In both the film V for Vendetta, directed by James McTeigue, and the short story “Harrison Bergeron”, written by Kurt Vonnegut Jr., there is a struggle regarding the negative control power that government holds within society. The government can be too much in control until the people’s civil liberties are in jeopardy, in which the tables will turn. Rebellion can be high within an individual or a society that feels the need to stand as a symbol for something. This theme is displayed in both the film and short story. Although the human society needs structure, where is the line drawn between the people’s civil liberties and how it affects the government? There are many examples of conflicts regarding how the government works around civil liberties. …show more content…
constitution prohibits cruel and unusual punishment from the government. When it comes to the death penalty many states and countries have outlawed this form of sentencing. It becomes a question of ethics when the perspective on issues can vary amongst individuals. In V for Vendetta, the treatment that Evey was receiving while she was being held was irrelevant to a crime they believe she committed with being V’s accomplice. Gordon mocked the situation of the Chancellor being the real threat to their government on his show, and was beaten and killed for his rendition of humor. Also, the torture that was received within St. Marys led to the rebellion of V to commit treason. Where in actuality a citizen would be punishable by death, as V is . There are many controversies today regarding the misuse of official power within the U.S. and other countries. Riots have broken out within the recent years with trying to fight against police officials, but one in particular is the Baltimore riot of 2015. The punishment of an African American male who was known as a drug offender was pronounced dead shortly after his spine was severed in half by a police official altercation. These are examples of the punishment that is permitted and frowned upon within the U.S. yet still occurs today …show more content…
Another civil liberty portrayed in the film V for Vendetta is pleading the fifth. It is well known that the Miranda rights within the U.S. are delivered to the person who is being taken into custody by police officials. Failure to deliver this warning to the criminal the prosecutor is unable to take the evidence that was said into consideration in the courtroom. Aside from knowing there are exceptions to this rule, our rights should always be protected and not manipulated. Although it is perceived that the government captures and interrogates Evey to provide information on V is a hoax planned by V himself, in reality they may have done the same if not worse had they found her. Evey being tortured and told that she would be killed for not giving the whereabouts of V is a tactic that the U.S. practiced in the seizure of the enemy combatants in Guantanamo Bay. In the event to obtain information from these enemies results in obscure torture such as water boarding, and being confined into small cells compromising their sleep with bombarding their senses. Although this is hypocritical to what the amendment stands for, the U.S. will make the necessary call of action in order to protect the citizens of the country . In “Harrison Bergeron”, the use of the handicaps is an unjust form of torture.
Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury and “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut Jr. are good examples of what would happen if one law was created to make a thriving utopia, but it turns it into a frightful dystopia. Both stories have one major law that attempts to create a utopia, but turns it into a dystopia. In Fahrenheit 451, the protagonist, Montag, and his friend, Clarisse, talk about how books are illegal in this society. It says “‘Do you ever read any of the books you burn?’ He laughed.
Democracy and personal rights are a key component of American society and belief system, but citizens have begun to take the liberties given to them for granted. They have been around for so long no one can imagine society without them. Bryan Rittgers takes on a sarcastic and witty tone in his satiric essay in order to portray the irony of undervaluing the importance of rights to normal American citizens. This essay is laced with extreme sarcasm and is written in a true satiric manner. Rittgers openly denounces the rights he has been given and pushes for the removal or restriction of them.
Comparative Analysis Essay In the story “Harrison Bergeron” and the Supreme Court Case Loving V. Virginia, the two reveal a resistance of government law ,resulting in rebellion. In Harrison Bergeron and Loving V. Virginia simularilay the two both resisted the government but in a different form. In the article Loving V. Virginia interracial marriages weren’t allowed it was illegal. Also because interracial marriage was illegal they had struggles,for example “During one exchange,Hirschkop stated that Virginia's interracial marriage law others like it were rooted in racism and white supremacy.
Since I began high school, language arts has been my most difficult class. It doesn’t quite click with me like math and science do, yet I continue to sign up for the advanced classes to challenge myself. Each assignment can have a huge impact on one’s grade since there aren’t many, and it only added to the stress of this particular essay missing the first couple days we had to work on it. Oddly, we were told to wait before writing the introduction; something I was okay with because introductions and conclusions cause me more apprehension than any other aspect of an essay. We were then told that we were to all write a specific type of introduction.
Everything around us in the world is constantly changing, so people often wonder, what is going to happen in the future. Many authors have had thoughts similar thoughts and fear that societies will start to fall apart. Ray Bradbury, author of Fahrenheit 451, and Kurt Vonnegut, author of “Harrison Bergeron” have their own ideas of what will occur in the future. These authors wrote books or short stories describing the fears they have for what societies are going to become in the future. Also, these authors tend to have a sort of pessimistic view on what will occur in the future.
Introduction How would you feel if you incriminated yourself because you were not advised of your rights? In 1963, Ernesto Miranda was interrogated by police for two hours before providing a written confession to kidnap and rape. The cops not only failed and tricked Miranda by never advising him of his rights, but the jury and the Supreme Court of Arizona also failed him. Miranda's case had a huge impact on law enforcement and the future of law enforcement to this day.
“Unjust laws exist: Shall we be content to obey them, or shall we endeavor to amend them” (Thoreau 945, par.16). Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. had written about resisting an unjust government in his piece, “Letter from Birmingham Jail”. In his essay “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience,” Henry David Thoreau also discusses the right and responsibility to resist an unjust government. Since King and Thoreau both use current events in their time as examples of injustice, use historical and biblical references, how they can’t wait any longer to make a change, both provide strong arguments on how important it is to stand up against the injustice put upon American people by the government; however, King and Thoreau were inspired to write by different causes
In response to the 9-11 threat, the US Government increased security measures dramatically and restricted citizen rights in order to reinforce public safety. Therefore because of this political context, James Mcteigue, director of V for Vendetta, values complete freedom, manifested through V’s action plan for blowing up Parliament to ultimately give citizens back their rights. Mcteigue’s value of freedom is fundamentally relevant to the film, as similarly to The Book Thief, it fortifies the film’s response to such a political context, through the themes of totalitarian brutality and the power of words. The importance of language is seen in V’s interruption on National Television; "We must never lose it, or sell it, or give it away.
The question about the federal government that I address in this assignment is about the citizens’ rights that the Fifth Amendment to the United States’ Constitution contains, along with the Miranda rights. Based on what we discussed in Chapter 4, the Fifth Amendment includes the right that protects the American citizens from self-incrimination in the event of an accusation. In that regard, the right, together with the Miranda right that gives citizens the right to clamp up provides immunity for the involved citizen against police interrogation that could culminate in forced and unfair self-incrimination. Even so, the current system of law enforcement is such that police officers can ask the accused any question they want without informing
V for Vendetta Argumentative Analysis V for Vendetta stresses how one person can change a whole country and effect all of the citizens of the country. This is an extremely important topic because today there are many tyrant countries that act similar to the fictional English government in the movie. The Government’s argument to the citizens is ineffective for multiple reasons, such as the fact that they lost trust in their citizens and the lost to V in the end. The Government is very selective with the evidence they portray to the citizens and hide a lot from their citizens.
The problem arose when the police officers said they had not advised Miranda of his right to an attorney. Miranda’s lawyer was concerned that his Sixth Amendment Right had been violated. This case was noticed by the ACLU and was taken to the Supreme Court. This case raised issues within the Supreme Court on the rights of Criminal Defendants.
We live our lives in fear. Some of us fear failure, maybe you fear the dark, others fear heights. While some of humanities fears may be irrational, there is no denying that everyone experiences fear. But how does fear affect us? How does it affect our actions?
The two stories, “Harrison Bergeron” and Fahrenheit 451, both have common themes. The common themes of the stories may include; our reliance on technology can spiral out of control if we let it, knowledge is joyful and painful, and that we can be confined by our own self-censorship. All of these themes are exhibited throughout both stories frequently. Whether it is as Montag has conflict with his wife over books or as Harrison’s parents forget right from wrong in their society. In Fahrenheit 451, their technology definitely gets out of control.
Life is a competition, however sometimes others make the competition unfair and it is the right of the society to revolt against these barriers. In today’s society, the fear of oppression lingers in the minds of every man, woman, and child and for these two narratives, that fear has become a reality. In a dystopian future, V for Vendetta and The Hunger Games Trilogy both demonstrate a similar archetypal pattern: one of rebellion against an oppressive government which results in social identity that helps inspire the oppressed. Both narratives are set in the realm of an oppressive government which motivates the main protagonists to revolt against them for the injustices committed against the people. In V for Vendetta, V seeks revenge against the Norsefire regime for past wrong-doings, particularly events that were orchestrated by members of the very same party and their oppressive control over the people of London.
The government is supposed to serve the people. However, in some cases, the government serves themselves instead. For example, some destructive governments may try to take away the peoples’ freedom of speech, and right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Similarly, in the stories, “The Censors” and “Harrison Burgeron,” the authors explore how these totalitarian governments can hinder people’s ability to thrive. These governments completely control people.