What Are The Mongols Barbaric

Like many great and powerful leaders Julius Caesar was quite arrogant. This generally frowned upon quality

In contrast, to typical beliefs as what a barbarian fighting force contains, the Mongols had an efficiently trained, througholloy organized military, skilled in military tactics. The Mongols were well trained from birth, according to one source, “Mongol soldiers were superb horsemen, having spent all their lives in the saddle,” (W.H. p.332). Additionally, the stirrup, a powerful new invention, increased the natural power of the Mongols by enabling them to better defend and attack their enemies, according to one source, “Stirrups enabled a mounted warrior

Effective Leader Imagine having a whole lot of power, being able to influence people, and being able to make decisions, what would you do? That is what Emperor Qin, Alexander the great and Augustus/Octavian had to do. I think that Alexander the great is the most effective leader.

Alexander was one of the greatest leaders of all time. His history prevails to this day, and his military tactics are still studied in modern military academies. Upon his death, Alexander conquered most of the world known to the Greeks. His great ambitions lead him to believe that everything was possible.

a punishment like me upon you” . All which to portray the fact that Genghis Khan was the most influential political and military leader, perhaps Genghis Khan was the most influencial ruler of the ancient world. To prove that Genghis khan was the most influential political leader and war general for his time period we must start from the beginning of his life and thoroughly examine issues such as; how his life as a child affected his place in Mongol society, more specifically, how being the son of a great chief in the Borjijin clan helped allow him to receive unique opportunities’ that most people in his clan could not evemmmmr hope to achieve, we must also look at his personal military achievements and how such achievements gave him the immense

These are just a few of the many distinctions between these two warring nations. The first and most important advantage the north had was their heavy population. In total, the north outnumbered the south by more than 5 to 2. The north also had about 70% of all railroads in America under their control, and this allowed them to productively move soldiers and supplies rapidly around the nation. Instead of marching troops to the front line in months, generals could quickly deploy troops within days or weeks.

Alexander the Great was known as one of the greatest leaders in all the Ancient Western World but, there is a darker side to his legacy. Alexander the Great should not be notorious for being a great leader who spread greek culture throughout the ancient world but as the man who had an unbeatable military, killed innocent people and had a military strategy that was to destroy and obliterate. Alexander the Great had full control of anything he touched. He was one of the wealthiest people to ever live and abused his powers of being leader of at the time, one of the most powerful nations in the world. Overall, Alexander the great should not be held to the name Alexander the Great because it wasn’t his battle tactics and knowledge that lead him to never lose a battle but it was the sheer quantity and skill of his military that made them great.

Compare and contrast the leadership and impact of Genghis Khan and Alexander the Great. Both Khan and Alexander are great leaders. They both conquered large territories and were able to guide both the leaders and the armies underneath their command. Alexander consolidated the Greeks into one empire (although being a Macedonian he was not really seen as Greek), This stopped all intestine wars among the Hellenic cities and somehow put order in the empire, transform Greece into a tremendous war machine that allowed him to conquer their eternal enemies the Persians and most of countries under their domain, reach as far as India before his death. As he was absorbed by Persian customs, and vices, most historians say he forgot his homeland, so

During the half millennium from about 1000 to 1500 c.e, Mongol people of Eurasia played a larger role than ever before, establishing the largest land empire in history. The mongol empire had a large influence in shaping the continent of Eurasia both politically and economically. Beginning at the conquest of Genghis Khan, The Mongol Empire stretched throughout Europe, Asia and the Middle East. The economic effects of Mongol rule were similar and benefitted both China and the Middle East with the support of trade throughout both empires. However,politically mongol rule within china and the middle east differed greatly.

These men are recognized as the famous Navajo Code Talkers, who exemplify the unequaled bravery and patriotism of the Navajo people. If it was not for the Navajo Code Talker's, the Marines would have never taken Iwo Jima. The discovery of oil on Navajo land in the early 1920's promoted the need for a more systematic form of government, when the Navajo Nation became known as a wealthy nation. Navajo government

Barbarossa, the Holy Roman Emperor raised 100,000 knights and infantry by himself, Philip II gathered 2,000 troops and from Richard I 6,000 .The fact that these monarchs individually raised such extensive numbers supports Tyerman’s observation that it was indeed the “leadership of monarchs” that strengthened the crusading forces. However, there were monarchs in the previous Crusades who succeeded in creating vast forces, this illustrates that this could be down to the evolution of crusading that encouraged more people to take up the cross, rather than fall of Jerusalem being a ‘turning point’. Furthermore, leadership continued to develop after the fall of Jerusalem signifying that Jerusalem itself was not a key turning point to the nature of crusading. This can be shown with the Fourth Crusade which had appointed a leader before they got to the Holy Land, this is different when comparing Raymond and Bohemund who arrived at the Levant who then assumed control, this is further illustrated with Richard in the Third Crusade.

The most savage conquerors of history were the Mongols. The Mongolian empire was the largest land empire of its era and occupied land from the yellow sea in Eastern Asia to the border of Eastern Europe. The empire included land in China, Korea, Mongolia, Persia as well as parts of Thailand and Russia. The Mongols derived from loosely organized nomadic tribes around Mongolia, Siberia and Manchuria. They lived off their land and the resources provided, and became great warriors.

The Mongols conquered much land to create a vast empire with a legacy that impacts society today. With their armies, the Mongols brought a new type of government to China. They allowed China to continue its bureaucratic ways, but had absolute control over everything. Although there are other cultures that have influenced China’s government, the Mongols had a great impact on China’s government. This is shown by the similar traits both governments of the time share, its military dependency, intimidation, and absolute power without any checks.

The Mongols period (1206-1368) was a horrific time but also somewhat peaceful. The Mongols invaded the largest land empire in “human history”. The Empire fell most times after two hundred after being built. The Mongols changed history greatly. They had many positive and negative on the empire.

Strength, ruthless, fearless, these words can describe the Mongol Empire. They put a mark on history which shaped the whole basis of interaction between civilizations. One expedition is the Sack of Baghdad. The Mongol sack of Baghdad of 1258 is a turning point in world history because it destroyed the Islamic Golden Age by destroying their society, killing their citizens and their knowledge.