“For good or ill, over the past two centuries the western way of war has become dominant all over the world.” This quote is from The Cambridge History of Warfare, as written by Geoffrey Parker. There are several different Western Ways of War, which “boasts great antiquity” according to Geoffrey Parker. Some of these ways of war include superior technology, having impeccably trained soldiers, and expanding the army. “The steady spread of western military power rested on far more than the triad of technology, discipline and an aggressive military tradition.” In this case, the western way of war that best exemplifies warfare in the American Civil War is “innovation”, as described by Parker. According to Parker, this innovation can apply to technology …show more content…
For the Civil War, this meant that expanding the armies in particular was the “secret weapon” that ultimately won the war. Specifically, allowing former slaves to participate in the army is one of the biggest contributions to the Union’s success. It didn’t hurt that the Union was able to support the increase in their army financially, and this in turn increased the Union’s power. Parker states that this financial advantage helps to increase the overall power of the state in question: in this case the Union in the Civil war. Allowing former slaves to join the army for the Union was ultimately what clinched their victory on many fronts. As Ryan Holiday states in his article: “The war began because of slavery, and it ended and was won because of …show more content…
Though there were many of aspects of the North’s victory, such as help from the telegraph and railroad systems, certain excellent military strategies by the Union, there was also the factor of allowing former slaves into the army. Innovation - as outlined by Geoffrey Parker - is only one of the Western Ways of War, but it is easily the one that best exemplified warfare during the Civil War. This partially comes from “A willingness to accept ideas from all quarters.” This is shown through several ways, such as: the way black people flocked to the Union in order to fight against slavery, and the way fight against their former slaves strategically crippled the South. This is also shown through the North quickly accepting newer technologies, and unique strategies. Though the North did not treat many of these former slaves very well, they still gained the tactical advantage by adapting and letting those former slaves be better equipped fight. All of these factors combined are what helped to win the war in the
The American Civil War proved that prolongated 19th Century wars would replace pre-1809 Napoleonic-era rapid decisive wars. The victors of 19th Century warfare were militaries that successfully exhausted their opponent and broke their opponent’s will to fight. The North’s
The southern natives needed slaves for their “plantation based economy. ”(P.469) Before the battle at Fort Sumter, President Lincoln called up the militia, he requested 75,000 men to assist him in restoring obedience to the law of the United States. Virginia, North Carolina, Tennessee and Arkansas left the Union for the Confederacy. The North military advantage over the south was very significant.
During the feud between the North and South, the South were establishing a military that seemed to be well-built and stronger, in comparison to the forces of the North. However, the South had many inexperienced troops that were very unorganized and ill prepared. Also, in comparison to the North, the South's food supply and resources, were minimal. In the North, manufacturing gave them the upper-hand,
The Civil War was fought on U.S soil during the 1800’s for the cause to bring the nation back together and later in the war, to end slavery. As a result, The North or the Union ended up beating their opponent, the Confederacy. Why did the Union beat the Confederates? The Union won this battle because of material, economic and population advantages and the role that the African-Americans played in the war. First, the union had advantages in material, economics, and population.
.The Civil War changed the country in many ways. Thousands of men on both sides died during the Civil War. “The Union Army lost 352, 528 men and the Confederate Army lost 258,000 men” (Doc F). Innovative ways to fight came about during the Civil War.
Historian, George Frederickson addresses the blue over the gray and sources of success and failure in the Civil War. He emphasizes the North’s advantages providing many plausible explanations of why the North won. He mentions the North’s advantages in manpower, resources, and industrial capacity. The North had an excess of three to one readily available manpower. For every southern industrial worker, the North had a factory or workshop.
The North had many advantages. They beat the South in population they could draw soldiers from. The North had 22 million citizens where the South only had 5.5 million citizens. The North could transport supplies and people faster because of their roads, canals, and railroads. However the South disconnected from itself with barely any railroads and hard to move soldiers and goods from place to place.
advantage, powerful military leaders which served them nicely in the beginning battles. However motivation for equality drove the Union to victory. Although, Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863 and pushed for the 13th amendment, which he believed was crucial for peace, he did not live to see the abolishment of racial prejudice. The 13th Amendment commands that "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, exceptas a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United.
Uncompromising differences between the South (Confederacy) and the North (Union) created a civil war that lasted five years. During this war, Abraham Lincoln was president. His election led to the secession of many Southern states. After refusing to recognize the Confederacy as its own nation, the American Civil War commenced in 1861. The three main causes of the Civil War between the North and the South were industrial and agricultural economies, politics, and slavery.
The north was able to use the devastating amount of resources against the South to win the war. The northern resources even allowed there to be effective transportation for the Union soldiers. Union troops could use the higher mileage of railroads to there advantage to transport soldiers quicker during the war as well. The creation of Ironclads was possible with the north’s resources. Document three displays one of the first Ironclads built.
There were several “new” kinds of technology in the Civil War era. Many of those new technologies changed the way that the war was fought, and how effective certain strategies were. These new technologies not only affected life during the war, but also affected life after the war. There were several different kinds of technology used by both sides in the war, such as telegraphs, railroads, and the first submarines. Telegraphs were used to send messages back and forth, and were much quicker than sending it via a messenger on horseback.
During the years of the civil war the north had a lot of advantages over the south, including money, ports, army sizes, ect…
During the late 1850’s and early 1860’s, people would gather for a family day at the local battlefield, after all, it was a spectacle. Unfortunately, those people didn’t know of the advancements that were being made in the field of warfare, and they paid a deadly price. The Civil War is best summed up by Christian Wolmar: By making use of innovations in communications, weaponry and transport, principally the railroads, the belligerents, especially the North, developed a new type of war that was fought with much wider use of technology and in a way that relied on mobility and flexibility far more than its predecessors. The Civil War was more than just a war between two opposing sides fighting for what they believed in.
The North had many advantages over the South the helped them win the civil war. These reasons included a central leadership, more resources, and recruiting black men for their armies. These reasons helped the North win the civil war and play a big part in how successful they would be. With having advantages, better tactics when fighting, and also a higher population, the North would use strategic planning to fight the South and ultimately win the civil war.
One, in particular, would be the North’s abundance of soldiers. Edwin C. Bearss claims, “The South lost the Civil War because of a number of factors. It was inherently weaker in the various essentials to win a military victory in the North. The north had a population of more than twenty-two million people to the South’s nine and a half million of whom four and a half million were slaves”. With the North having more people to go to war with, it was clear their army would be able to defeat the South.