For one thing, defendants that use plea bargaining can evade the expenses and the time of defending himself or herself at a trail, as well as get around risking a worse sentence and the bad exposure that could cause. In addition, the prosecution also saves time and money by avoiding a long, drawn out trial, and both of the sides do not have to stress about going to the trail. It does not matter which side instigates the plea bargain, whether it be the prosecutor or the defendant, but both sides to have to completely agree with each other before something occurs out of that plea bargain. Because of the circumstances, I believe that justice was served. The victims will be compensated for counseling based on what Fogle did, and Fogle will serve his
I do not think that the plea bargain lets someone off easy. While they might receive a lesser change they also are having the fact that they admitted to doing something taken into consideration by the court system when they decide on the punishment. I feel that it equals out in the long run for those who end up taking the plea bargain. In small cases yes the person might get off with just probation, but is probation was something in condensation then the crime could not have been that detrimental. They would not offer something like probation to a deranged murderer if they confessed to killing someone.
There are many issues associated with plea bargaining. The accused could benefit with the possibility of a reduced or combined charges, reduced attorney fees, and the chance of a reduced or shorter sentence that may be imposed by going to trial. Plea bargaining can also give the prosecutors the ability to convict the accused even if they have a weak case and there is question whether or not they can get a conviction. It also will save time and resources necessary for trial. This will apply to defense attorneys as well, they may be unsure of their ability to get an acquittal for their client; however, in some cases the accused many know in his heart that he is innocent and want to go to trial.
It 's a common misconception that someone arrested for DUI must plead guilty in court. With a skilled defense attorney who can examine all the nuances of your individual case, you may very well find that you 're spared having to put your future on the line in this manner. You have the absolute right to challenge the procedures that were used during your arrest, the cause for which you were arrested, and the evidence being used against you. But you can 't do it alone. A skilled DUI lawyer can help you process the situation at hand and approach it from the most rational angle while protecting your every
However, a defendant might accept a plea bargain from the prosecution before trial, because the evidence against them is overwhelming. If that is not the case, the prosecution will have to prove their case to a jury beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant committed a crime, and the defendant should have to serve jail or prison time for their punishment as a result of their crime. In conclusion, many people believe the Texas Judicial Branch needs refurbishing for the 21st century. However, the Texas Judicial Branch operates efficiently now despite some minor issues that critics perceive as inadequate for the 21st century. Perhaps in the future, some areas of our judicial system could be streamlined to better meet the needs of our society as we grow our ever more diverse society here in the state of Texas.
Last but not least the most common type of bails bond used surety, Surety bond makes sure you show up to your court dates. There’s also advantages to pre-trail release and cons, pros if you can show the judge you can follow rules while on bond maybe give the defendant less time when they come back to court or get probation. While if you did the opposite the judge would give you a harsher
Plea bargaining- This is also called plea acceptance. It is the process where a defendant may plead guilty to a lesser offence in return for a more serious offence being dropped. This has the advantage of trying to avoid a long and expensive trail that may or may not produce a conviction. By accepting a guilty plea to a lesser charge, time and money could get saved by both the defence and the prosecution. The Judiciary- Judges have an important role within the court system, because they are legal experts of the law if the prosecution and defence are in dispute.
I believe that when attempting to convict a person of a crime, there should be plenty of physical evidence of that person doing the crime in order of there to even be a case. In many cases, repressed memories can be false, but the author of Repressed Memories: True and False, believes that in some cases repressed memories can be legit but neither should be used as a reliable source in a criminal case. Only reliable sources should be used when attempting to convict another on a crime they may or may not have done. Loftus experiments prove that cases that involve repressed memories as a primary source are typically weak cases (Reisner Paragraph 13). In reality, and type of evidence used in a criminal case should be physical.
When the jury trial process is replaced with plea negotiations, we lose trust and reliability in the system. When we give efficiency that the plea bargain has provided power, it comes at a substantial cost. People who are indeed innocent of the crimes they were convicted have now been influenced into pleading guilty for the sake of efficiency. Not to mention the collateral consequences that accompany a person when they plead out. It also undermines the reliability of convictions in general (Gilchrist, 2011).
The benefits in taking the unethical response is getting the confession, however, is this confession an actual true confession or just a confession from fear. The consequences to this type of deception is the possibility of the confession being thrown out of court and the defendant being set free or even worse, found not guilty. Most homicide detective should have a good working relationship with the prosecutors that prosecute homicide cases. The homicide detective should tell the prosecutor as soon as possible about the investigation, interrogation, and the outcome of the interrogation. This will allow the prosecutor to be able to defend your actions and find case law if
"Drop Dead " which is what some lawyers are describing Statute of Limitation Because, a case is dead if not filed by the deadline. Statute of Limitations are laws that set the deadlines for filling lawsuits in civil cases and for filling formal charges in criminal cases. Statute of Limitation is fair for both Plaintiff and the Defendant because, it helps to ensure fairness in legal disputes between individuals, diminish unreliable cases over time,help to create a level playing field for plaintiffs and defendants. To begin with, Statute of Limitations is fair for both Plaintiff and Defendant because it helps to ensure fairness in legal disputes between individuals. According to the article it stated "If the law failed to provide a deadline, then a person could face a lawsuit decades after an alleged injury happened."
What Makes a Criminal Defense Lawyer Ideal for You? There are times when we commit faults consciously or unconsciously or other times we are at a certain place at the wrong time, and whichever the case, being on the wrong side of the law has its consequences. When you have been accused of doing something wrong, particularly when the matter has been presented to a court of law, you must seek the services of a lawyer. Criminal lawyers are necessary for your case and can help you in respect to your circumstance. They help the seemingly guilty to get a fair hearing and judgment that is as minimal as possible.
It is necessary for a prosecutor to have an assumption of guilt combined with the legal concept of innocent until proven guilty because it provides for a fair criminal trail and also moves cases forward.b Within the textbook the authors address within the criminal justice system regarding the crime control model there is the presumption of guilt and the presumption of innocence. According the textbook, presumption of guilt is when “ the defendants who are not screened out early in the process by police and prosecutors are probably guilty and therefore can be passed quickly through the remaining stages in the process.” Where as the presumption of innocence is “holds that defendants are to be treated as through their guilt is an open question until they have been adjudicated guilty” (Hemmens, Brody, & Spohn, 2013, p.14). These presumptions, especially in regards to the crime control model, are important and I agree with them because they move cases forward in a timely manner that is uniform and predictable. Also, using this process allows for efficiency that the innocent people are ruled out to give rise to the guilty