Wealth inequality in America is nothing new. It has been growing more and more over the decades. The rich are becoming richer and the poor are becoming poorer. Imagine, people are having to get up at six o’clock every morning and drive back and forth across town to work at three jobs they hate. People have to work multiple jobs because most places only hire part time and pay minimum wage. Even after working sixteen hour days people are still barely able to pay bills and can only eat sparingly to get by. The wealthy are getting wealthier because the government is creating laws that allow them pocket more money. As the wealth inequality increases it puts more burden on the middle class. The wealth inequality is growing in America and it keeps …show more content…
Since the minimum wage isn’t being raised, inflation has “cut the purchasing power of a minimum-wage worker’s paycheck by twenty percent” (Krugman 6). Inflation is stopping people from moving up in society because it is forcing minimum-wage workers to work multiple jobs in order to make ends meet. People have to live from pay check to pay check in order to pay bills and by enough groceries for the week. For example, Rebecca is working a forty hour work week earning $7.25 an hour. Before taxes she only makes $290. At the end of the month Rebecca has $1,160 gross pay. If taxes are set at fifteen percent Rebecca will only have $986 left. This is a very little amount considering all the expenses people have to pay. After bills and rent are paid for, people are left with nothing or next to nothing. Over time inflation will cause it to become harder to live because prices on everything will keep rising. When the minimum wage isn’t raised to compensate for inflation then people become stuck and are unable to move up in society because they have to pay more in order to live. If it costs more to live then minimum wage jobs become useless to move up in society because people are unable save money. Thus, minimum wage jobs will not help people move up in society and will continue to increase they wealth inequality between the rich and the …show more content…
Before Bush’s tax cuts the wealthy “paid about $27 million in estate taxes and contributed 39.6 percent of his dividend income in taxes. Once Bush’s cuts go into effect, he could inherit the whole estate tax-free and a tax rate of only fifteen percent on his stock earnings” (Krugman 7). Americans who are economically sound are able to invest their money into the stock market. If someone invests in the right company, they can become pretty wealthy doing nothing. In fact, someone can live off of the interest they make from the money they invested. For example, if Bill invests $1,000,000 and is promised to receive ten percent of that money back by the end of the year, Bill can make $100,000 doing nothing. This is a lot more than what average Americans make in a few years. Most of the time when someone dies, they leave their fortune to their children. Now that child can continue to live off the stock earnings and not have to work. The Bush tax cuts allows inheritors to pay less taxes on their investments and not have to pay taxes on an estate they inherited either. When taxes are cut on the wealthy then the middle class and the poor have to make up for the difference. This is a serious problem because the wealthy are able to earn more money off their stock earnings and not have to work while the middle class workers take home less money because they are forced to pay more in
In the article “Confronting Inequality” by Paul Krugman it explains how and why large changes between wages of wealth and the problems between the social classes. America's middle class in today’s society are exceeding their limits in effort to give their children opportunities many middle class parents did not have themselves. Ways that many middle class parents are doing this is by buying homes that they can't afford; this is so their children will be able to attend a good school. Another reason why middle class parent are doing this so that their children can have more opportunities to one day slow the growing gap between the wealthy and the poor. Another reason that inequality between the classes is important Krugman believes is because
When the government spends, there is more money flowing through the economy. The last chart shows the share of taxes that the top 1 percent contributes to our economy. The tax shares of the top 1 percent are around 20 percent. While the top 1 percent earns about 40 percent of the nation’s wealth, they’re only contributing 20 percent of what they’re earning back into the economy. This information is relevant because the share of taxes for the top 1 percent is not proportional considering the amount they’re earning.
In order to live equal, we have to revise the tax policy to where it fits everyone. The amount of money they take from the middle class it affects them. They have worked hard and cannot wait until “tax time” to receive their money. The market inequality also affects our society and has to be changed.
President Barack Obama writes a very informative article on the subject of inequality within the article, “A Fundamental Threat to the American Dream”. President Obama’s goal is to inform the audience about the inequality between those who are born into rich families compared to the middle and under class families. He starts by comparing statistics of economic growth between the rich and the poor in 1979, the year he graduated high school, to the current year the article was written. Between these two dates, economic growth has been tipped to benefit the rich. With newer technology, it has caused the the size of the labor force to decrease and the wealth gap to increase.
“The policies of the Reagan and first Bush administrations, which openly favored the rich, abetted a secular trend already in motion, causing inequality to increase measurably between 1981 and 1992.” (Loewen, 215) The wealthy already had their advantage when they gained their wealth. The wealth they had helped greatly in the process
In the event that the 1 percent had less, a greater amount of the 99 percent of Americans would not be getting kicked out of their homes or needing to battle to pay rent on account of the absence of cash. In light of the crevice between the wealthiest and the rest, individuals are stressed over the out of line economy dispossessing their future. As stated in the article " We are the 99 percent" they mention how the middle and poor class are getting noting while the 1 percent is getting everything. How unfair is
Nowadays, there is a huge gap of income and wealth inequality in the U.S. and that means the richer people are super rich while bottom people are struggling for basic living standard. There are some direct and explicit statistics from Inequality for All graphic package from which we can tell the phenomenon. In 2010, the typical 1% people earn 33 times of typical male workers but in 1978 the ratio is tenth comparing the male workers with the “1%” people. Also, it says “Today, the top 400 richest people have more wealth than the bottom 150 million Americans put together” (Inequality for All). This shows considerable wealth of the U.S. is controlled in the minority people, which is totally unlike the period of 1950s through 1980s.
One of the arguments used is that we could regulate and tax the 1% income because that would be “fair” but these numbers show how harmful that way of thinking is. 18% of taxes for the “bottom” of the bracket which is around 20% of the U.S population.
The most important policy from the government that increases economic inequality is taxation as well as the failure to raise the minimum wage. The importance of taxation is their impact on high earners. In a progressive tax system the taxes would be high for richer people and lower for poor people, leading to the idea that everyone would basically be paying their fair share for the amount of money that they are earning. However, in the United States recent tax reforms, as seen in the book, have allowed the rich to create loopholes and get out of paying their fair share of taxes if any taxes at all! Taxes have fallen dramatically over the years from 90% to 39% today.
They mean that the wealth gaps in America are getting further apart. The rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer. The wealth gaps in the social classes in the United States are getting worse because the haves and have nots are widening, the American dream is getting harder to do, the rich are taking more of the pie and, income inequality is on a record high. In the United States, people are categorized into three main social classes.
Wealth and Inequality in America Inequality The inequality in America has increased over time; the gap between the rich and the poor has become a problem that many Americans don’t see. Inequality is the extent of income which is distributed unequally among the citizenry. The inequality of the United has a large gap between the poor and the rich making it unfair to the population, the rich are becoming wealthier and the poor remain poor. The article “Of the 1%, By the 1%, For the 1%”, authored by Joseph E. Stiglitz describes that there is a 1 percent amount of American’s who are consuming about a quarter of the United States income in a year.
According to the Washington Post, “Ever since Trump’s election, discussion of the vast divides in our nation between prosperous regions and those battered by economic change have filled our newspapers, websites and airwaves” (Washington Post). These big tax cuts that are coming may benefit some however over all may make this gap between regions larger. Tax cuts are a reduction in taxes by decreasing the income of the government and increasing the income of those whose taxes have been lowered. Trumps tax cut plan seems great because it will increase the amount of money in a worker’s pocket by keeping it from going to the government. However, not only will the cuts just benefit the top one percent and middle-class workers it will increase government debt even more.
The rich are the ones who benefit the most from the government. Those big corporations and industries make billions of dollars from the public, and guess who owns them, rich people. So how do we solve our problem? You can’t make the poor pay more taxes, they don’t have the money. We also can’t really flatten the tax rate fairly because the only way to reduce the riches tax pay is to soak the middle class.
Rich fry says, “ A new Pew research center analysis of wealth finds the gap between Americas upper-income and middle income families has reached its highest level on record.” He also mentions “In 2013, the median wealth of the nations upper-income families ($639,400) is as nearly as seven times the median wealth of middle income families ($96,500), the wildest gap seen in 30 years. This wealth gap shows the inequality in our economy. From what I am aware of, one of the 2016 democratic presidential candidate Bernie sanders was very passionate about the inequality between classes. He wanted to tax the rich people.
Our founders, they sacrificed their lives, their liberty, their sacred honor for a democracy: a government of the many, not a government of the money” (L.Hurley-2014). Even prior to these rulings, the “trickle down” economic theory made famous by President Ronald Reagan’s tax cuts for the rich in the 1980s was just another example of the wealth’s exploitation of democracy. The theory that if the investors and job creators are prosperous, then the profits would trickle down to the rest of the population was a perfectly executed manipulation of policy to increase inequality. Saez and Piketty note, that as result of President Reagan and Prime minister Thatcher’s tax cuts in the 1980s, the U.S and U.K saw the top income tax rates slashed from 70% to less than 30% (E.Saez and