ipl-logo

Was The Us Justified Dbq Research Paper

776 Words4 Pages

During the 1940s, America was invested in a global war that lasted from 1939 to 1945; World War II. America first entered the war in 1941 and after four years of fighting in the war, it was clear that something needed to be done to end the war. After the death of Franklin D. Roosevelt, Harry Truman entered the presidency and it was up to him to oversee the end of the war. Truman, after the government of Japan ignored the demand for surrender at the Potsdam Conference, decided to use the atomic bombs to bring Japan to surrender. This controversial choice by Truman was not supported by everyone and brought America into an indefensible moral position. Despite this opposition, the dropping of the atomic bomb was justified and succeeded in bringing …show more content…

By July 1945, it was clear that Japan had been weakened by violent attacks, but there was no indication of any weakening of their determination to fight. In addition, the total strength of the Japanese Army was estimated to be close to 5,000,000 men, which posed an even greater threat to the United States (Blanche M. Touhill, 452). In order to end the war and bring down this large, determined army, the Potsdam Declaration was created. This ultimatum was designed to “spare the Japanese people from utter destruction”, as said by Truman (Kevin B., 605). This rejection shows that the Japanese army and government were aware of the possible dangers of the continuation of war and their choice to decline to surrender. This declination led to the demonstration of the ultimatum, to which the atomic bomb served as a suitable weapon. This atomic bomb was first introduced to Roosevelt and the American government in 1939 by a letter written by Albert Einstein. This letter warned Roosevelt of the potential creation of bombs through uranium, specifically the potential creation in …show more content…

When America had dropped the atomic bomb, Japan was in a very weakened state. The navy and air force were destroyed, the land had been surrounded by other armies, and the supplies had been cut off (David M., 421). By these observations, it can be concluded that Japan was in a position much weaker than the had been at the start of the war and recognition of defeat could be seen. This defeat, however, was not declared by Japan and they continued to decline to surrender. Their decline to surrender ultimately led the need of the atomic bombs. Although this atomic bomb appeared to be needed, it was seen to be an immoral instrument of destruction by many. The Nippon Times had stated, “This is not war; this is not even murder, this is pure nihilism. This is a crime against God and humanity which strikes at the very basis of moral existence” (David M., 419). In addition, there was no advantage of hurling the bomb without announcing the possession of it to Japan. Through this announcement, Japan may have been more aware of the true power America had and may have resulted in them surrendering (David M., 421). Nonetheless, this power was threatened by the United States in the Potsdam Declaration, which was pushed aside by Japanese officials, ergo defeating the argument against dropping the

Show More
Related

  • Atomic Bombing Dbq

    1327 Words  | 6 Pages

    Taking Japan’s impending surrender into consideration, the usage of the atomic bombs was militarily unnecessary and immoral. Further, it lead to the extensive loss of civilian life, therefore making these bombings justifiable only to a lesser extent. However, supporters of the bombings generally are of the opinion that they were instrumental in the Japanese surrender. These supporters also believe

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of The Winning Weapon? By Author Ward Wilson

    609 Words  | 3 Pages

    In The Winning Weapon? : Rethinking Nuclear Weapons in Light of Hiroshima, author Ward Wilson attempts to make the argument that Japan did not surrender from WWII because of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima. But rather that the invasion of the Soviet Union was the deciding factor in their withdraw. He then uses this argument to indicate that our views on nuclear weapons, and how they affected Japan’s military decisions is incorrect. Wilson begins his argument looking at the Japanese’s military and political standing prior to the bombing of Hiroshima.

    Read More

  • Was The Us Justified Dbq Research Paper

    1963 Words  | 8 Pages

    Furthermore, the use of the atomic bomb convinced the world of its horror and prevented future use when nuclear weapons became more accessible, it also displayed our military might to other threatening and powerful countries. To conclude, the United States was justified in using the atomic bomb since it brought the war to an end, saved even more Japanese and American lives from being lost, and resulted in the restriction of nuclear weapons being used in the

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Dbq On Hiroshima And Nagasaki

    769 Words  | 4 Pages

    This led America to attempt to prevent the Soviet Union from building an empire by showing their strength in the war. In the Yalta Conference, although the Soviet Union promised to assist America in the Pacific Theatre, the United States had to refuse their support in the war because it would have showed that they were weak (Lecture Notes). They could not seem as if they needed help to defeat Japan. The American army could not have requested for the aid from the Soviet Union for a war they had already had full control of against Japan (Document 3). The United States obligated themselves to manage the war with no assistance to show the Soviet Union that they were the ruling power of the

    Read More

  • How Did The Us Dropped The Atomic Bomb Dbq

    1248 Words  | 5 Pages

    This decision also sent the message that the United States will go at any lengths to stop what they perceive as “bad” or “evil” (communism) and would help start the Cold War as Russia began to develop true “evil” with their bombs. Along with the war in Japan practically over, making the USSR manageable for the U.S makes the claim

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb

    743 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender.” (Leahy, I Was There) Leahy goes on to say, “wars cannot be won by destroying women and children.” He and others who disagree with Truman’s decision argue that Japan was already going to surrender to America.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bombs

    560 Words  | 3 Pages

    In 1945 the United States was faced with an extremely difficult decision, this decision would bring a beginning to the “nuclear age” and end world war 2 but was it worth it. The decision to drop the atomic bombs on Japan is thought to have been done to prevent the loss of an estimated 200,000 American troops; the bombs were an alternative to occupation/invasion . The first crucial point to consider is the alternative options available to the United States to achieve victory in the Pacific Theater; the two primary Alternatives were a full-scale invasion of Japan or a Prolonged blockade. Both of these options would have likely resulted in Far higher casualties on both sides and an invasion of Japan would have exposed countless soldiers to brutal Warfare, leading to a catastrophic loss of life.

    Read More

  • Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

    676 Words  | 3 Pages

    Japan was weakening, “The food situation gradually becoming worse and worse…” Stated in source H. America had many industrial resources to use against Japan and so Japan had essentially been defeated. Japan pushed only for the sake of their countries honour as the shame of unconditional surrender goes against their code of honour. Furthermore a warning was given to Japan with America promising to drop the atomic bomb, however there was no evidence and so it could have easily been deemed a bluff. An American nuclear scientist stated, “A demonstration of the bomb best be made… Japan could then be asked to surrender.” This source seems somewhat reliable as it is from one of the American scientists and they would know the strength of the bomb.

    Read More

  • Should We Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay

    852 Words  | 4 Pages

    In fact, Ralph A. Bard, Undersecretary of the Navy wrote to Secretary of War Stimson in a June 27, 1945 memorandum. “I define this decision as an emotional and reckless decision, Japanese government may be searching for some opportunity which they could use as a medium of surrender” (Bard). In fact, the Japanese government expressed desire to end the war, and would have accepted conditional surrender before the mainland invasion in November. The reason for dropping the bomb was forcing Japan to surrender unconditionally. In America’s opinion, Japan had lost the war; they did not have any capital to negotiate with.

    Read More

  • Why Was Hiroshima Justified

    1840 Words  | 8 Pages

    If Japan agreed to the declaration, America would not drop the atomic bomb and Japan would

    Read More

  • Summary Of Leo Szilard's Last Resort

    715 Words  | 3 Pages

    However, if Japan was offered the opportunity to surrender and refused, then the decision to use the bomb should be reassessed (Szilard, “A Petition”). “A Petition to the President of the United States” by Leo Szilard provides a strong claim against the use of the atomic bomb supported by establishing credibility,

    Read More

  • Atomic Bomb Justified Dbq

    882 Words  | 4 Pages

    This document conveys that the Japanese wouldn’t back down after multiple warnings, instead they were getting stronger, and therefore the atomic bombs were justified because they were given fair warnings that they did not take it

    Read More

  • The Atomic Bomb Argumentative Essay

    581 Words  | 3 Pages

    President Harry Truman gave an executive order in 1945 to drop to atomic bombs in popular downtown cities in Japan. With the guidance of many scientists and political leaders President Truman made the extremely tough decision to drop the bombs. After listening to arguments from both sides President Truman came to the conclusion that dropping bombs would be the best thing to do for this war. It would also show that the United States had an extreme military power. Many American politicians were for the idea of dropping the bomb, because they believed that it was the only way to end the war and get Japan to surrender.

    Read More

  • Hiroshima Bombing Research Paper

    970 Words  | 4 Pages

    Reactions in Japan from relief to anger to sorrow but some say the bombings had made it possible for the Japanese to surrender with honour. Other critics have argued that “By August 1945 the war was practically over and Japan was ready to surrender, therefor the atomic bombs caused grossly unnecessary suffering mostly for innocent civilians.” But the evidence from the text rightly confirms that without the use of the Atomic Bombs Japan would have continued to fight, and more innocent lives would have been lost. Therefore use of the atomic bombs may have caused absolutely devastating effects but ultimately gave Japan a reason to surrender with honour and save millions of

    Read More

  • The War In Germany: A Case Study

    2080 Words  | 9 Pages

    The War in Germany was over, and fighting continued only throughout the Pacific Islands, where American troops were “island hopping” frenziedly in an effort to finally vanquish the Japanese. The Japanese tactics were simple; they did not cease fighting until they won, and their Kamikazes, the original suicide bombers, sunk hundreds of American ships. The United States, tired of incessant violence, issued the Potsdam Declaration, which outlined the consequences that the Japanese would face should they refuse to surrender, it however was ignored. Meanwhile, just months after the European theater of the war ended, the infamous atomic weapons had been completed and were ready for use. Everything was coming to the end.

    Read More

More about Was The Us Justified Dbq Research Paper

Open Document