POLICY POINT PAPER FOR PRIME MINISTER TRUDEAU
ISSUE: Under the previous Harper government, the Canadian government brokered a $15-billion deal to sell weaponized armoured vehicles manufactured in Ontario to Saudi Arabia. Does this deal align with Canada’s “principled” foreign policy, and how should the new Trudeau government proceed with the deal without hurting Saudi Arabian relations and its own reputation in human rights?
BACKGROUND:
Saudi Arabia is Canada’s second largest export market in the Middle East. Exports in 2014 were valued at $1.2 billion mainly in vehicles, equipment and mechanical/ electrical production. Canada imports more than twice that amount- the majority in mineral production. There is very little integral academic or cultural exchange between the countries.
The $15-billion deal is the largest military export contract in Canadian history. It will provide almost 3,000 Canadian workers with employment for 15
…show more content…
Criticizing Saudi Arabia and halting the deal will force Saudi Arabia to address many of the severe human rights violations that will curb future trade deals.
Cons: Revisiting a deal made by the previous Conservative government will be seen as an attack on efforts made by the Harper government. Voters have witnessed the current government abandon many campaign promises, and not follow through on many bills and deals deemed “crucial” and “priority” by the Harper government, cancelling the deal would further this negative image.
Canada should revisit the details of the deal and address the potential human rights violation and pressure Saudi Arabia with possible sanctions if the vehicles supplied are caught being used against its
The Oka affair turned many heads in Canada, and the world. There were two sides, the Oka, and the Canadian government. Both sides thought they were in the right, but who was. This essay will talk about the rights and wrongs of each side. I have researched this topic from many point’s of view.
In the articles “Romanticism and realism in Canada’s foreign policy” by Allan Gotlieb, and “Canada’s global promise” by Jennifer Welsh, both authors argue the need for Canada to re-evaluate their current foreign policy however, differ in the way of how Canada should strive for international growth. Firstly, both authors contend that due to Canada’s lack of involvement of being the “peacekeeper” that they use to be, Canada’s reputation of being the global player has taken a serious hit. In Welsh’s article she mentions many Canadians want to be more active on the world stage, and want to spend more money on over seas development, and such UN projects, however the problem “is that Canadians are rarely asked to make difficult trade-offs in spending”. As a result, the Canadian government has to make cuts in spending on such military resources, and programs, in
Looking at Canada's benefits and detriments from World War II will help view the perspectives of multiple countries. As well as analyzing this will help us pick an overall decision
Canada at war, 3 Sept. 2007. Web. Nov 30. 2014
The Dynamic Evolution of the Canadian Military over the decades The Canadian military has undergone a remarkable journey of development throughout its history, adapting to the changing needs and challenges of the nation. This essay explores the evolution of the Canadian military from the pre-World War I era to the present day, examining the changes and continuity in its role. We can comprehend how the Canadian military has developed while remaining committed to protecting Canadian interests by analysing the impact of shifting global dynamics, technological breakthroughs, and developing national security goals. Prior to World War I, Canada's military activity was essentially related to its status as a British colony, and its principal focus was on protecting British interests.
Diefenbaker’s decision to sign the NORAD closely linked Canada’s defense to the U.S’s and this intimate connection is still present today. In this sense, the Avro Arrow project was worth the money, because it would have made Canada more independent and would not have forced it to rely on a country that wants to control it. The previous governor of the Bank of Canada, Coyne, actually criticized Diefenbaker’s government for its huge reliance on capital exports and loans from the U.S.. Diefenbaker was also putting Canada in grave danger by worsening its relations with other countries.
This essay will talk about the negative and positive effects of the treaty on Canada. Canada's military underwent massive changes not only after but before the treaty as well. One of the most notable changes was the Canadian military’s shift towards an independent military stance. Evidence of this can be seen in world war I with Canada's contributions to the war effort during the war. Both the battle of the Somme and Vimy ridge were great examples of this.
Canada has been one of the twelve original members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) since it was founded in 1949, a few years after the end of World War 2 and at the beginning of an almost nuclear disaster known as the Cold War. This intergovernmental military alliance initially made up of the United States, Canada and Western European nations (Belgium, Denmark, France, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, and the United Kingdom) plays a significant role to secure international peace and has become the heart of Canadian security and defence policy. Canada is very proud to have contributed to every NATO operation since the founding of this organization more than sixty years ago, proving the commitment
This has earned it the reputation of having an open arms. The recent attacks including the 9/11 attacks has led to numerous questions been asked regarding Canada’s policies. Canada has always been one of the rare countries where culture and society have been shaped by immigration. Canada has a vast tract of land without inhabitants hence it has been attributed that this is among the reasons for their lenient policies. Canada’s population has been relatively low over the years hence this led to the desire to expand both population wise and economically.
“ Their policies [ the Conservative party’s] appeared confused and impractical. “ (Fellows and Wells, 2013). This is perhaps most appearant in Diefenbaker’s ambitions to make Canada less dependent on the U.S. economically. Diefenbaker announced an ambitious plan that would allow Canada to move 15% of it’s trade from the U.S. to Britain. Ideally the plan addresses the growing discomfort that Canadian citizens had with the U.S.’s increasing role in their country.
Canadians are very grateful, for as they know that other countries don’t get the kind of luxury they have been given and that has been given to them even for doing
Even though this country has had many different roles, this country has seen a fair share of conflicts. Some of these struggles ended positive and others not so much. Canada had been involved in many conflicts, as well as an observer, and it still had an effect on our future. Some conflicts Canada was not even included in, but they wanted to create better
When the world thinks of Canada, the words that automatically come to mind are peace and unity. However, this almost changed in 1970 when the FLQ kidnapped politicians
Canada continued to have many peacekeeping/making missions, such as in the Korean War and the Suez crisis. Later the Canada view of peacekeeping was most notably damaged by the Somalian scandal where, according to the Canadian Encyclopedia “two Canadian paratroopers serving in Somalia beat and tortured a local teenager to death. A dozen more Canadian soldiers had been aware of the beating but did nothing to intervene” This scandal embarrassed Canada and hurt its reputation for peacekeeping. Canada’s history of peacekeeping has shaped it by helping build its reputation as a strong middle power, a player in the UN. Along with that it helped bolster national pride World War One, Two and peace have been defining themes in Canada’s history.
Today, Canada is seen as a multicultural and peaceful nation that has evolved over the course of history. This great nation would never have been possible without the impact that former Prime Minister, Lester B. Pearson left on this country. His achievements and insights profoundly affected and shaped Canada’s nation. First, peacekeeping is an important part of Canada’s heritage and a reflection of its fundamental beliefs that Pearson implemented after dealing with world changing situations and winning a Nobel Prize. Also, his contributions as a liberal leader as well as the flaws and controversy with Diefenbaker did in fact define this country.