Chapter one sheds the light on the theoretical side of this research work. It is divided into two main parts: the first part will be concerned with assessments in general and the second part with the assessment of the speaking skill in particular. The first part first introduces the definition of the key concepts of the study, then mention in some detailed way the main principles of tests and testing. After that, it provides a historical point of view of testing and assessments. The second part firstly investigates the nature of the term speaking providing different views. Then, it deals with the assessment of this skill mentioning the types of speaking tests, the challenges that face test developers in designing such tests, the different tasks …show more content…
In this sense, the distinctions are mentioned: 1-3-1 Summative and Formative Assessment A distinction is made between summative and formative assessment. Summative assessment or “assessment of learning” is a graded assessment carried out at the end of a course or programme of study in order to measure what the learners have learnt “… for purposes of certification and (latterly) accountability” (Torrance & Pryor, 1998, p. 8). Final and proficiency exams are examples of summative assessment. However, Formative Assessment or “assessment forof learning” is often a non-graded assessment that takes place during a course aiming at promoting the level of students by providing them with useful feedback, A key development in the formative assessment process, and an indispensable condition for improvement, is that the student comes to hold a notion of the standard or desired quality similar to that of the teacher, is able to monitor the quality of what is being produced at the time of production, and is able to regulate their work appropriately.(Gipps, 1994, p. 126) The positive point is the fact that learners can adjust their learning, before it is too late. Chapter One Literature …show more content…
1-3-2-1 Formal Assessment Formal assessment is performed under special classroom conditions. It is evaluated by giving grades to each student’s work. There are four main types of test: Placement test, Achievement test, Proficiency test, and Diagnostic test. A placement test is needed to place learners in their right classes according to their levels “The aim is to produce groups which are homogeneous in level that will use institutional and teacher time most effectively.” (Harris & McCann, 1994, p. 29). It has to be noted in this type of assessment that it should be performed at the beginning of the year or the course as its function is to put the learners in their right classes. Anachievementtest is performed at the end of a course to determine how much learners have learnt, or, as its name indicates, what learners have achieved at the end of a course, “...their purpose being to establish how successful individual student, groups of students, or the courses themselves have been in achieving objectives.” (Hughes, 2003, p.
This is done now through the process of having a two assessment category- formative and summative. Both of these categories are used to determine the student’s quarter and semester grade. The summative category would be based on four common assessments, and one of these must be a performance task. As for formative assessments, this would show students the progress that they have made in mastering the material that would appear during the summative exam. He continues by saying that the school has realized that they can no longer control student’s grades based on behavioral infractions.
If they are successful in this, it is then evident they learned something from the unit and what was taught. For the second assessment, it asks many different types of questions, including true/false, multiple choice, open ended, and word problems. By doing this, students are having to use their knowledge and understanding of the material and apply it to many different types of
ANALYSE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ASSESSMENT METHODS IN RELATION TO MEETING THE INDIVIDUAL NEEDS OF LEARNERS. UNIT 2, 6.2 Race, P. (2009) says “we need a richer mix of high-quality assessment formats, and we also need to decrease the overall burden of assessment for ourselves and for our students. We need to measure less, but measure it better.' Using a variety of assessment methods gives students more scope to demonstrate their knowledge and skills across a range of contexts. By adopting a wider catalogue of assessments I can also help support students who may for one reason or another be underprivileged by the extensive use of particular assessment formats.
Describe the purpose of each of these two types of assessment. 1. Universal Screening: All students are assessed using a universal screening to identify students exhibiting learning difficulties. Typically, the students’ who scored fall below the 25% are considered to be placed in a Tier 1 to begin an immediate intervention. Frequency of the screening, selection of the screening measure, criteria
Standardized tests have been historically used to measure how students compare with each other and how much of a particular curriculum they have learned. Increasingly, standardized tests are being used to make major decisions about students, such as grade promotion or high school graduation, and schools(Galegroup). Standardized testing is not an effective measurement of how capable and knowledgeable a student is due to it negatively impacting schools, its serious limitations, and its harm on student’s learning. The greater emphasis that has been placed on standardized testing in public schools has created a significant negative impact on the education system.
The tests have multiple categories but in the main courses students need to take are Reading/Writing, Mathematics, Social Studies, Science. These tests are scored in a predictable way which
I think there should be an increase in formative assessment testing after each concept is taught to see if the student is retaining the information and meeting the standards for his/her level which then helps formulate a realistic and effective
Figure 1 is a summary of the students’ learning throughout the learning segment. I administrated this test as a pre-assessment prior to the lesson one and administered it again after the completion of lesson 3. This test is a compilation of students’ learning and it demonstration how they met the standards and objectives that were set out for them to achieve. The evaluation criteria in which this assessment and all other assessment in the individual lessons did was not altered. Even though the students have different learning needs, the assessment met all of the needs for all learners.
2:1 Compare the strengths and limitations of assessments of a range of assessment methods with reference to the needs of individual learners. Workplace Observations, question and answer/professional discussions, projects/assignments, portfolios, witness statements. A good assessor will always take into account their learners needs and what particular subject they are studying for prior to confirming with learner type of assessment method to be used. Workplace observations
I incorporate this learned experience daily and learn through each success and discovered area of improvement. Addressing my students needs using a variety of assessment tools has been a beneficial practice to help guide instruction. Students have different learning styles and their strengths and weaknesses are not always apparent using the same methods of assessment. Utilizing formative, standards(goal)-based, anecdotal, observational and benchmarks has driven my instructional programs. The combination of different assessments provides me with a multi-dynamic perspective of my students allowing me to better understand their strengths, weakness and academic needs.
There are 16 types of standardized tests in use today. They are extremely common throughout the United States. These tests are used to measure student’s academic ability and teacher’s teaching skills. Students are taking a standardized test in all grade levels including kindergarten. There is much debate on whether these tests should be banned from schools or kept in place.
There are two types of assessments mentioned in the chapter, Cloze-involving the student’s ability to fill in the blank with
I believe in assessments before during and after instruction. Pre-Assessments are used to know where your students are before instruction. Formal assessments and self-assessments are known as assessment as learning, to recognize student progress during instruction (Witte 2012 p. 38). Summative assessments are known as assessment of learning which lets you know what the students know after instruction (Witte 2012 p. 40). All types of assessment allow the teacher to realze how effective their teaching is and where their students are so they can effectively alter their instruction.
Starting with terms used in class. The first term is assessment, the way that assessment was known in the study was that it was a sort of testing, which in this case was testing social skills in children with ADS. Assessment covered in class is a form of gathering information. An assessment system “is all systematic methods and procedures used to obtain information about students; basis for decisions.” This study was a behavioral assessment which we covered and it falls in formal assessment.
1. B.F. Skinner: Behaviour modification Positive and negative reinforcements or rewards and punishments are used to modify or shape learner’s behaviour. B. F. Skinner’s entire system is based on operant conditioning. The organism is in the process of "operating" on the environment, which in ordinary terms means it is bouncing around its world, doing what it does. During this "operating," the organism encounters a special kind of stimulus, called a reinforcing stimulus, or simply a reinforcer.