On November 11, 1918 at 11am Germany signed an armistice with the Allied forces effectively ending the bloodiest war in human history. What followed would be the rise and fall of the Weimar Republic which would ultimately establish the Third German Reich. This is the backdrop for Eric Weitz’s Weimar Germany: Promise and Tragedy, where he describes the achievements and the devastating failures which spurred on the rise and fall of a republic and the eventual creation of a dictator. The first chapter of Weitz’s book titled “A Troubled Beginning” describes the social and political landscapes of Germany following the war. All of which coalesces into the primary theme of the chapter, that the Weimer Republic was built on a foundation that was doomed …show more content…
Weitz believes it began with the sailor mutiny in the city of Kiel, which he describes as the major social shifting point as well as the final nail in the coffin for the German Empire. The sailor’s mutiny eventually expanded into a full revolution with soldiers, artisans, agricultural hands, and workers joining in. These groups form “councils” which began demanding better working conditions, higher pay, shorter work days, and the abdication of the Kaiser. Weitz explains that this push for social change quickly evolved into political activism and resulted in the death of the German Empire and the birth of the Weimar …show more content…
As stated before the social pressures as the hands of women, sailors, soldiers, and works eventually became cries for political change. Weitz explains how the rise of these groups created a rift in Germany, “To their mainly working-class supporters, the councils…were vehicles for bringing, at long last, democracy and socialism to Germany. To their opponents, including Social Democrats, the councils…meant political terror, insecurity, chaos, and economic disaster.” Due to social and political pressures the old government could not sustain power and the chancellor handed power over to the Social Democrats and their leader Friedrich Ebert. The author explains that Ebert needed to “rein in” the German people as he feared a Bolshevik type revolution. Ebert believed that establishing a constitution and a free-election would calm the chaos and control the more radical groups. For Weitz, the Social Democrats, having never held power before, to organize a successful government needed the assistance of the radical majorities in government. This resulted in compromise between the Social Democrats, army officers, high-level bureaucrats, and capitalists. Weitz describes this compromise as the start of the Weimar Republic, but also what doomed it. He states, “In grips of panic. They ran toward one another and embraced…Once the sense of panic had passed, once officers, civilians
According to Wilson’s war message to Congress, the imperial government of Germany posed a threat for world peace and democracy because they infiltrated nations - something a self-governed state would not do - threatened merchants with submarine warfare, and maintained an autocracy by keeping much of the German citizens ignorant of the government’s actions. Wilson confirmed that Germany had infiltrated many surrounding territories and US offices by sending spies into the area, disregarding the neutral status of said territories. Many spies were sent with the goal of -- which would lead to inner turmoil in the invaded countries. By expanding their forces with orders to disrupt - a prime example: the Zimmerman telegram to Mexico intercepted by the US - Germany would endanger the peace of countries and possibly be the cause of wars amongst them.
(lecture 2) Each side was trying to build their own government in order to rebuild. East and West Germany were trying to do the same thing with their side but in different
Some socialists eventually banded together to form political parties in order to secure more freedom for the working class. In the Gotha Program, presented in 1875, the Social Democratic Workers ' Party of Germany laid out their plan to demand reforms from the government in order to give workers more rights and freedom (Document 3). The socialist movement was caused by the great changes brought on by industrialization during the mid to late 1800s, and worked to create a socialistic organization of society. Many of these groups wanted to secure more rights and profits to the working class compared to the minimum rights and freedom they had with a pure capitalistic economy. Socialists groups like the Social Democratic Workers ' Party of
Berman argues that the central problem of Germany that accommodated the actions of the Nazi Party involved the weak political institutions of the state such as political parties (402). Without strong political parties to respond to the demands of German citizens as whole, the German society in both the Wilhelmine and Weimar eras lacked trust and common interests. Berman argues that associationism can only benefit democratic societies when the state has adequate political institutions that are able to channel the demands of the various groups (427). Therefore, although Berman is not necessarily against civil society, she argues that strong and legitimate political institutions must serve as preconditions in order for democracy to
The young Weimar Republic was wracked by armed street fighting waged mainly between Communists and Nazis. Foreclosures, bankruptcies, suicides and malnourished all skyrocketed. Six million Germans, 40 per cent of the working population, were unemployed; and thousands found themselves without a place to live….” (2) The Bruning government failed to respond to the German population
The seeds of German Nationalism were sown throughout the world war I battles. Once the war was over, and Germany was separated from Prussia as punishment for the war, nationalism began to take root and grow. Therefore, I have changed my proposal to reflect the following. German nationalism, which was sown during world war I and continued to grow following the war resulted in consequences which effected its military, economic structure, and political decision making.
The cost of strengthening the military demanded heavy funding that could be for the domestic needs of Germany. The media cynically used propaganda to demonize its political opponents and elevate the military as Germany's guardians while swaying the public into supporting militarism as necessary for the country's well-being. Nationalist sentiment spread throughout Germany via newspapers and radio communication, uniting its people under the pretense of xenophobia and hatred against those threatening Germany's prosperity. Several political parties arose during this period that shifted from the Conservative party's beliefs to a more democratic and liberal view. Some of the parties that came about during this time were the Social Democratic party, Liberal party, and Liberal Democratic party; each of the parties had its own set of ideals that segregated them from the other parties, but all had the same
The last supports the arguments of Robert S. Wistrich. From one side there was frustrated and vulnerable middle class indignant about inequality associated with capitalism. As I’ve mentioned before, Germany was very fragmented and peasants in some parts favoured from industrialization. But outbreaks of hostility frequently connected with concrete events or laws. For example, from 1890th onwards the government raised taxes in an attempt to increase budget for further industrialization and military expenses.
• There is historical debate over Ebert’s sincerity and leadership of the SPD; whilst most historians, such as Paul Bookbinder would agree that although the integrity of Ebert and the SPD remain definite, their readings of the political situations in the early years of the republic were blinded by their fear of insurgency from left and right-wing forces. • They too citizen Ebert of having supported the forces of their opposition, causing them to compromise with the traditional forces of Imperial Germany rather than proclaiming their own authority. • The army was not reformed and it was never committed to a democratic state. • As a corollary, they failed to capitalize on the opportunity to establish a stable republic founded on socialists and democratic philosophies, hindering the legitimacy of the republic from the onset.
As illustrated in Document L, Germany depicted Jews as the root of their problems. The multiple failures of democratic governments angered citizens into a revolt for new change in political aspects of the country. In essence, it allowed them to put the blame on others in an attempt to resolve the internal issues within Germany. Correspoinsidly in Document G, the rise of fascism directly influenced political parties in the German democracy as the number of Nazi members of the Reichstag began from twelve in 1928 and rose to 230 by 1933. Similarly, Russia needed a new way of life and leadership following the Russian Revolution in 1917.
“One day in 1942, copies of a leaflet entitled the White Rose suddenly appeared at the University of Munich. The leaflet contained an anonymous essay that said that the Nazi system had slowly imprisoned the German people and was now destroying them. The Nazi regime had turned evil. It was time, the essay said, for Germans to rise up and resist the tyranny of their own government. At the bottom of the essay, the following request appeared: Please make as many copies of this leaflet as you can and distribute them.
This paragraph is going to talk about the Germans’ reaction to the Treaty of Versailles. Germans had a negative impact about the Treaty of Versailles. In a German newspaper called Deutsche Zeitung, published on 28 June 1919, it stated that “The disgraceful Treaty is being signed today. Don’t forget it! We will never stop until we win back what we deserve.”
The Third Reich, referring to Hitler’s reign and Germany being under Nazi rule between the years 1933-1945, is often referred to as a totalitarian state. A totalitarian state is a system of government in which all power is centralized and does not allow any rival authorities, and the state controls every corner of individual lives with absolute power. Nazi Germany has been referred to as an excellent example of this type of government. This essay will analyse five aspects of Nazi Germany to determine whether it truly exhibited the totalitarian style of government.
The weaknesses faced by the Weimar Republic was known which also enabled Hitler to exploit the weaknesses of the left and the moderates. Appearing to be the strong leader and withholding the communication skills needed to lead a country, he was able to gain the votes he needed (Orlow 'Modern Germany ' p.185). There were violent strikes in the streets, back and forth fighting, rioting. People were killed and the people of Germany, who feared Communism and despise chaos, sided with the “volkishe” parties, who promised to establish law and order. The people of Germany thought rather than having thousands die it would be better to have law and order and break a few heads than to live with that chaos.
However, without the socio-economic problems that Germany encountered and the weakness of their political situation, Hitler would not have had the opportunity to come into power and destory democracy in 1933. In 1918, a republic was announced with the socialist Frederich Ebert as chancellor. Ebert wanted to sign the armistice