You should have composted it because it would have a beneficial outcome for the environment. Composting is beneficial for the environment because it reduces the amount of trash going to landfills and keeps soil fertilized which will result in reducing the number of times that you need to water plants. First of all, composting reduces the amount of trash going to landfills. Composting is a great way to reduce trash going to landfills. Well what is composting!
Now imagine if there was an implemented cheap and efficient method to get rid of waste in schools. The answer to this question is Vermicomposting. Vermicomposting can reduce the amount of cafeteria waste that goes to the local disposal facility. Not only that but the byproduct of the red wiggler worms in vermicomposting is a great fertilizer which can be given back to farmers for profit or make a small garden for the school. Secondly, if schools aren 't transporting waste to landfill it would save gas and money, and it would also lower methane emissions.
"I would certainly not bathe a newborn child or a young infant in this bad water and if you can 't drink the bad water you shouldn 't pay for it." Bill Schuette said his office has begun investigating steps to provide financial support to the Flint residents. The people of Flint were also exposed to E. coli, chemical byproducts, Legionnaires ' disease and lead
To fully engage to why a shift in the ecosystem occurred, it is vital to understand how Native and European practices were much different. Europeans colonist did not recognize Natives way of life as the right way. Indians ways of changing the natural landscape was not familiar to Europeans. Natives farmed, but did not fence their land, and did not permanently stay in one place. When soil became depleted, the natives would change locations.
After seeing the horrific sanitation issues in the meat processing industry, the president decided that the government needed to step in and provide regulation. He also later signed the Pure Foods and Drugs Act, which banned the sale of food and drug which the government deemed unsafe for public consumption. But Roosevelt wasn’t done improving the public welfare. He strongly believed that the preservation of wilderness was crucial to America’s health and economy. He preserved over 230,000,000 acres of land, setting aside 150 protected forests, 51 federal bird reserves, 4 game reserves, and helping build 24 irrigation projects.
In the future, it may be equipped with genetically modified plants with mechanisms designed to prevent gene flow. This is important for the co-existence of GM and traditional crops, especially that medical and industrial use of genetically modified plants. Environmental indirect effects of genetically modified crops include changes in agricultural or environmental practices associated with new varieties. Whether the net effect of these changes had to be positive or negative on the environment is still controversial, calling for a more comparative analysis of new technologies and agricultural practices. The environmental benefits include less water pollution and less damage to non-target insects, in turn benefit biodiversity.
In this essay, I will argue how synbio vanilla can negatively impact the environment, why synbio vanilla food products should be labelled and how synbio vanilla can affect farmers in developing countries. I will also provide suggestions to improve the sustainability of natural vanilla in the long
This procedure would prevent the consumption of crops polluted by heavy metal or pesticides and earn time for the government to rehabilitate polluted soil. As a whole, these steps comprise the ideal solution to the soil pollution in China, but other interest groups think
The purpose of analyzing musculoskeletal problems in agricultural work was to know about the risk factors dangerous to health so that these can be avoided or diminished. The data of research can also be used while designing work and work environment or for preparing information materials and training programs which would be helpful in reducing musculoskeletal disorders, increase the efficiency of work and reduce costs on treatment of ailments occurring due to
This shows clearly the danger of the usage of poisonous pesticides or insecticides that the farming of genetically modified crops helps in avoiding the usage of such chemicals, therefore GMOs are considered to be ecofriendly. On the other hand, I disagree with such thought, because I believe that if pesticides and insecticides are used the way it should be done the poisoning of farmers and animals won’t be an issue. Moreover, I think that the usage of such poisonous chemicals should be used under the supervision of the responsible authority. Most of the poisoning incidents are results of the insufficient knowledge of the danger and the effects of such chemicals or even due to the of safety utensils (Philipps &Park, 2002, p.2). Another study showed that the technology of GMOs didn’t help in the reduction of the amount of pesticides used.
There are many instances of the EPA overstepping their abilities, and causing ordinary citizens undue harm. Take the story of Mr. and Mrs. Michael Sackett, of Priest Lake, Idaho. “The Sackett family sought to build a house on its half-acre of land, yet after construction broke ground, the EPA interfered, claiming the family violated the Clean Water Act by placing fill materials into “wetlands.” Their property was designated as a wetland, yet their neighbors have built houses on either side of their lot and their lot already has established sewage lines. Their lot does not harbor a lake, pond or stream, yet the EPA is requiring them to obtain a building permit that would cost more than the value of their land” (Paul). Thankfully, in the case of the Sacketts, the Supreme Court ruled against the EPA, and let the Sacketts build their house (Frank).
Those evident cannot be pulished due to the limation of this law. Currently in United State, 7 states have passed this bill. Bittman argue this bill does not protect animals and all farms should be regulated. I agree with Bittman. I do not think his argument is effective on the ag-gag law because his argument is mainly about regulation of