Leaders are not only confined to the pages of literature, but in history as well. Winston Churchill, the former prime minister of Great Britain, pulled Great Britain by its strings at their darkest hours: World War II. After six years grueling fighting, Great Britain won on behalf of Churchill being a witty but somber orator whose encouraging speeches inspired the Britons to fight back. As a former soldier and general, he understood war at every angle, but he had to convince the rest of Great Britain into being soldiers as well. He was able to form a relationship with the Britons by expressing their sorrows and anger and turning it into productivity for the war in all of his speeches. One of his most favored speeches is the “We shall fight on the beaches” speech, which was presented to the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, but it was also broadcasted by BBC through the radio as well. Just hours before this speech, King Leopold of Belgium surrendered to Nazi Germany, which left many British soldiers stranded at Dunkirk on June 4th, 1940. While the Royal Navy saved most of the soldiers, the loss of the soldiers, supplies, and warfare made it a colossal disaster. (ABC-Clio). He had the arduous job of addressing the Great Britain of its loss whilst reminding them that they would still …show more content…
Even more so, Churchill uses the word “we” to unite the Britons, since victory could only be achieved with the entire nation working together. In just one conclusion, Churchill honors the soldiers and Royal Navy for their valor, asks the Britons for their contribution for the war to remain patriotic, and reminds everyone listening that victory is inevitable and that Great Britain will always remain
Throughout history there have been many world leaders. Theses leaders are people who have excelled in various fields. Usually a successful leader is a person who has been on a journey of some kind. A journey is defined as traveling from one place to another. Most successful leaders throughout history have traveled through difficult or trying situations.
Alexander Hamilton did just that. Though it can be hard to define what makes a great leader, by looking through history we can formulate an idea. We consider Alexander Hamilton an inspiring leader as he was one of the important pioneers in forming the American government. Also, after the Revolutionary War, he co-wrote the famous 'Federalist' Papers with John Jay and James Madison, which served as a primary source for Constitutional interpretation. Hamilton was a man of great intelligence and zeal, qualities which helped him become the legendary leader
On March 5th 1946, not even one year after the overwhelming victory of the Alliance over the Nazis in World War II, Winston Churchill, former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom at the time (1940 – 1945), was invited to deliver a speech at Westminster College, in Fulton, Missouri. It is commonly known as “The iron curtain speech”, but Churchill refers to it as “The Sinews of Peace” at the end of the same. This speech reflected his own personal opinion, and was aimed at the people of the United States of America, his countrymen across the Atlantic ocean and other nations. The nature of it is political, taking into consideration the historical context within it occurred: tensions between the Western Bloc (composed of the United States of America,
All great speeches have a purpose, either to rally the population, promote some idea or to encourage others. Winston Churchill’s Speech entitled “Their Finest Hour” has gone down in history as one of the greatest and most powerful speech of the Second World War. It was given in response to the fall of the France in the war, and helped establish the tone for the people of the United Kingdom, that despite the great loss, they still had hope to overcome the enemy forces. Churchill’s speech inspired patriotism, determination and hope. This speech was directed at all the people in the United Kingdom, to unite and to promise a better hope, despite of Hitler’s attempts at world domination and the victory of the Nazis in almost every battle in Europe.
King George III says “They say the price of my war’s not a price that they’re willing to pay”, saying that the British parliament were no longer going to fund the war. King George III was “now fighting with France and with Spain” so he had no choice but to give up America. The king goes on the ask “What comes next? You’ve been freed. Do you know how hard it is to lead?”, telling them that it’s hard governing on your own and “When your people say they hate you don’t come crawling back to me.”
I personally think that we all have a bit of Churchill’s leadership style in us. I can say although on a much smaller scale I feel that I would like to think I have some qualities of Churchill. For instance, I do think that one of my strong points as a leader is being, a transformational leader through inspirational motivation. I have had many opportunities to be an inspirational motivator as a First Sergeant. For example there was a situation where our First Sergeant Council was facing stagnant growth in our base community in regards to give back to our Airmen and we needed a change.
Just weeks later, with France in the midst of a Nazi invasion and British forces surrounded at Dunkirk, a decision had to be made: would the British reach a peace settlement with Hitler as suggested by Foreign Secretary Viscount Halifax and Neville Chamberlain, the leader of the Tories, or would the British stand and fight to the death as proposed by Winston Churchill? As we now know, the British decided to go with their new Prime Minister and continued to fight. Prior rips into Chamberlain for his wishes to make a peace settlement when he was Prime Minister, saying that Chamberlain’s belief that the British could reach a negotiated agreement with the Nazis showed an incomprehension of the enemy on Chamberlain’s behalf. Prior goes on to give strong, but fair praise to Churchill for how he handled his first days as Prime Minister. He was constantly being undermined by Halifax, who was working for intervention from the Italians for a peace settlement, even after it was becoming increasingly clear that the Italians would join sides with the Nazis.
Another piece of evidence Churchill gives is, “I say to the House as I said to ministers who have joined this government, I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears, and sweat. We have before us an ordeal of the most grievous kind. We have before us many, many months of struggle and suffering” (Churchill P9). This means he has fate, and that he has so much things to give so Germany can be nervous for what 's going
Churchill begins by giving context to the previous happenings of the war, in order to allow people to grasp the power of the German forces when it comes to invasion. Churchill states that “there has never been a period… of which we boast when an absolute guarantee against invasion… could’ve been given to our people”. One can’t be too overconfident about guarantees, because there is always a chance attached to them. However, Churchill reassures that the British naval and air powers can be exercised through preparation against “every kind of novel stratagem and every kind of brutal and treacherous maneuver”. These words
Winston Churchill helped change the outcome of the War. He had finally achieved the sweet moment of victory
“Announcing War Against Iraq” Have you ever heard a speech that has affected you or made an impact upon your life? Well, the speech on “Announcing War Against Iraq” by President George H.W. Bush affected the lives of millions of Americans. This speech was given on January 16, 1991 and uses three motives of influencing Americans on the war against Iraq. This speech is remarkable because it influenced many people. It is highly regarded today because it announced a war upon Iraq.
An Analysis of Churchill 's "Their Finest Hour" Speech Sir Winston Churchill was born to an aristocratic family in 1874, and he was the prime minister of the United Kingdom. Before becoming the prime minister of the United Kingdom, Churchill had a long career timeline. Churchill was a devoted citizen who loved and valued his country; and his entire previous career paved the way for him to take over the position of prime minister on May 10, 1940. The time on which Winston Churchill had delivered his "Their Finest Hour" speech was a time when Europe had witnessed the defeat of the French to the Germans. Churchill 's speech aimed at giving hope to the people and motivating them to keep fighting against the German army.
Winston Churchill, in his informational speech, “Their Finest Hour” (June 18th, 1940) explained the military situation and rallied his people for what he probably knew was going to be a tremendous struggle against the Axis. Winston Churchill supports his thesis through, rhetorical questioning, pathos, ethos and logos. Churchill’s purpose was to inform and rally the people in order to strengthen their confidence in Britain 's military. Churchill was addressing the people of Britain as he uses a formal tone, in explaining the military situation. Winston Churchill was born into an aristocratic family, on November 30, 1874 in Woodstock, United Kingdom.
Queen Elizabeth I’s Speech to the Troops at Tilbury Rhetorical Analysis In 1588, Queen Elizabeth I delivered her speech to the Troops at Tilbury to motivate them to victory during the upcoming battle against the Spanish Armada. During this time in England, Queen Elizabeth was an outcast compared to all the other royal leaders. Many people did not like her because of her religion being protestant. With that being said, it gave the Spanish Armada even more motivation to plan the attack on the kingdom.
Evidently, Churchill sought to influence his audience by conditioning their emotional responses to the situation and by provoking their sense of reason to the available facts regarding the impending war. Noteworthy is the fact that the first part of the speech is mainly logical in aspect whereas the second part focuses on emotional appeal. Technically, it would appear as though Churchill sought to clarify the facts of the situation by elaborately using logos before reinforcing his rational perspectives with an emotional elevation of the facts. The profundity of his impact on the audience depended on the combined effectiveness of factual representation of ideas and emotional