Augustus was only 17 year old when he had a positive relationship with the Senate because Augustus wanted to raise the tone of the Senate, reduce, its numbers, restore its former dignity, increase responsibility of its members and improve its efficiency. This relationship with the Senate remained for the rest of the Julio- Claudian Dynasty. Thus shows that Augustus had a positive relationship with the Senate.
One of Augustus main aims was to reduce the size of the Principate he would work with, Augustus had reduced its numbers from 1000 and 800 in 23BC and then 600 in 27BC, and then 400 in 18BC by removing disreputable members who entered the Senate prior to Augustus through bribery or influence. Augustus laid down a monetary qualification of one million sesterces and added worthy men from the equestrian class.
Augustus had reduced the numbers of sessions of the senate to two months, and to make things more efficient, he set up a senate community of himself. Augustus also appointed senators to newly create a position such as the curatorships of the aqueduct or of the public works such as
…show more content…
Augustus had made many important reforms in his rule, by having to control everything in Rome and making the senators work for him to build and do the thing for him. The senates were an advisory body whose advice becomes law via the consuls, praetors, and by confirmation by the assemblies of the citizens in Rome. Augustus had mad the laws so strongly that if women or a man do anything behind his back, he willpower send them to a different region, and get them killed by putting them with the animals to die. When Augustus made the laws across he directly made his plans to the people to present his Tribunician
Simon Baker's Ancient Rome, Tiberius Gracchus realized that the Senate was not in the best interest of the people and therefore tried to address one of Rome's biggest problems by become tribune and give the people back there land. He appealed to the common people by promising that he would get back what was rightful there's. This lead to him being voted in as tribune, and from there the problems of Rome, attempted solutions, and obstacles he faced only spiraled him down faster. Tiberius was well loved by the people, but not so much by the Senate. Simon Baker's Ancient Rome says it best by saying "As Tiberius left the Senate House in disgrace, he received a very different reception from the Roman people" (86).
The Senate was a group of legislators that was selected from the elite and wealthy class The Senate had two co consults to keep each other in balance There was a dictator that controlled everything when the Republic was in danger Caesar conquered several lands with the help of Pompey and Crassus By 48 BCE, Caesar was in control of all of Rome’s holdings
(Document F) As stated in and reflected in a fresco of the Roman Senate by artist Macari (Document F), the Senate had responsibilities and rights, among others, to control war, make foreign alliances, as well as control of public lands among others. While the Greeks may have had more equal representation, it was only through a quorum that they could conduct business (Document E). Athens also ostracized people who became powerful and were seen as a threat, and it was difficult to fulfill their responsibilities of citizenship (Document
Roman VS United States senate The Roman and United States senate are both very similar, and it is clear that the Roman Senate was a precursor to the United States Senate. As the Roman Senate came first and we could watch the history unfold, the United States made smarter decisions to create a more stable and people-serving government. Those who do not learn history repeat it, and with the advantage of time the US Senate got to learn from the Romans mistakes. I will be taking the position that the United States Senate is better and more efficient than the Roman Senate. I am going to give a light overview of each Senate, and compare and contrast them.
After Carthage Rome’s hunger for new lands was nearly insatiable, this perhaps was brought about by the very act of the long war with the Carthaginians. Changes were in store for Rome due to their now very war-like attitude. Changes in senate policy along with social order would reorganize Rome for the foreseeable future. Consuls and tribunes held positions in the senate, both of whom were strongly linked to the army therefore the senate would ultimately control the Roman army. “[…] the tribunes alone […] are subject to them, and bound to obey their commands.”
In discussion of Agrippa it is important to consider his beginnings. He was adopted by Augustus at the age of fifteen, when Germanicus was eighteen and Tiberius was forty-six. Due to Tiberius’ track record, he was the obvious choice for succession. He had been consul twice and invested with tribunicia potestas for a period of five years. The question of why Agrippa was even adopted by Augustus is raised by Pettinger, as it is obvious who was going to be succeeding Augustus as princeps.
Tyranny is everywhere, the only way it’s not is if we can prevent it ourselves. One of America’s first governments was the Articles of confederation. The Articles of Confederation was shown to be corrupt and couldn’t get the job done, the government didn’t consist of any sort of chief executive, no court system and a weak central government, due to the inability of the government to enforce taxes. The people decided it needed to go. James Madison and a group of men decided to come together in an event known as the Cconstitutional Cconvention, in order to create a new system of government.
Augustus came to power as a result of his predecessor’s adoption of him. Before Julius Caesar formally adopted him, Augustus already had a firm political foundation, thanks to the numerous office's members of his family held. Augustus’ birth father “was the first in the family to attain senatorial rank.” Additionally, Augustus’ father had held a praetorship.
Caesar Augustus, one of the greatest leaders who ruled from 62 BC – 14 AD. He was extremely wealthy, which gave him more power compared to other leaders of his time. He was able to make changes which helped him reorganize life in Rome. "... he believed in ancestral values such as monogamy, chastity, and piety (virtue). Thus, he introduced a number of moral and political reforms in order to improve Roman society and formulate a new Roman government and lifestyle" (Fefe 3).
“With the help of the military at his command, it was possible to conquer new territories and so gain a triumph and the pleasure of knowing that your name would be remembered forever in statues and inscribed in monuments paid for by the war” (Summary of Julius Caesar 's Life and Death). As time went on Julius Caser began to develop more power over the years. Julius made his way to praetor ship by 62 BC, and many of the senates felt he was a dangerous, ambitious man. (Julius Caser Biography) Just like Abraham Lincoln, Julius Cesar began to have more enemies once he started getting more power.
In Roman comedy, like in Greek comedy that came before it, Roman writers enjoyed to poke fun at social norms. Augustus sought to protect the Roman Empire’s longevity and in doing so elevated the power held by the paterfamilias. In a Roman family absolute authority is held by the father or the head of the household. The power of the paterfamilias was unrestricted and enabled him as the head of the house to control every aspect in the lives of his family. Most dramatically the form of this power was exercised in vitae necisque potestas or his ability to sentence his family members to death.
While Augustus claimed to have restored the republic through constitutional means, the historical evidence and opinion dominant at this time is that Augustus established a military monarchy by his intimate alliance with and support from the military to enforce and legitimize his rule, and accounts describe that he "...enticed the soldiers with gifts, the people with grain, and all men with the allurement of peace and gradually grew in power, concentrating in his own hands the functions of the senate, the magistrates, and the laws" Tacitus DOC
The Senate decided this was an opportunity for Pompey to take charge although many Senators became concerned of what may result in giving one man so much power. They had such reason to fear this as in 70BC a joint consulship was elected by the Popular Assembly between Pompey and Marcus Licinius Crassus, an extremely wealthy Roman general and politician. Although Sulla had in place, laws to prevent Pompey reaching such office at such a young age (34), Pompey’s overwhelming popularity easily overcame these obstacles and held no reason to pass through normal stages of office. The joint consulship of Crassus and Pompey was one of the most crucial political developments in the fall of the Roman Republic. It allowed for laws to once again be changed including restoring the power of tribunes.
Here are the few of Augustus achievements. Augustus abolished the system of tax farming, and he replaced the tax farmers with salaried civil service tax collectors. A tax farming is a common practice of the Roman where the trouble of tax collection was passed by the Roman State to the private individuals. Also, Augustus he begin religious reform to reanimate the belief of his people in traditional Gods. According to Augustus the lengthy civil war lead to collapse of Rome: The temple across the empire was fallen to decay, so Augustus renew all those temple that had fallen and to gain the trust of his people in the traditional Gods to bring back the Rome.
During his 57 years of rule he sought to avoid – at least by the letter of the law – more official power that his colleagues had (RG 34) He did that by succeeding to have the Senate and the people as the instigators of those positions. At the same time he also made a point of not accepting those that might affect their republican sensitivities such as refusing to accept the post of guardian of laws and customs but also of the dictatorship and perpetual consulship mentioned in RG 5.1 and RG 5.3. Also on leaving office, Augustus like the other consuls, swore that he had done nothing contrary to the laws (Dio Cass.