ipl-logo

Was The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified Essay

498 Words2 Pages

The United States and Japan would engage in a fierce conflict following Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor. Japan's resistance to surrender was evident in the battles for Okinawa and Iwo Jima. The fact that Japanese soldiers were willing to die for their nation's victory put doubt on the United States' claim to victory. The US would make nuclear bombs trying to force Japan's surrender. Then on August 6, 1945 the US would drop a nuclear bomb on Hiroshima and after three days on August 9, 1945 the US would drop one more nuclear bomb on Nagasaki. It has been debated whether or not the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were justified ever since they were dropped. Some people think that the bombings were immoral and unnecessary, but it's important to think about why they were made. President Truman's approval of the bombs would result in the survival of American and Japanese lives and Japan's surrender. …show more content…

The estimated number of American casualties for an invasion of Japan was around one million, according to the 1945 Ayers Papers. This number doesn't take into incorporate the likely loss of Japanese lives. It is estimated that the use of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki prevented the loss of between 250,000 and 500,000 American lives in an invasion. This assertion is also supported by Paul Fussell's book "A World War 2 Soldier," which asserts that the atomic bomb was the only means of swiftly ending the war and preventing additional casualties. Before the bombing of Hiroshima, the Japanese government had not shown any signs of surrender. It is accepted that the utilization of the nuclear bomb persuaded the Japanese that the conflict was unwinnable, and they gave up not long

Show More
Related

  • Atomic Bombing Dbq

    1327 Words  | 6 Pages

    However, this is a weak defence when taking Japan’s imminent defeat and peace efforts, as well as the likelihood of Japan’s surrender before the land invasion, into consideration. Furthermore, the usage of the bombs only accelerated the surrender of an already defeated enemy and resulted in high civilian casualty rates. This, along with the ulterior motives in the bomb’s usage, undermines any kind of justification even further. The usage of the atomic bombs was both highly immoral and militarily unnecessary, and had no function in bringing the war to an

    Read More

  • Potsdam Declaration Dbq

    227 Words  | 1 Pages

    As the Japanese forces were considered the aggressors of the conflict by the Allies and Japanese veterans alike, the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified. Their aggression previous to the bombing was demonstrated through the attack on Pearl Harbour, which led to America’s involvement in World War II. The attack was not one born out of vengeance and was not strategically logical, whereas there was a reason behind the bombing of Hiroshima, that reason being that the Japanese military would not agree to the clauses presented in the Potsdam Declaration. This declaration was given to the military officials as an invitation to surrender before the first bombing, providing ample time for them to make a decision to hopefully end the

    Read More

  • Hiroshima Vs Nagasaki Dbq

    184 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the United States, it is often taught that the use of nuclear weapons in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was the deciding factor for the Japanese to surrender during World War II. However, upon closer inspection that may not be the reason why. For example, by the time both cities were destroyed Japan had already lost dozens of cities to American fire bombs and conventional raids. As a result, the only difference between the cities that were previously burned and Hiroshima and Nagasaki was the type of weapon used. Therefore,the Japanese government was aware and accustomed to loosing cities and large number of civilian lives.

    Read More

  • Essay On Was The Us Justified In Dropping The Bomb On Japan

    728 Words  | 3 Pages

    was not justified in dropping the bomb on Japan. In the first place, the bombing was not meant to be a harmful weapon, instead it was meant to protect people. According to the article, when the bomb was created, the purpose of it was to be a deterrent and to intimidate other countries, so they would not attack the U.S. This proves how the bomb was supposed to be a defensive weapon for any possible attack on the U.S.. In addition, the bombing was an inhumane to do.

    Read More

  • Dbq Essay On Hiroshima And Nagasaki

    642 Words  | 3 Pages

    On the clear mornings of August 6 and 9, 1945, the first atomic bombs were dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagaski. Gigantic clouds of ominous dark smoke stained the sky, signaling the end of a seemingly incessant war. Americans and Europeans rejoiced throughout the world; many lives were spared from the brutality of continuing the war. Although this was an extremely hard decision to make and the results were devastating, the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a military necessity. To begin, America had already seen how ruthless and cruel the Japanese could be.

    Read More

  • Was The Atomic Bomb Justified Dbq Essay

    1322 Words  | 6 Pages

    Women and children were killed, and entire cities were erased from existence. This clear lack of respect and ethical reasoning highlights that there were more negatives than benefits of the bombs. Document 8 says, “The record of General Macarthur’s operations from 1 March 1944 through 1 May 1945 shows 13,742 US killed compared to 310,165 Japanese killed.” These numbers support the fact that the number of Japanese casualties far exceeded that of America. The decision to drop the atomic bomb added to this total, and made the comparison between American and Japanese deaths even more striking.

    Read More

  • Dbq Essay On Hiroshima And Nagasaki

    517 Words  | 3 Pages

    Moreover, as document 6 indicates through a letter from a soldier who fought in the Pacific, many believed that deploying the bomb saved countless American lives and facilitated an end to World War II. According to various arguments put up by supporters of the bombing, it can be inferred that the usage of atomic bombs was an essential and justified action. The belief is that Japan would have prolonged the war further, potentially costing many more lives. Additionally, the attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki made Japan sorry for initiating conflict, and eventually led to

    Read More

  • Hiroshima And Nagasaki Dbq Essay

    498 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Document 2, Admiral Leahy says, “The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender.” Some Americans felt as though the weapon should not have been used because the Japanese were ready to give in. COME BACK Not only were the Japanese ready to surrender but it was morally wrong to bomb multiple cities without realizing what the outcomes may be.

    Read More

  • Hiroshima And Nagasaki Bombing Dbq Essay

    1240 Words  | 5 Pages

    The United States did try to verbally reason with and even warn the Japanese, but they refused to surrender this easily. Japanese kamikaze occurred more and more and America needed to stop the destruction and interfere with the hopes of the Japanese to win. Without the immediate Japanese surrender following the bombings, American lives would have been lost on the battlefields of the continuation of the war. The bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki ended many lives; therefore, the intentions behind them were and are still remarkably controversial. Undoubtedly, these attacks were military necessities and the consequences of them not occurring would have been far worse than the consequences that prevalently took

    Read More

  • Was The Atomic Bomb Justified Dbq Essay

    685 Words  | 3 Pages

    Japan also attacked the U.S ships in the Pacific Theater using Kamikaze pilots (Doc. C). Japan also showed the U.S they were willing to kill themselves and sacrifice their own people to destroy Americans. The U.S offered an ultimatum but Japan refused it and didn’t accept the terms (Doc. I). In the same way as the ultimatum, there were also many warnings. At the point in the war before the droppings, surrendering was a clear option.

    Read More

  • What Was The Impact Of New Technology Dbq

    939 Words  | 4 Pages

    WWII was close to an end with the Allied forces winning, however Japan would refuse to surrender to the U.S. That was when a new weapon at the time, an atomic bomb, was in the hands of the U.S and was experimented with. The bomb was launched at a city in Japan called Hiroshima and demolished it. This issue of new technology affected the people of Hiroshima by causing many deaths and everlasting destruction, similar to WWII. Document 2 states how the city’s rivers were filled with corpses of people desperately seeking water and destroyed buildings. The people of Japan were wondering how a single bomb could do that much damage considering a standard bomb used in war could never be that powerful.

    Read More

  • Should We Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay

    852 Words  | 4 Pages

    Japan had to accept unconditional surrender; if they disagreed with that request, America would drop the bomb. What made the Japanese surrender was the retention of their emperor; anything else couldn’t have forced a Japanese surrender, including the attack of the atomic bomb. As Japan's Prime Minister Suzuki spelled out on June 9, 1945. “Should the Emperor system be abolished, they [the Japanese people] would lose all reason for existence…. [and have] no choice but to go on fighting to the last man” (Butow).

    Read More

  • Why Was Hiroshima Justified

    1840 Words  | 8 Pages

    There are many reasons why it could be argued that the dropping of the atomic bomb was justified. One reason is that Japan was warned, they were given plenty of opportunities to surrender such as the Potsdam declaration. The Declaration was issued to Japan by President Truman and the Allies of America after America had tested the Atom bomb on July 26th. The declaration was a proposition of surrender to Japan that linked directly to the dropping of the atomic bomb.

    Read More

  • Atomic Bomb Justified Dbq

    882 Words  | 4 Pages

    Afterwards, the United States declared war on Japan, and joined allies against the axis powers. The United States’ use of the atomic bombs is justified because it saved American lives; Japan was given fair warning, and their aggressions towards the U.S. The atomic bombs on Japan saved many American lives. Document 15 reads: The entire population of Japan is

    Read More

  • The Atomic Bomb Argumentative Essay

    581 Words  | 3 Pages

    President Truman and his associates believed that if they dropped the bomb they would receive surrender from Japan. Thus, saving millions of American lives, and ending the war. Nevertheless, by saving American lives they would sacrifice thousands of Japanese civilians. They had other idea to have Japan to surrender, but were willing to take the one that would have the most consequences. They were thinking too much about the US instead of creating actually peace within the nations.

    Read More

More about Was The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified Essay

Open Document