I believe the testing of animals for beauty products is not ethical and should stop. The debate of testing on animals has been going on for a long time. Aristotle debated this by saying that we as humans were at the top of the pyramid because we have the sense of reasoning and rational souls. In the scenario we face is that the rabbits are given injections in the eyes and this is very painful for them. The Pro side to this debate is that humans should have the right to test on animals, especially if it saves a life. Kant ethical theory says since animals have no wills, they do not have good will so they don’t have any basic value (Thiroux ,2014) So it is ethical to do testing on the rabbits because it saves the eye sights of women using their
Unfortunately, the difference between humans and animals lies in the way their environment affects their behavior. In Vitro testing is sometimes regarded as even more accepted and effective than animal testing itself, along with being way more ethically sound. This is also way less expensive, and can save a lot of animals from death without meaning. Many of the tests that happen to animals end up inconclusive and a fair amount of animals who are tested on end up dying. Because of the cosmetic use for animals declining, new tests are being used to show tests and side effects of makeup and other products without using an animal.
Animals are being used for personal needs and used against their will so morally this seems wrong. There has been many side effects to testing that have hurt mankind so there are very good reasons to do away with animal testing. Do the pros of animal testing outweigh the cons? I believe they both cancel each other out and no matter what we do there will be a risk for reward. Seeing what animal testing has done for mankind is a major factor in this paper because it has done wonders for us in the medical field, but the cost has been equal and has hurt many.
The new standards stated that three requirements had to be satisfied: (1) “the voluntary consent of the person on whom the experiment is to be performed,” (2) “the danger of each experiment must be previously investigated by animal experimentation,” and (3) “the experiment must be performed under proper medical protection and management” (Washington, 2006, p. 221). These standards were violated when doctors injected Elmer Allen, a black man who had escaped the South and made a good life for himself and his family in Chicago, with plutonium-238 (Washington, 2006). Plutonium-238 is an even more intensely radioactive isotope than plutonium-239, which was given to most of the other patients (Washington, 2006). Allen suffered a similar experience
The history of animal testing also reveals numerous instances of cruelty towards animals. In the past, animals were used for cosmetic testing, with rabbits being blinded by eye irritants and dogs being forced to swallow large doses of chemicals. Such practices have rightly been
Cosmetic companies use the Draize eye test to evaluate irritation caused by shampoos, which involves rabbits being incapacitated in stocks with their eye lids held open by clips, sometimes for multiple days so they cannot blink away the product being tested.” Proverbs 12:10 says that “The righteous care for the needs of their animals, but the kindest acts of the wicked are cruel.” Scientist may have the best intention for humans when testing animals, but have a lack of compassion for the animal. Ecclesiastes 3:19-20 “Humans and animals have the same destiny. One dies just like the other.
The practice of animal testing is a very debatable topic. “Each year, more than 100 million animals, including mice, rats, frogs, dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, monkeys, fish, and birds are killed in U.S. laboratories” (Experiments). “The term “animal testing” refers to procedures performed on living animals for purposes of research into basic biology and diseases assessing the effectiveness of new medicinal products, and testing the human health and/or environmental safety of consumer and industry products such as cosmetics, household cleaners, food additives, pharmaceuticals and industrial/agro-chemicals” (About). There is numerous pros and cons for using animals in experiments for humans for our everyday needs. There is different pros for animal testing including helping researchers to find drugs and treatments, help ensure safety of drugs, there are no other testing alternatives, and it provides an opportunity to examine a complete life cycle.
“Animal testing violates animals' basic rights, and experiments conducted on them result in extreme and even torturous pain” (Conn). The tests are produced to determine the potential harm of a drug or cosmetic product on numerous animals like mice, rats and rabbit’s attempts to
Their Experiences Animal testing on bunnies is also a controversial issue because many people believe that it is unethical to use animals this way. “In addition to the suffering caused
“The question is not, "Can they reason?" nor, "Can they talk?" but rather, "Can they suffer?’”(Jeremy Bentham, 1832) .Whether we should use animals for testing or not. Some would say it’s beneficial for the human race while others look at it as a form of cruelty. A high number of people, according to polls, state that they would rather like to see an alternative to testing.
Animal testing exists to prevent certain medicines from being experimented on human beings; most often used in this research are rats, rabbits, cats, many forms of primates, and the list goes on as an estimated of ¨more than 115 million animals worldwide are used in laboratory experiments every year.¨ (Humane Society International). With this information not being common knowledge among much of the world, there is, like any situation, two sides to this
Animal testing is a subject that has been deemed controversial for quite a long time now, and is still argued today. Now, you'll see many companies breaking from this animal testing, and making vegan products and selling almost just as well. Just listening to the word,"Animal testing" automatically makes you think of something horrible and inhumane, but there are reasons that it isn't. California Biomedical Research Association says that almost every medical breakthrough within the last 100 years has been derived from animal testing. Animals, especially those that have extremely similar DNA to ours, have been exceptionally helpful in medical research.
Animal Testing Sometimes when we test different medicines or different products on animals, there are serious side effects. These side effects can be very harmful and painful to the animals. These tests can be very beneficial because if we test it on an animal, then we would not give it to a human if it would harm or kill the animal. We should continue with animal testing, it may put the animals in some pain but it is better than having a human die after using it.
Whether this is morally right or wrong, I will present both sides of the argument as well as my opinion. PROS OF ANIMAL TESTING Nearly every nobel Laureate in physiology or medicine since 1901 has relied on animal research. Animal testing has decreased heavily over the years, with not very necessary things like makeup. Without animal testing we wouldn't have the many of the surgerys that we can today such as hip replacement surgery, kidney transplants, heart transplants, or blood transfusions.
Issues related to animal testing are now frequently discussed. The debate about animal testing is often about if it is morally right or wrong to dominate an animal’s life to achieve human's various goals. In recent years, experiments on animals such as mice and monkey for biomedical research has been heavily critisized by various animal protection groups that such action is inhumane against animals. Animals in research facilities and cosmetics companies are suffering in pain and even death during experiments. An estimated 26 million animals are used in animal testing every year in the United States.
Animal testing goes as far back to greek philosophers such as Aristotle (384 – 322 BC) and Erasistratus (304 – 258 BC). Whom once performed testing on animals to advance behavior of something or who aspired to alter brain activity. However there was scientists such as Galen (129 – 199 / 217 AD), who used animals in order to attempt to improve various human activity within the body. Specifically focusing on cures and treatment for those who don't have them. Later, Ibn Zuhr began to use animal testing to benefit humans in which he would perform surgeries on them to ensure that the procedures would not harm humans.