Software development models
Water fall model
The waterfall model is a simple method that is easy to use and understand. In the water fall method each part of a project must be completed one step after another, the steps for the waterfall method are specifying the requirements, design, implementation, testing, debugging, installation and maintenance. Due to the structure of the model each phase has specific tasks to complete making it easier to structure work this also ensures that the phases don’t overlap. The waterfall method works well for smaller projects where the requirements are well understood.
The water fall method is less suited to larger projects as the requirements may change or there may be an error found during testing that means
…show more content…
Prototypes are often used in addition to or sometimes even in place of design specifications.
RAD is best for creating user interfaces. GUI builders are often called rapid application development tools. Other forms of rapid development are adaptive, agile and spiral.
RAD has 4 phases; (1) the requirements planning phase which uses both system analysis and planning then the entire project team discus the needs, scope, constraints, and system requirements. (2)user design phase users work with system analysts to create to prototypes, the two continue to make prototypes in till they are happy with a working model,(3) construction phase is when the program is made by the programmers and then tested.(4)cutover phase is where the final tasks are completed and the final product is delivered.
Agile methodologies
Are approaches to software development where requirements and solutions change continuously through the development life cycle its best for adaptive planning, evolutionary development, early delivery, and continuous improvement, it also encourages rapid and flexible response to
…show more content…
It is also known as a software development life cycle. Most development processes can be described as agile, waterfall, prototyping, iterative, incremental, spiral development, rapid application development, and extreme programming.
Some people consider a life-cycle model a more general term for a category of methodologies and a software development process a more specific term to refer to a specific process chosen by a specific organization. For example, there are many specific software development processes that fit the spiral life-cycle model.
Adaptive software development
Is a software development process that grew out of rapid application development (RAD). It uses the principle that continuous adaptation of the process to the work at hand is the normal state of affairs.
A DFD shows what kind of information will be input to and output from the system, how the data will advance through the system, and where the data will be stored. It does not show information about process timing or whether processes will operate in sequence or in parallel, unlike a traditional structured flowchart which focuses on control flow, or a UML activity workflow diagram, which presents both control and data flows as a unified
Computer-aided software
These methods help us ouline our experiment and futher get our
The process of altering or adjusting old schemes to fit new information and experiences is
Some of these techniques include the use of
However, these methods would not be put into
Superior Court I implemented Asynchronous JavaScript and XML and REST applications for the Court Management Interactive Voice Recognition system and Case filing that supports over 10,000 queries daily. I also led the effort for deploying Windows Containers on Nano servers for pilot programs and production web applications for the D.C. Superior Court utilizing Microsoft Azure Cloud services, resulting in over $300,000 of cost saving. I also demonstrated my expertise by ensuring that program libraries and web application frameworks were properly documented allowing developers to build, reuse, test, and deploy complex web applications in an effective and efficient manner. Developed and implemented Enterprise wide System Development Life Cycle and Agile Software Development Model for the Department of Homeland Security and the DC Superior Courts that provide a structed process for application requirements, architectural design, testing, and bug fixing, release, deployment, and maintenance. Enabled Continuous Delivery and testing (CD) strategies utilizing Jenkins and IBM Rational solutions for version control, issue tracking, functional, and security testing.
i also thoug it be a interesting topic as one method takes place in town. thank you for your time. Sincerely, Sally A. Lopez
Chapter 7 is to discuss the actual implementation and issues found during the experiment. The number of issues that were found during the project will be discussed in this chapter. Types of issues that will be discussed, are component issues, integration issues and construction issues. A cost summary of the components that were bought, will be shown in this chapter. 7.2 COMPONENT AND INTEGRATION
Iterative and incremental approach is a better way of developing requirements and modules as well. 4. Requirements provide a complete operating picture of the solution, which helps in taking correct decisions during initial stages of software development life cycle (SDLC). Iterative and Incremental Approach This approach allows us to make changes before it is too late.
Requirements Gathering – 4 weeks This is the investigative stage of the project. which involved conception, initiation and analysis of the problem. Design phase – 3 weeks This stage involves translating the requirements from the previous stage into detailed designs that address them.
Explain your recommendation. Since most of the functionality is known for this application and there are few moving parts, I would recommend using the traditional waterfall approach. I base this decision on the following factors: 1. The system is of low to medium complexity and most of the functionality can be achieved through well- documented and widely-used technologies. Hence, the design of the application could factor in most of these technologies and the development team could come up with a more detailed and finalized approach for the system.
This approach centers on people, communications, the anticipated product and its flexibility. The concept of this approach is similar to that of the traditional management approach: generating plans and requirements, evolving the anticipated product, incorporating it with other products as required then testing it and debugging technical hitches if any is found, then lastly fitting it for use (Rose, 2010). In this approach, as a replacement for focusing on the phases all at once like it is done in the traditional approach, the entire project is fragmented into smaller segments known as scrums after which the scrums are taken as smaller projects and dealt with according to the traditional
• Gain maximum understanding from tools & prototypes etc. • Make frequent Prototypes & reduce the time taken for development Process. • Early involvement of the suppliers at design process. Strategic Recommendations • Company can use the Benchmarking Technique. • Company can work on to decrease the Lead time at Development Process.
It is important to emphasize that these challenges were brought about by poorly defined goals and the scope was usually unclear. This meant the projects usually tended to go beyond the estimates as the project developers tried to fix newly developed ideas in to the development process. the phase gate model was developed to give an outline of the project development process to offer solutions for managing newly launched
Process Strategies The process strategies, for such a large manufacturing company, would need to be varied. The production process type would be determined by the product life cycle stage at that time (Thayer 2004).Product life cycles for items such as smartphones and tablets do not generally follow the standard life cycle stages. The maturity stage can be interrupted by discontinuation or irrelevance of a technology, which recommences the cycle (Giachetti & Marchi 2010). Incidentally, during the product life cycle of these items, a cyclic improvement of both process and product is required to stay in contact with market changes.