm X is a man whose background and activism contributed to the Civil Rights Movement and America as a whole.
Thesis: In “The Autobiography of Malcolm X”, Malcolm X in his telling of his life to Alex Haley uncovers the theme of positive and negative environments unearthed by the interaction of African Americans and White Americans in his life and what those kinds of environments inherently produce. Annotated Bibliography Nelson, Emmanuel S. Ethnic American Literature: an Encyclopedia for Students. Greenwood, An Imprint of ABC-CLIO, LLC, 2015.This encyclopedia points out that the negative interaction he held with the white man as a young hustler was countered by these same experiences pushing Malcolm X to reclaim his “African identity”. This shows, as described by the cited work, what a man pushed by his negative interactions with the oppressive white men is willing to do to find his identity (i.e. through hustling).
Introduction: Malcom X urges the Negro community to fight to gain the equal rights they deserve by taking action against their white oppressors. He emphasizes that blacks will gain their rights either thorough voting, with the ballot, or else through the inevitable violence with the bullet. Thesis [part a] Like Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., also fighting for the civil rights of black Americans in the 1960s, but in a more peaceful manner, Malcom X takes a different approach.
Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. were both two African American civil rights activists who were very prominent throughout history. They fought for what they believed in but in vastly different ways. Martin Luther King Jr. was born to a middle class family and was well educated. Malcolm X, on the other hand, grew up in a rather hostile environment with barely enough schooling. Both their speeches, “I Have a Dream” and “The Ballot or the Bullet” may have shared some common traits, but at the same time, differed greatly in various aspects.
The most important decision of a leader is the style of leading they decide to use when inspiring others, or providing a vision for the future. By looking at the past, it is proven that some leadership styles are guaranteed to be more effective than others. The leadership style of Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X during the Civil Rights provides significant evidence of how different styles of leading can turn out to be a major success or defeat. Malcolm X’s leadership style included using violence to protest against violence and unequal rights, as well as supporting the segregation of African Americans and the whites. Martin Luther King’s style included nonviolent marches and protests against violence, and peacefully fighting for integrating