The Westminster Parliamentary Model system emerged to the majority of the African Colonies in the tumultuous times of the 1960s and 1970s when African countries got the independence they have been fighting for. Just like hereditary genes in the DNA code, this Model was meant to be passed down from generation to generation. However the African colonies defied the pattern, today the Westminster Parliamentary Model of government is history as most African countries have switched to the Presidential system of government. There is an incredible distinction and meaning with regards to the type of regime whether parliamentary or presidential which a country has employed. It is of paramount importance for the parliamentary and presidential systems …show more content…
Separation of powers refers to its fundamental value partaing to its constitutional principle of checks and balances in government “to ensure that state authority is constitutionally controlled and not used arbitrary” (Labuschagne, 2004: 85). This means that to ensure that that the constitutional right to to freedom is not infringed there has to be division of the centralised constitutional power, as no organ of the state would have all the power and end up abusing it. Rautenback and Malherbel , 1996:68 teaches that even in the separation their functions and powers are exercised different government personnel and bodies. This is of paramount importance in maintainaning order in the government (Labuschagne,2004:86). Separation of powers also refered to a s trias politica as a dicta divides government powers between the legislature, executive and …show more content…
In simplicity this means that this is a system in which votes are converted into seats in parliament or any other organ of the state. There are different types of electorate systems used around the world in different levels and regions of government including University council elections. There are three different types of electorate systems, first being the plurality electorate system or winner-take-all system: - here seats are awarded to individuals who attain the most votes (Charlse, 2000:3). Second being the Majority electoral system also called the second ballot system: - it is the opposite of the plurality system as it requires candidates to attain a majority of vote determined by a 50%-plus-one-vote, in order to win. Thirdly being proportional representation which is currently adopted by the South African government. With this system the percentage seats warded to candidates is dependent and directly proportional to the percentage of the votes
One of the ways that the United States guarded against cruel and oppressive government or rule was that they made the three branches of government. These three branches were the Executive Branch, the Legislative Branch, and the Judicial Branch. This helped guard against cruel and oppressive government or rule because “they were separate and distinct powers.” (Doc B) This would help to guard against cruel and oppressive government or rule because all of these powers were separated so there wasn’t one overpowering government.
Does the Constitution Guard Against Tyranny? “Tyranny and anarchy are never far apart’. Tyranny is a cruel, aggressive government or rule there are many sorts of tyranny. Separation of Powers are branches that do not have power over each other when they are separated it creates an equal government. Small states and large states help with votes in each senate this is determined by the population of the state.
The separation of powers is a way for the branches to not have to much power. For example, according to James Madison, Federalist #47, “Liberty requires that the three great departments of power should be separate and distant.” This means that the branches should not all have the same powers and should be very different from each other and not have to much power over one another. Separation of powers helps guard against tyranny by not allowing the branches to be too close to each other or this could very lead to tyranny. The branches should be close enough to check up on each other and have everything fair but not to close to where we could have tyranny in our government and
Separation of power is exactly what connotes, power is divided among different offices. In Document B James Madison states, “liberty requires that the three great departments of power should be separate and distinct” (Doc B). He wanted each branch of government to be different because if they did the same thing tyranny would develop. The first three articles in the constitution broadly explains what each branch’s responsibility is. The legislative branch makes laws, the executive branch enforces laws, and the judicial branch interprets laws.
tyranny Imagine being in a country where tyranny is the order of the day, your king has all the power of the government and is abusing it to harm the people. Now luckily we live in America where we are protected by the Constitution against tyranny. When the Constitutional Convention came together in 1787 to draft the constitution of the United States because the Articles of Confederation gave too much power to the states. Whilst writing the Constitution the delegates had to figure out a way to create a strong national government without creating a tyranny. But how exactly did the Constitution guard against tyranny?
Separation of Powers is the division of powers into three branches. In Document B it explains that the legislative branch makes laws, the executive branch enforces laws, and the judicial branch passes them. This evidence explains how the Constitution guards against tyranny because it separates the powers of the government and it makes sure that no branch has more power than the other.
America has broken free from British power and needs to get control of their own nation. They meet in Philadelphia for a constitutional convention in May of 1787. How did the rule book protect against having too much power? When one person has too much power. The constitution guarded against tyranny in several ways which are federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances and big vs small states.
In 1787, years after the founding of the United States, the Constitutional Convention met to decide how the new nation would govern itself. The delegates understood that the need for a leader was necessary but still bitterly remembered how Britain abused of its power. The delegates agreed that the President and Vice President should be chosen informally and not based on the direct popular vote, thus gave birth to the Electoral College. The Electoral College is defined as “a body of people representing the states of the US, who formally cast votes for the election of the president and vice president.” Since 1787 the Electoral College has been the system for voting in the United States, but with our nation ever more changing and growing it
They don’t need to stumble between elections due to unstable decisions by minority governments. This method is known to be simple, clear and decisive in majority of the cases. It also gives people a chance to vote a person rather than a political party. Therefore, the voters can evaluate the performance of the individual rather than just have to accept a list of candidates given by a party. 3.
Therefore, power has been justly distributed between each division of government. Checks and balances are yet another form of separation of powers in the government. As the Constitution was initially written, there were checks and balances preventing any one branch of becoming too powerful. Since we still follow the same Constitution (with a few amendments) those checks and balances are still used.
Separation of Powers is an act of vesting the legislative, executive, and judicial powers of government in separate bodies. Quote: “Liberty requires that the three great departments of power should be separate and distinct.” In order for separation of powers to work the Congress has to vest the legislative, executive, and judicial powers into separate bodies with the government. The Constitution guarded against tyranny by establishing branches and checks.
In Thomas Paine’s “Common Sense”, he said it’s absurd for an island to rule over a continent. This is especially true when Great Britain imposed tyrannic and restrictive laws on the colonies, so the founding fathers of the new independent country created the new constitution in a way the would prevent tyranny in the newly independent United States. The Articles of Confederation was the first plan of government for the newly formed U.S. The Articles were to weak to support a nation properly, so the new constitution began to form. How does the Constitution , a plan of government, guard against the government abusing its power.
Federalism guards against tyranny, so does the separation of powers, checks and balances, and the House of Representatives and the Senate. Each guard in different, unique ways. All of them do the same job to guard against tyranny. Federalism divides the government into the state and central governments. The division of powers gives each branch of government equal power, while checks and balances allows each branch to check each other.
In practice, the German elector generally has two votes, represented by two columns on the ballot. The first vote is used for the majority one-round election of the representative of the constituency (the one who comes first in the first round is elected). There are 299 constituencies in Germany, so direct votes make up roughly half of the seats in the Bundestag. The second vote - Zweitstimme (second vote) or Landesstimme (vote of the Land) - allocates, according to a proportional distribution, the seats of the body to be elected to the different political parties. In Germany, there is no direct election of a person except at the communal level.
Separation of powers refers to the idea that the major body of a state should be functioned independently and that no individual of a state should have power separately. Therefore, separation of powers means that splitting up of responsibilities into different divisions to limit any one branch from expurgating the functions of another. The intention of the doctrine is to prevent the application of powers and provide for checks and balances of governing a state. It is a doctrine of constitutional law under which the three branches of government, executive power, legislative power, and judicial power are been kept separately to prevent abuse of power.