The Things They Carried, written by Tim O’Brien and Slaughterhouse Five, written by Kurt Vonnegut, and both books that are an example of anti-war in literature. Both O’Brien and Vonnegut were both war veterans and put themselves in their own books. The books both portray the horrors of war. In both these novels they spoke on the destructiveness of war and how it also destroys the way a person thinks. They have discussed on how they cope with all the things they went through at war. These men were all sent to war because the government said they needed to and it was not by choice. It was something they needed to do because that is how society was back then. The connections the authors have with their characters in the novels allows them to …show more content…
The authors often time don't tell the story exactly as it happened in real life. They both change the story to evoke the emotions out of the readers. As O’Brien said in the chapter “Notes,” on how the story about Norman Bower “that part of the story is my own” (O’Brien 161). In the first chapter of Slaughterhouse Five, Kurt Vonnegut begins “All this happened, more or less” (Vonnegut 1). There is such thing of story-truth and story-happening. “Happening-truth is an objective factual account of events which occurred. Story-truth, sometimes referred to as emotional truth, is a subjective reflection of a person’s thoughts and feelings about the same event when retelling that story” (IGI Global). These authors being war veterans, write these stories and change them up a bit to cope with what they have experienced at war. As O’Brien writes in the novel, “story-truth is truer sometimes than happening-truth” (O’Brien 179). O’Brien often writes in story-truth to let the readers live that experience with him and feel what he felt during that time. He lets the readers wonder if these stories are true or not. Their goal was to make readers feel the pain, the …show more content…
They depict the life when they are at war and also post war. The authors views on war are also similar to each other. They both considered death not a big deal because it’s something normal to them now being part of the war. They talk about people dying and then move on from it like it did not mean anything to them. Another similarity that these two authors share is that they both satirize war. What their main goal of writing their books was to show the real horrors of war and not the bloody parts of it. They never intended to show how bloody and messy war could get. They wanted go show the real life effects of it and how it could affect their
“How to Tell a True War Story” and “Ambush” are stories that both explore on topics: truth, the real definition of a true war story, and the role of truth. O 'Brien starts off “How to Tell a True War Story” with “This is true.” Starting this story with such a bold sentence not only makes it seem more true, but to some extent, it acts as a comfort statement to the narrator’s own doubts, as if there were unspeakable uncertainties and lies of the narrator. The title of this story also comes into play, with a meta-fictional name “How to Tell a True War Story”, as if it were a guide, a manual, having a true war story tell the readers how to tell a true war story. However ironically, towards the middle of the story, us as
Walt Whitman’s “The Artilleryman’s Vision” and the letter to his mother are two pieces of work by the same author. The two pieces of work share some key differences. Other than being two different types of works, there differences go deeper than that. The characters and settings are both very different and yet, they still manage to to seem similar. They also have completely different writing styles and choice of words due to the different writing styles.
Challenges at War Robert E. Lee once said, “What a cruel thing war is… to fill our hearts with hatred instead of love for our neighbors”. The novel The Things They Carried by Tim O’Brien takes place in Vietnam. He and a handful of other men experience things only one can image and hope they will never have to experience again. They learn how death among them can greatly affect them, and many others. War is not an easy task to get through and these men all had different coping methods.
The books that are being compared and contrasted are both about The Civil War and what these soldiers went through. Each book has a few differences that separate them. The books are based on the same time period so they are going to have a lot in common. The books describe what both characters had to go through during the war. The differences in the book will show you how each soldier went through the war differently and the similarity’s will show you how it was for most of the soldiers in the Civil War.
O’Brien’s intended audience was young people who were not educated about the war and he discussed the themes shame/guilt and mortality/death. The chapter “The Things They Carried” gives an introduction about the men in the group, it also shows shame/guilt. The chapter talks about the equipment each soldier carried and how it affected them. During this chapter it focuses primarily on LT.
Regret is a powerful emotion that has the ability to scar someone for the rest of their life. Moments of regret can come from relationships, self-made decisions and life changing events. The idea of regret also applies to “A Marker on the Side of the Boat” by Bao Ninh and “On the Rainy River” by Tim O’Brien. Although these two literary pieces are very different in many ways, both authors describe the experience of the Vietnam War as a time of regretful decisions that negatively impacted people of both the American side and the Vietnamese side. Both authors tell a story about a character that recalls of flashbacks of the war, where they grieve over the past decisions that have affected them for the rest of their life.
In The Things They Carried, O’Brien reveals his view on war through telling his readers how the Vietnam War had no point, was emotionally devastating, and displaying that there is no purpose in war unless the soldiers know what they are fighting for. O’Brien shows the pointlessness of war by
O'Brien shows us that "In many cases a true war story cannot be believed. If you believe it, be skeptical. It's a question of credibility. Often the crazy stuff is true and the normal stuff isn't, because the normal stuff is necessary to make you believe the truly incredible craziness." (pg. 71).
This portrayal reveals the shared humanity of the soldiers on both sides and how in war beauty and horror
War is one of the most complex yet completely understood subjects to read or write about. Tim O’Brien has captured the true essence of being drafted into a war. “The Things They Carried” is a novel composed of multiple short stories; Each taking the reader through the perspective of the narrator showing his multiple landscapes, situations, and changing feelings from being drafted into the Vietnam War to surviving it. These stories really help one understand the effects of war on someone’s mind as well as body. Tim O’Brien is the main character and protagonist in this novel.
Then the clash of generations like adults and teens students and adults then children and parents.like adults and sam how the adults want to stay there in peaceIn My Brother Sam Is Dead although both sides of war are shown author 's collier and collier ultimately argue that war is unfair and hard. Like In the war it affected families and tore them apart.they also clash with generations like with adults and tennagers.then principals vs reallity principals as in sam fighting for freedom and reallity like all the horrible deaths.this is the kind of stuff that hapened in My Brother Sam Is Dead whille the revoloutionary war. In My Brother Sam Is Dead there is a lot of conflict in families during the war which leads into divided families. In the book
It is tremendously hard to interpret the word and definition of war itself. “War is what happens when language fails” according to Margaret Atwood. It is an individual approach and very personal sense of understanding the general philosophy of this complex conflict between the school of thoughts, ideologies or other social problems, where people play the major role of those engaged ones and those who are affected by the burdens that the war may carry. People are exposed to their deepest fears and they struggle for bringing them their freedom and democracy back. Both War Horse and American Sniper pass timeless values.
Kurt Vonnegut’s novel Slaughterhouse-Five chronicles the life of Billy Pilgrim, a fictional character loosely based on Vonnegut’s own experiences in World War II. The Things They Carried, Tim O’Brien’s fictional novel that is set during the height of the Vietnam War. Both authors incorporate fact and fantasy scenes in their writings, albeit in different contexts. Vonnegut’s novel travels throughout time and brings the reader to both non-fictional and fantastical scenes. Conversely, O’Brien’s novel is written in chronological order, but also incorporates fact and fantasy into the timeline of the story.
History does not always convey the absolute truth. It offers only one side of the story. The strong and powerful voices always drown out the sounds of the weak and beaten. The winner’s word will always be taken over the loser’s. The content that lies within the textbooks was not written by the defeated.
Red Platoon by Clinton Romesha gives the reader a first person view of a solider during the events leading battle of Kamdesh. The book starts off by covering Clinton’s tours in Iraq and his training back at Fort Carson in Colorado springs. As the book progresses it explains what the day to day life at COP (Combat Outpost) Keating and all the concerns of the soldiers at the outpost. Next the book explains what each soldier was doing during the battle and it explains all the people it took to liberate the base. The book concludes by explaining what each soldier's life was after the battle and explains how Clinton Romesha received his medal of honor.