Interventionism Swot Analysis

1329 Words6 Pages
CHAPTER ONE AN OVERVIEW OF THE INTERVENTIONIST APPROACH Introduction Interventionism can be defined as a strategic approach, activity which is undertaken by a mighty nation to influence or to manipulate another less powerful one. It is the concept of a government’s interfering in other country’s affairs, in order to help the latter to stabilize and to put out the crisis. Supposedly, an intervention is the democratization of the target countries. A government intervention, as a part of foreign policy, can be applied for various reasons; it can be for a political, economic, religious or humanitarian reason. Frequently, the interventionist leaders resort to such interventions because they believe that they are necessary to recover the violated…show more content…
In its wide meaning, it is the deeds to help the others for several reasons. It is the belief of serving people in time of distress and ordeal that is founded upon the human tendency. Intervention can be defined as the act of interfering by either an individual or an entity with another individual or community, made with a full self-will and choices. It “examines the nature and justifications of interfering with another polity or with choices made by individuals”. One of its main shares is frequently argued to be the government’s intervention. The latter deals with “the justifications of governments to interfere in the lives of its own civilian population- domestic interventions- and the activities of another nations- foreign intervention.” ( It might, also, alter the behavior of an individual or a society; particularly, concerning social and economic difficulties. According to the Cambridge dictionary, it is “the government actions to influence the way financial markets or particular industries…show more content…
Like any other kind of intervention, humanitarian intervention is the involvement of a country in another country to maintain peace and to fix the conflict in the target country. In this case, the interventionist government resort to the use of the military forces and sometimes might use the army forces. Interventionist leaders argue that a humanitarian intervention is an ultimatum of an “armed” intervention in another state where they believe that the human rights are infringed. It can be defined as the act of advocating and saving oppressed people in other nations. It is commonly justified by the incapability of the target government to safeguard its people. (Oxford Public International Law) The humanitarian intervention is characterized mainly by the nature of the actions that the government can do. Among these actions are “humanitarian aids” and “sanctions of various kinds”. It is known as “humanitarian war” since it is often achieved through the use of the army forces by a government in a foreign government in order to redeem people from an unwelcomed catastrophe. (Internet Encyclopedia of

More about Interventionism Swot Analysis

Open Document