Power/Knowledge Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977. Michel Foucault. New York: Pantheon Books, 1980. 270pp.
Reviewed by Tayyaba Javed. This book ‘’ Power/knowledge Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977’’ is a wonderful and to the point but comprehensive and accomplished introduction to the thought of the French philosopher, a psychologist and a historian Michel Foucault. This book is a compilation of interviews, discussions and lectures, which act as a concrete foundation and a summary to the ideas, Foucault outlined in his major works especially his conception of power which is central to his theory.
The first essay On Popular Justice shows Foucault’s criticism of popular tribunals. His analysis deals with the danger
…show more content…
Three different periods can be detected in his work. I) Archaeological (1950-1960). II) Genealogical (1975-1977). III) Ethical (1978-1987). Focusing mainly on the second and third phase of his career, this book also helps to clarify a lot about his early research .The issue of the power was of great importance in Michel Foucault’s philosophical work. Apart from Marxist interpretation of power relations, he perceives the notion of power not as something that state or institutions possess and use oppressively against individuals, instead for Foucault, power is something that acts and operates in a certain way. Power is more a strategy than a possession, co-extensive with resistance, a dynamic and constructive factor. Hence, Foucault’s idea of power is all- pervasive found in any kind of relation between the members of society. He is interested, not in the conventional treatment of power. But he used it in much more broader terms :‘’ Power must be analyzed as something which circulates, or as something which only functions in the form of a chain . . . Power is employed and exercised through a netlike organization . . . Individuals are the vehicles of power, not its points of …show more content…
This new form of power is known as disciplinary power. Foucault’s idea of subjectification is closely linked to the Bentham’s panpticon; a new kind of prison building in which the prisoners would be unable to know whether they were being examining or not. This notion of authoritative gaze becomes prevalent in society through different institutions. Such kind of gaze also, in a way, becomes a means of looking at ourselves. So, we become a subject of our own gaze and continuously observe our bodies. As a result, power is exerted in the form of self-regulation. In Politics of health in Eighteenth Century, he is of the view that there were two immense methods of power that made the accretion of men possible. First was the privileging of the child and medicalization of the family. Second was the authorization of hygiene and the function of medicine as the policy and system of social
Content Response 1 For centuries, power has been a way of establishing hierarchy and social pyramids that have helped us create the society we live in today. However, we have become more aware of the constant influence that power has in human lives thanks to the perspective of critical theory, which has showed us that power is something that constitutes all of human interactions and relationships. Michel Foucault defines power as a behavior or process that permeates all human interaction (Allen, 2011). He states that power resides in every human encounter for the purpose of transforming structures of communication and meaning. Power is not limited to only a person in a power position, but it is present in any reciprocal relationship.
The first type of power seen in these two works would be the power of government. The second type of power identified would be the power of the people. Within the novel, F451, by Ray Bradbury and the song, “FTP”, by Public Enemy, the power of government is widely
Power is an important part of the world and how it runs, but those who possess it do not always see it this way. Power is an extremely abstract idea. One can find many different variations of the word when asking for a definition person to person. The dictionary simply puts it as, “the capacity or ability to direct or influence the behavior of others…” which is a common theme that could be found between most people’s definitions of the word. We conceive power as a person’s ability to have others listen to him, and, most importantly agree with him.
Power-knowledge refers to the way in which power operates through the production and dissemination of knowledge. In Ashley's case, the criminal justice system produced knowledge about her behavior and mental health issues that were used to justify her prolonged periods of solitary confinement. This knowledge was produced within the context of the culture of control and the new penology, which emphasized punishment and control over care and support. Finally, Foucault's concept of "governmentality" is also relevant to Ashley's case.
But first what is Power? When researching Power words such as authority, control, direct, command and influence all appear. These words all support the following statement “Power is the ability to influence and control the behaviour of others.” The problem with power is that it often leads to those in power abusing it. As Lord Acton famously quoted “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.”
The answer lies in the relationship that sex has with knowledge and power. Focusing on how power controls sex by laying down rules and regulations to follow, he said that power insisted domination and submission. He said power hides its true intentions by calling it beneficial. Foucault argued that we need to develop analytics of power in order to understand sex. He said that westerners think of power as emanating from the law.
Power is the ability to actor do something in a particular way. People who have too much power and abuse it, and turn their power into a negative power. Fear and tyranny are abused by people with power creating a negative effect on society. Leaders with a huge rule of power will abuse their role as a leader by creating a fearful environment.
understand the 'hidden face' of power as in Steven Lukes' (1974) “three faces of power” it is necessary to explore beyond what initially appears from a policy decision or political standpoint. The realms in which the media operate can be quite complex, gauging an understanding to these is essential when trying to understand the various sources of power that the media controls and hence can manipulate. There have been numerous theories and theorists which have been introduced throughout this course regarding various conceptions of power, the 'two faces' view of Bachrach and Baratz (1970) provided the framework for the view on power. However, it was not until Lukes (1974) “three faces of power” theory which expanded on the work of Bachrach and
Firstly the traditional approach. According to Miller, (2015: 118) the traditional approach “considers power to be a relative entity that people or group possess”, which means that each and every individual, group or organization have power within them. Secondly, the symbological approach, which “views power as a product of communicative interactions and relationships” (Mumby, 2014). This means that power emerges through interactions between people or organizations and even so through their relationships, as power is a product of
It also explores how we see the effects of the revolution and its relevance. By drawing on a variety of sources, the paper shows how we relate to the enlightenment concept of humanism. How does The French revolution influence human nature? The French Revolution of 1789 sets itself apart from every revolution that had gone before by being a revolution centered on theories. The French king did not call parliament between 1614 and 1789.
Foucault’s work on asylums and insanity allows for a different and unique take on the evolution of the modern self. In his 1977 work, ‘Discipline and Punish’, Foucault breaks down and analyses the connections that exists between power and knowledge. He examines these connections in relation to those in charge, which due to societal circumstances are deemed in power over the masses as they exert and impress their form of identity onto those over whom they are in control. The social construction of sexuality revitalises an even stronger argument for cultural identity and its link to power and overwhelmingly dominant discourses.
(ii) Power and Conflict: The capacity the one person has the influence over the other persons such that other persons act in accordance with his/her wishes can be defined as ‘Power’. Conflicts could be both positive and negative. Good conflicts could be encouraged but bad conflicts ought to be prevented.
This leads the concepts of power to shift away from theories that associate power with just the economy and the state. It thus moves towards an ideal beneath which power functions at the most micro level of social relations (Gaventa, 2003). This is a pro because instead of ignoring the power hierarchies between individuals and the various power dynamics within society, Foucault essentially focuses on them. Other critiques have failed to mention historical contextualisation and have been inclined to occur in isolation from questions that regard the broader production of knowledge (Hook, 2004). This helps us to understand power relations and hierarchies better within society.
1.2 Power Definition Of Power Power is "The ability to effect the outcomes you want, and if necessary to change the behavior of others in order to make this happen" – Nye We can say that power is about a relationship whose strength and domain will vary with different contexts. Those with more power in a relationship are better placed to make and resist change. Empirical studies have shown that the more powerful are less likely to take on the perspective of others . Power is one of the most important thing to the politic. This is because politik is base on some form of power and its sources may be highly varied and complex .
Power is all over, nobody is either lacking power or outside the restraint of power. It isn’t people who are armed with power; but rather discourse as well as the discursive relations which view and establish people as followers. o To Foucault, a king is the same represented by power as are his followers. As a result power isn’t immovable; power doesn’t advance from a key point. Power can be recognised as a complicated group of dealings at work in a specific location.