Kyle Neidig HIST 101 Journal 2 What events eroded the bonds of empire during the 1760s? The event that began the eroding the bonds of empire during the 1760s was the sugar act of 1764. The sugar act placed a new burden on the Navigation Acts, which forced Americans to trade almost exclusively with Britain. This was an issue because the navigation acts were n primarily intended to raise money for the British government, but sugar act changed the relationship between America and Britain because parliament now expected the colonies to generate revenue (American Stories P. 118). Americans believed that the Sugar Act taxed the colonists in a manner inconsistent with their rights and privileges as British subjects. The sugar act never resulted in any violent protests, and the protests stayed within to the colonial assemblies, merchants, and the upper class who had personal interests in commerce. This event started to get …show more content…
The most significant political conflict President Jackson faced while in office was his controversial use of executive power to fight and ultimately destroy the second Band of the United States. It started with Jackson vetoing a bill calling for an early renewal of the Second Bank’s charter. In 1933 Jackson started his attack on the Bank by removing all federal deposits from the bank. After Jackson had Roger B. Taney, secretary of the treasury, cease all government money from the bank and had the funds place in twenty-three state banks. To try and dispute what Jackson was doing, the president of the Bank called in outstanding loans and instituting a policy of credit contraction that helped bring on a recession in hopes to show that without the Bank the economy would greatly suffer. Jackson’s regime accused the president of the bank of deliberately and unnecessarily causing distress out of personal resentment and a desire to maintain his unchecked powers and privileges, which resulted in the bank never regaining its charter (American Stories P.
Following the legacy of Alexander Hamilton, Clay was a strong supporter of the Bank of the United States, which was a part of his American system. Clay saw the bank as a necessity for economic growth in America. However, when the bank was up for re-charter in 1832, Andrew Jackson vetoed the bill. In his well-written veto Jackson, explained his decision to veto the bill citing it unconstitutional. Jackson believed “if the government would stop creating inequality by giving artificial stimulation to the engines of the Market Revolution…men would be left in a state of modest but natural inequality” .
Jackson despised the Second Bank of the United States, as he believed it favored the wealthy, it was privately owned, and he lost his own money once with a bank. He thought his hatred for the bank would be used against him in the next election, which was the plan, but it did not work out in the way Clay expected it to. As Jackson was attempting to end the bank, Clay tried to recharter the it, hoping that when Americans saw Jackson’s veto, they would be furious and he would lose the election. While Clay thought this plan was foolproof, the bank was never a legitimate concern for most citizens, so Jackson won the election for the second time. Once he had been re-elected, Jackson killed the bank by taking federal money out of it and giving power back to the states, but this inflated the price when the money is not backed.
Accessed October 12, 2015. http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/disp_textbook.cfm? smtID=3&psid=3923. “President Jackson 's Veto Message Regarding the Bank of the United States; July 10, 1832.” Yale Law School Lillian Goldman Law Library The Avalon Project.
The relationship between Britain and its American colonies was civil at first but began to strain in the mid-1700’s. In the beginning, Britain ruled colonies with little involvement because they were busy dealing with the French and Indian War among other things. As a result of this, the colonies were typically left in charge of themselves with little interference from British authorities. After years of being left alone, the colonists had developed a feeling of freedom and independence. When the war ended there was a significant change in the relations between England and the colonies.
national bank. As Jacksons term continued, he truly grew a desire to crush the Second Bank of the United states. Over time Jackson decided that it could not continue how it was, and that it did not want warrant reform, it must be destroyed. Jacksons reason for this conclusion was a result of his past financial problems, his views on states’ rights, and his tennesse roots. The Second Bank centralized financial might, jeopardizing economic stability; it served as a monopoly on fiscal policy, but it did not answer to anyone within the government.
Between 1763 and 1775, there were three ‘Imperial Crises’ which occurred between the British and the American colonists. The conflict that was produced during this period arose through an undefined balance of political and economic power between the two parties. In 1763, Britain had just concluded the French and Indian war and was left with an immense and almost crippling debt of around 140 million pounds sterling (“Turning Point In American History”). In Britain’s eyes, the most effective way to reduce this debt was increased taxes. Unfortunately, the people of England were already massively overtaxed, which meant the last option for the British was to tax the American colonists.
He disliked the bank so much that he moved all the money to all the state banks he created. In document J, it shows Jackson standing a the constitution which is ripped up to shreds. When you walk all over something you are taking advantage of it and abusing its power and this is what Jackson was doing to the constitution. He is holding veto papers in who hand which stands for vetoing the bank and a scepter in the other. He has a crown on his head that represents as the king because he is forgetting about the people and acting like a kink and a dictator.
Jackson 's push to abolish national banks other wise known as "the bank wars" was one of his more well known pushes for small government. In 1832, Jackson had vetoed a bill calling for an early renewal of the Second Bank’s charter, but renewal was still possible when the charter expired
In the document “Jackson Battles the Bank”, it shows Jackson fighting off a monster, or the national bank, with a veto stick. Jackson was fighting to destroy the national bank. He wanted to do this because it favored the rich and not the common people. He was fighting for people to have equal rights. Instead of having no bank at all, he came up with the idea to create state banks which wouldn’t be as powerful as the National Bank.
From what I read and what he said, I thought it sounded like he didn’t want to shut down the United States Bank. And then in Document 5, Webster acted like Jackson should put an end to the bank by saying, “It manifestly seeks to inflame the poor against the rich, it wantonly attacks whole classes of the people, for the purposes of turning against them the prejudices and resentment of the other classes.”
In this veto letter against the new bank, he states,”It is regretted that the rich and powerful too often bent the acts of government their selfish purposes” (Jackson, 1832). This proves Jackson’s worries for the national money because of what the private corporations would do to with bank’s money. This was because they owned more than the majority of the bank. He also shows that he is worried about the national money. As stated before he said that the rich and powerful which are the corporations often bend the rules to benefit only themselves but not to the nation.
In this attack, he moved about 20% of United States’ money into private banks. These banks were known as ‘’pet’’ banks because they politically supported Andrew Jackson. This causes what we know as The Bank War. Andrew Jackson enlarged credit by doing away with the bank. Andrew Jackson then moved the money from those banks into the private ones that only supported him.
One of the biggest thing that Jackson had done as a president was in 1832. Jackson vetoed a bill that would renew the second bank charter early. Jackson stated “I will kill it!”. He said this because he didn’t like the bank at all and he believed that it made the rich richer and the poor poorer. He said in his veto message “It is easy to conceive that great evils to our country and its institutions might flow from such a concentration of power in the hands of a few men irresponsible to the people.”
The French-Indian War of 1754-1763 resulted in political, ideological, and economic alterations within Britain and its American colonies. The French and Indian War, also referred to as The Seven Years War, began with British and French conflicts across the Ohio River Valley, as both nations wanted to claim the land for themselves. The first blood of the French-Indian War began with multiple British failures, including Washington’s dreadful defeat at Fort Necessity and General Braddock’s failed attempt at conquering Fort Duquesne, in which he died along with two-thirds of his army (Document C). The British would, however, gain momentum in 1759 with multiple victories, including their most significant triumph, Quebec.
Jackson went against the Supreme Court “Although the bank was found to be constitutional by the Supreme Court, Jackson was determined to eliminate it.” Proving that, once again, Andrew Jackson went outside his jurisdiction. Jackson was a cause of the Panic of 1837, “The Panic of 1837 was influenced by the economic policies of President Jackson”. Leading me to the conclusion that Jackson's personal opinions caused an economic crisis.