Racism remains a dilemma. We do not need to look any further than the leader of the free world for proof. Trump made an example of prominent black athletes when he called for the firing of NFL players who do not stand for the National Anthem; called Colin Kaepernick a “son of a bitch,” and rescinded the Golden State Warriors visit to the White House after Stephen Curry was reluctant to meet the President. Trump has similarly targeted Muslims with an irrational travel ban, pledged to build a wall on the Mexican border and he continues to taunt North Korea. Sadly, these examples are just a few.
Officer Jason Stockley’s actions remind us that we continue to live in a world of white privilege where hate crimes exist and juries acquit. From eyewitness reports, Stockley declared he would kill Anthony Smith and he did that by firing five rounds into Smith’s vehicle. Despite intent to kill, Stockley was acquitted.
…show more content…
Without the presence of these programs, race and ethnicity will continue to be used as a basis for arrests. This will result in a disadvantage in the law enforcement system for some racial groups. Systemic disadvantage for racial groups is the definition of racism.
The Charlottesville readings remind us that neo-Nazi groups still exist in America, and the members do not even bother to hide their faces. That is solid proof that racism still exists. Trump failed to condemn the neo-Nazis for their actions. When Trump failed to stand up to this racism, he sent a powerful message of acceptance to the
Vox’s news article clams that its happened again that a white police officer of unnecessary shooting killed a black man and was founded not guilty by court. Protests has erupted in St. Louise because of this verdict. Jason Stockley shot and killed Anthony Lamar Smith after an alleged drug deal, he claimed he was afraid Smith was reaching into his car to crab a gun. Although, prosecutors argued that Stockley had planted the gun to justify the killing. Prosecutors claimed they heard Stockley saying he was going to kill Smith on the police dashboard camera video but, Stockley’s defense insisted that he never said this and it is hard to make out in the video.
Any indication that a police officer has engaged in violent conduct against a person based on assumptions about the group to which that person belongs, the neighborhood in which he or she is encountered, his or her style of dress, or his or her pattern of speech is a violation of the Bill of Rights and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.(18 Delores Jones-Brown). Oscar Grant's Bill of Rights were meaningless when a racist officer shot him. The police officer that shot Grant has been guilty when he shot a round out of the gun. the jury convicted former Bay Area Rapid Transit police officer Johannes Mehserle of the least serious of three homicide charges--involuntary manslaughter--because none of the jurors was black.
The worst punishments these officers receive vary from a demotion to discharge from the force. Zimmerman, a community watch member who shot and killed Trayvon Martin, was never treated as a criminal and although he was charged with murder he was eventually acquitted of all charges. Zimmerman was more recently accused of drunkenly boasting about his crime to strangers in a bar while using racial slurs when referring to Martin. Zimmerman’s privilege as a member of the justice system lead to an unfair sentence that caused Martin’s death to go unavenged. Another more complicated example of police privilege is police assisted suicide.
Racial profiling is ineffective because most descriptions of suspects are too vague and when police set up a description of what a criminal looks like, if they were to base it on the race of the criminal the amount of people who would fit that description is immense. The Boston Marathon Bombing is an example of this. When the police were on the lookout for possible suspects, they were looking for any brown men who were wearing backpacks. Elahe Izadi wrote an article titled "Racial Profiling Is Ineffective in Catching Terrorists" in which she discusses the flaws of racial profiling. Izadi points out, "Even if the public had known whether the suspects were white or "dark-skinned," that piece of information was still too vague to be useful—how
Written Task 2 Racial profiling as defined by the National Institute of Justice is “a practice that targets people for suspicion of crime based on their race, ethnicity, religion or national origin” (National Institute of Justice). There are two different kinds of racial profiling according to the primary text. There is what can be called "Hard" profiling, that sees race as the only factor in assessing criminal suspiciousness.
License of registration please. Hearing this statement I think of a person getting pulled over by a police. But not just any person. A black person to be exact. Now the question is, why did that black person get pulled over?
From the shooting demise of unarmed young person Michael Brown, to the vigorously mobilized police reaction, to the challenges in the wake of Brown 's passing, to the disappointment of the fabulous jury to prosecute Officer Darren Wilson for his part in the shooting, the occasions in Ferguson, Missouri, have turned up the warmth on a long stewing open deliberation over the tenacious imbalances in our criminal equity framework. Other late occasions have made the critical need to act significantly all the more clear: In Staten Island, New York, an excellent jury chose not to arraign New York Police Officer Daniel Pantaleo for creating the demise of another unarmed dark man, Eric Garner, despite the fact that the officer 's activities were
300359810 Mrs. Fahey ERWC 12-Period 2 14 September 2015 Racial Profiling Racial discrimination is becoming a major problem in today 's society. Our nation is facing problems based on the discrimination on race, ethnicity, religion or national origin. Racial profiling is a clear violation of the civil rights of the United States.
Racial profiling has been going on for hundreds of years now by everyday citizens and law enforcement. “Racial profiling happens everyday,in cities and towns across the country”(ACLU).When will this humiliating profiling stop?Often people have walks and boycotts just to show how serious they want their equal living. “Racial profiling is a longstanding and deeply troubling national problem despite claims that the United States has entered a “post-racial era”(ACLU). Racial profiling is when law enforcement target individuals based off their race ,ethnic or religion as harm to the society.
I see a few different reasons why racial profiling still exists. Not that I think that it is right but I come from a town where there are literally a handful of African Americans at a time. And for a long time they would only stay a few weeks before they were harassed out of town. Law enforcement would keep an eye on them and if they seemed to be causing trouble, it never failed that they would pack up and head out before a few weeks had gone by.
Does having officers who check documents based on the color of your skin really work in reducing the number of illegal immigrants we have in the U.S? Would farmers and productions companies land on hard times without the extra help the immigrants provide? .Things have been going downhill for a while now. With all the problems that are caused by basing whether or not you should be pulled over while following all traffic laws, stopped on the sidewalk on your way home from getting a bite to eat, or taking longer at border stops just trying to take your family to disneyland, all because of the color of your skin. This controversial law was passed by Arizona Governor Jan Brewer, who signed the law in 2010(Serrano, Sept. 07, 2012).
Racial profiling is not justified , many cops should not have to shoot , run after , or even arrest someone due to race. This resolves to the term "Racism" and many people are still racist which lead cops and even citizens to act upon someone a different race than they are. The cost and benefits of racial profiling in not really beneficial but the cost is many innocent lives taken away from a trigger and a man with a badge. So whats there to do ? How can we stop this ?
Racial profiling has become a national issue starting in 2015 (“Racial”). Judging someone for their race has been a problem ever since a minority group has been noticed. Racial profiling has spread over all over the world. Racial profiling has been a problem through the years, if the human race can learn what racial profiling is, advantages of the profiling, and the disadvantages.
(Burke). The fact that this man died because of what he looked like is repulsive. This isn’t the first time incidents like this happened. In fact, there has been many cases just like this one, and in the end the person of color always dies while the officer remains free with no charge. Another study shows “So far in 2015, U.S. police killed 776 people, 161 of whom were completely unarmed at the time of their death.”
I think it is not okay to racially profile, but I also think it is okay in some cases because you are accusing someone for doing something by their appearance. Also There is no guarantee that the police will catch the criminal by racial profiling. There are lot of criminals that the police needs to catch and with racial profiling the police could kind a get the idea of who or what kind a person might commit a crime. It will help the police catch the criminal faster. Racial profiling can help the police in some ways and in some other ways it can not help the police and could just make it worser.