The Ways of Knowing are the methods used by us humans in order to acquire knowledge about the world around us and establish a relationship with this knowledge. Just like with the Areas of Knowledge, they are mostly interconnected and dependant on each other. The WOK’s play a crucial role in answering the question of how we gain knowledge of the world, and what are the advantages and disadvantages of each way in which we learn of the world and our place in it. Knowledge in a discipline is often taken as "command of a discipline to enable a smooth transition and contribution to professional and community settings”. This is, of course, achievable only when one knows the right WOK for his chosen field or discipline.
A knowledge issue is defined
…show more content…
First, we can know something is true because we trust the source of the information. For example, we may read a textbook or review a research study. We can also use references other than scientific studies such as religious literature (e.g., the Talmud, the Bible, the Koran, etc.) In both cases, the information has been revealed to us and we trust the source of the information. Second, we may know something is true through intuition or personal inspiration. We may feel strongly that we have been "guided" to truth through an insight that is unique and personal. A third way of knowing is through personal experience. This is often a powerful approach to many people. A
fourth way of knowing is through reason or thinking logically and critically about the first three.However, each of these ways of knowing is potentially flawed. We may read something from an otherwise credible source who has made a mistake relative to a particular issue. We may also have an inspiration that upon further investigation proves to be incorrect. The possibility of error through personal experience is well known by way of optical illusions. Such judgements also play a role in alternating our knowledge and its
Today's world is primarily based on facts. People believe that anything that has higher factual and scientific data has more legitimacy than the data with limited information. The legitimacy of any claims is totally based on the extent of information related to the field. However, that may not always be the case, and sometimes higher level of information related to any subject may cause the person to be confused and makes it harder for them to take any decision. In Blink, author Malcolm Gladwell brings the same concept in his book.
Gould remarks, “But certainty is also a great danger, given the notorious fallibility--and unrivaled power--of the human mind,” (Gould 1). Although Gould recognizes that his description of his memory is entirely wrong, he provides the example of how Elizabeth Loftus discovered that the mind is very powerful, but can at times fail to do its job properly. Therefore, in a way it was not entirely Gould’s fault for accidentally providing some falsify
Depending on the perspective of the fact can change comprehension of the belief, to justify a different
For example, most people believe the earth is round and research can support this claim. However, despite photographs depicting a spherical earth some critics believe that the earth is flat, like Golden State Warriors Draymond Green. Calculated facts can determine the truth, but people can still hold on, to what they find is their truth. Irwin brings polls of food into play when discussing what individuals and himself think is true or false. Like, an apple could be the favorite fruit of twenty-five percent of the population, but the other seventy-five percent might think apples are revolting (Irwin, 2016).
The search for knowledge is arduous, to utilize knowledge wisely can be blessings, but
It always prevails over ignorance, but, unlike ignorance, knowledge must be earned by working hard to learn unfamiliar and usually complicated teachings or ideas. Knowledge helps people to understand the world and creates a desire to learn more about it. Without knowledge, ignorance would obscure the complex nature of the world and cloud the beauty of the earth. Throughout the book The Chosen, knowledgeable characteristics are exhibited through Ruven Malter, David Malter, and Danny Sanders.
E.g Individuals are more likely to be accursed if they are a different race to the eyewitness testifier. This indicates that individuals are able to reshape, construct scenarios based on stereotypical believes unlike psyical or photographic evidence which is a relabel source to correctly use as a credible source of evidence. This is displayed in Allport and Postman experiment in 1947. Participants were asked to recall the opposite picture, participants were morvlikey to report a black male but this is incorrect as the image shows a white individual.
People do this to information by trying to put it in our schemas. Schemas can also question the reliability of eyewitness testimony, as they can cause distortion to memory or unconsciously modify information in order to relate with our current knowledge/ schemas. This can be seen in Bartlett’s study, where participants heard a story and had to recall and tell to another person, like “Chinese Whispers”. Each participant recalled the story in their individual interpretation such as; the passages became shorter, ideas and details of the story were modified. This suggests that each individual person reconstructs our own memories to conform to our personal beliefs about the world.
The Human Race has always felt in need for having consensus and disagreement in what concerns to knowledge. “Robust” knowledge itself can be defined as a type of ability that allows humans to apply it in their own world of things and at the same time be able to make use of it. The Greeks referred to this type of knowledge as techne. This essay will focus on the knowledge requirements and how different areas of knowledge rely on both consensus and disagreement to achieve a robust knowledge. History and Arts both in general need so much consensus as disagreement, to create the common goal of achieving what is call a higher level knowledge.
Whilst the knower’s perspective is always essential in the pursuit of knowledge, it’s essence is greater in some areas of knowledge than others. Perspective shapes both what we pursue in knowledge and it affects how we interpret pursued knowledge. Whilst the latter has greater influence over subjective areas such as the arts and history, the former affects even the pursuit of knowledge in more objective areas such as the natural sciences and maths. What’s more, for knowledge to be knowledge, there must be a knower. Each individual knower gains knowledge through the ways of knowing reason and emotion (amongst others); these ways of knowing shape and are shaped by our perspective.
As said before, with perception we go to the ‘source’ and take our own conclusions of
Theory of Knowledge Essay “Without application in the world, the value of knowledge is greatly diminished.” Consider this claim with respect to two areas of knowledge. In contemporary society, it is often argued that the value of knowledge is determined by its application to the real life situations. I am of an emphatic opinion that without application, the value of knowledge certainly abates.
Evolve into Having Self-Awareness Being self-aware simply means that you have a keen understanding of your own personality. That includes your positive and negative traits, your thoughts and beliefs, your feelings, and your inspiration. It would be easier for you to understand others when you are self-aware. You will also be able to tell how they see you in return. Most people believe that they have a good sense of self-awareness, but it would be best to check at a comparative scale to see where you fall on it in contrast with others.
Teaching philosophy is described by Sadker and Sadker as, “Behind every school and every teacher is a set of related beliefs - a philosophy of education – that influences what and how students are taught. A philosophy of education represents answers to questions about the purpose of schooling, a teacher’s role and what should be taught and by what methods.” (Teacher, Schools and Society. 2005). With this definition in consideration, my teaching philosophy is “I believe that children learn best when they are given the chance to choose, discuss and explore what they want to learn, when they want to learn and how they want to learn.
Education is necessary for all students. It is a tool which can be used to enhance one's learning and to provide students with experiences inside the classroom to prepare them for later in their life. Teachers are an indispensable figure in the classroom and are called as leaders of the next generation. Everything done in the classroom helps develop children into the citizens they will become. It is essential to understand that students have difference in need, ability, and success rate, but they are all special in their own way.