In Shakespeare’s Hamlet, Laertes and Fortinbras are two characters that serve as foils for Hamlet. They are minor characters to Hamlet’s main, but are important to understanding Hamlet’s character in the play. Laertes and Fortinbras expose Hamlet’s true nature. Laertes, Fortinbras, and Hamlet are all in similar situations. They have all lost their fathers to murder and want some kind of revenge. The two men serve as foils to Hamlet with respect to their motives for revenge, the way they take action, and their behavior while carrying out their plans. Laertes learns of his father’s death and wants to seek vengeance immediately. He shows that his revenge is to prove his love for his family by saying he will “be revenged Most thoroughly for …show more content…
Hamlet on the other hand acts alone. He has committed himself and no one else to kill Claudius. Laertes allows himself to be manipulated when he confronts Claudius and is angered when asked, “What would you undertake To show yourself in deed your father’s son More than in words?” (Act 4 Scene7, lines 124-126). He is driven to seek revenge on Hamlet and becomes a pawn to Claudius. Fortinbras is manipulated by his uncle when he makes a promise to him in Act 2, scene 2. He “Makes vow before his uncle never more To give th’assy of arms against your Majesty.”, making it impossible to attack Denmark in order to regain his father’s land. Hamlet on the other hand who acts alone is in total control of his situation. He has moments when he acts insane, but he is always aware of what is happening around him, causing him to analyze and over think every little detail of killing his uncle, Claudius. Hamlet realizes the reason he can’t just kill Claudius and get it over with. He wishes that his problem would go away so he doesn’t have to commit murder, but at the same time he understands that he must do what he has
As shown, Laertes is taking his father’s death in a much more decisive stance than Prince Hamlet. Laertes goes straight to the issue and immediately demands vengeance on Claudius, whom he thinks is responsible for Polonius' murder. Laertes is ablaze with motivation and action, and says that he will throw "conscience and grace to the profoundest pit"(IV, v, 130). Unlike Laertes, Prince Hamlet doesn’t take any action when he was first informed about his father's death, which in comparison shows how both Prince Hamlet's and Laertes's personalities are in contrast with each
In Hamlet, there are several characters that are defined to be foils to Hamlet, which is given to Hamlet’s traits of not formulating a structurally sound plan respectively. Some examples of those traits are logical thinking, indecisiveness, and weakness; as such, they altogether identify the tragic nature that Hamlet cannot escape from. Shakespeare characterizes Laertes as a logical person in order to highlight that Hamlet lacks these qualities. Laertes is shown to be like Hamlet because both characters had lost their father by murders and wants to accomplish their goal of taking revenge on the person who had killed their father.
Furthermore, Hamlet kills Polonius out of anger when he believes him to be King Claudius. Overall, Laertes is exceptionally comparable to Hamlet. Laertes’ father was killed by Hamlet; but the two act in completely different ways when they realize their fathers were murdered. While Hamlet is full of self-doubt and conflicting emotions, Laertes is quick to attempt to avenge his father. Laertes immediately jumps to the conclusion that King Claudius is the murderer of his father and he seeks vengeance.
As seen in Act 4 Scene 5, Laertes comes back to Elsinore and is angered with King Claudius over the death of his father, Polonius. Laertes becomes even more furious as he witnessed his sister, Ophelia, acting insane because of the death of their father. Claudius tells Laertes that he has every right to feel the need to avenge his father and convinces him to achieve justice by murdering the person that caused Polonius’ death: Hamlet. Laertes agrees, but much to Claudius’ dismay, at the end of the play during the sword fight in which Laertes fatally wounds Hamlet with poison, Laertes reveals to Hamlet that it was Claudius’ idea to kill him and it was his fault that Gertrude died as it as was Claudius that poisoned the goblet of wine. This revelation is in the following quotation said to Hamlet by Laertes: “Thy mother’s poisoned.
He blames everything on Claudius because he is the one that killed Hamlet’s father and now his mother. This give Hamlet peace about all of the events that have lead to this moment. We should learn from this that revenge in haste can be chaotic and unsuccessful. Revenge may not always be the answer, but if that is what you choose, then it needs to be well thought out and tested for flaws. I think that Laertes got the revenge that he wanted and even though it resulted in his own death as well, he got some closure that he needed.
Laertes was rash and quick to judge. When first coming back to Denmark he had a sword to Claudius’s neck thinking Claudius killed his father. Laertes wanted to see his father’s murder die, so he challenged him to a duel. Laertes poisoned his rapier to make sure it was Hamlet’s last fight. Laertes wanted to kill same as Hamlet.
Within the plot of Hamlet, there are many character foils to express meaning, Hamlet and Fortinbras being one example. The reason Shakespeare chooses to have very similar characters end up in different situations is to express the thought that Hamlet could have ended up a successful character, like Fortinbras, which adds to the element of tragedy. Hamlet’s failure to avenge his father and stay alive to tell the story was procrastinating on his feelings; whereas Fortinbras, a character foil, could have suffered as a result of his father’s murder, but took a deliberate path that ended up to him successfully avenging his father and staying alive. These lead the audience to sympathize with Hamlet and ultimately understand he could have been a successful
Another difference can be seen when Claudius’s reason for killing King Hamlet was so he could take his rightful place on the throne, while Hamlet kills Claudius due to his father's ghosts telling him to do so at the beginning of the play. Where Hamlet and Fortinbras differ is that Hamlet was concerned with his position of the throne and defending his father's glory. Whereas the Fortinbras is concerned with conquering and ruling Denmark. This redeems Hamlet’s character by highlighting his
Each character has an impulse for revenge, but each one reacts in a different manner. Laertes reacts immediately and irrationally. Hamlet procrastinates, muddles through and ponders his fate and does not act until the entire play is over. Fortinbras is in the middle of these two. When his father is killed by King Hamlet, Fortinbras does not act rashly nor does he hesitate and delay his actions.
One similarity that makes Laertes such a good foil to Hamlet is that they both return to Denmark when they have lost a father. However, the sharp contrast in their reaction to these deaths reveals more about Hamlet’s character. Upon returning to
Almost as bad, good mother, As kill a king, and marry with his brother… Thou wretched, rash, intruding fool, farewell! I took thee for thy better. Take thy fortune.” Laertes shows he is impulsive when he says he is going to kill Hamlet with a poisoned sword.
Both Hamlet and Laertes lose their father and end up wanting revenge. When Hamlet finds out that his father was murdered he needs more explanation on how and why. Throughout the whole play he struggles to figure out how he will get his revenge. For Hamlet it takes him the whole to play to finally get his revenge. Laertes however goes into action immediately once he finds out of his father’s death.
Laertes is respected by many for his strong set of morals as well as his belief in justice and honor. He is idealistic and well-meaning (“Hamlet” 3). His character represents the “...embodiment of official duty and obedience...”(Sadowski 9). Hamlet was a long-time friend of Laertes until his sudden descent into fake madness and obsession with revenge which consequently lead to the accidental killing of Polonius that was meant to be Claudius. Later on, after devastating heartbreak and insanity Ophelia mysteriously
Upon learning of the death of his father, stating, “Hadst thou thy wits, and didst persuade revenge/ It could not move thus”, Laertes displays his quickness of temper and lack of deliberate contemplation in his deciding to avenge the death of Polonius as his duty. His immediate thought, to kill or wound the murderer, proves him ill-suited for the act of revenge in comparison to Hamlet, whose depth of reasoning allows him to carefully plot his course of action most efficiently and preserves his best interests
In Shakespeare’s, Hamlet, revenge plays a major role in how the characters act. They base their actions off of getting revenge. Hamlet, Laertes, and Young Fortinbras all are trying to get revenge for their fathers. All three of the characters use different methods for getting revenge and they all get different results. Shakespeare uses these three characters to show that revenge can consume you and that is all that you want and he shows how harmful it can be.