Standardized tests do affect the way teachers teach because they can only teach certain things and not what they think that the students might need. Do to standardized testing the teachers have to teach what is on their guide to teach the students. Yes, it does affect the way teachers teach their
We need to stop looking at the outward appearance and stereotyping and start looking at the students minds and intelligence. It is better to see the willingness to learn and know things not making assumptions of people. We should have high expectations for everyone and reading this really opened my eyes, we should all be taught the same way and have the abilities to learn to the highest levels whether it’s in Math or in subject or place, without being judged before that, they won’t do good or pass other
Maybe if they told us why it's super important we may just try to really do our best on the test. At the same time many teachers aren't sure why the test is important they are just told that we need to take them and it will count as a grade. If they don't know why we need to take it how would they know if it was really important on how it could affect our scores. So if the teachers can’t tell us what the test is about how do we know if it is really important or not. Some teachers would say every test is important but sometimes that's not true.
A standardized test, according to W. James Popham of ASCD.org, is “any examination that is administered and scored in a predetermined, standard manner.” In standardized testing, examinees are instructed to precisely answer a specific set of questions, which are usually multiple-choices. Although standardized testing is believed to be an objective method to grade students, administers should understand that these tests are not only a waste of time, but also a waste of money. Standardized testing is irrelevant to a student’s education because it is an unreliable way to measure a student’s knowledge, causes stress, and hinders a student’s overall learning potential. To begin with, standardized tests are not wholly reflective of a student’s knowledge.
However, she was able to provide a precise reason for that, saying that as it is still a good idea, since it concerns the issues of the whole class, but not individual students. In addition, she states, that however there is a vast amount of ready-made materials available, it would be better for a teacher to construct the test for his class on his own. There is also a very important issue to bear in mind. It is that it is crucial for a teacher not to ask too direct questions, so that students’ would not aim to reach expected or desirable results. The author could produce bright academic work, which is full of content.
Some simply try to memorize for test and quizzes. Others feel grades don’t reflect their intelligence and can make them feel worthless for a lot of students grades are taught to be so hyper-focused on grades that aren’t going to matter in the real world. If you bombed your statistics math final in 10th grade you’re not going to be expected to learn that material in college if you 're an English major. Getting good grades shouldn’t be the main focus in school, but wanting to learn and become a better educated, well-rounded person who truly is able to process the information they
This makes it harder for teachers to educate their classes when Common Core has left them to develop their own set of standards. “The standards identified the objectives the students should meet, while curricula detailed how they would meet them. Teachers could devise their own lesson plans for teaching their students, as long as the plans resulted in the students meeting the Common Core standards” (Common Core). States are now left with the decision on whether or not they should expand and elongate the Common Core standards, or just create a whole different set of standards that would equally educate the students. This has become a huge burden because some states are disregarding the Common Core curricula and are figuring out other ways to educate their students.
Proponents see standardized testing as a way of making testing more efficient and effective by minimizing cost and increasing people’s accountability for their performance in the system. Opponents on the other hand argue that the systems has limitations based on its very nature on what can be tested and as a result of these standards needing to be met sacrifice some very important aspects of students education experience as well as force onto students and teachers a one size fits all model that has failed to deliver on its promises. After having reviewed all the evidence in detail it becomes clear to me that standardized testing is not an effective system for educating students and does more bad than good
Standardized Testing hurts children who think in different ways. This is quoted by Valerie Strauss, who makes a great point by saying children can only learn by the way it 's taught and it cannot be learned from other sources. Standardized Testing limits what children can learn and how they learn. Schools also spend an extraordinary amount on testing that could be going to better education and more funding to arts and extracurricular activities. Although, some say standardized testing is beneficial to the way students learn, statistics show that this is simply not true, standardized testing adds unnecessary stress on students, suppresses their creativity, and limits the creativity of teachers.
This new learning approach is to make variety of choices and to utilize the advance technology in teaching and learning due to their emerging need in education. Mathematics teachers often avoid using technology in their teaching that makes the students to feel boring in learning of mathematics. Use of m-learning can make teaching attractive effective. Teachers and parents ought to be monitor learning of their children through the use of advance technology. Study was also included the demographic factor to find the association between respondents and readiness for