Internet and Privacy
1.0 Introduction
Privacy is not a new concept. It existed before the era of the current telecommunications networks and technologies (Tavani, 1999). Privacy is a natural action or reaction of individuals as one of their rights in public (Lin and Loui, 1998).
For example, sealing an envelope or closing the door reminds us of privacy (Stefik,
1999). The evolving and rapid advancement of new technologies such as the telecommunication networks and in particular, the Internet, especially, after BernersLee presented a project in 1991 to permit links to be created to any information anywhere, are known today as the “WorldWideWeb (WWW)” (Rhyno, 2003). The use of the Internet has increased rapidly. The Internet is now considered
…show more content…
The privacy concerns of Internet users have increased and the signs of these concerns started to appear from the middle of the 1990s after the commercial development of the WWW browser in 1994 (Kruck et al., 2002). This essay is going to present the meaning of privacy and the implications of it for Internet users. Also, this essay will demonstrate some of the issues that are presented in the literature, as well as exploring different authors’ perspectives on Internet and Privacy concerns. 2.0 What is Privacy
There are lots of authors who have attempted to define privacy in the literature, and theories covering several privacy issues have presented privacy as non- intrusion, the control of information, and restricted access, along with other issues. However, the concept of privacy is hard to understand and is not easy to define (Tavani, 1999), because this concept is linked with several dimensions such as the personal body, personal behaviour and currently, personal communications and personal information
(Clarke, 1999). These dimensions are governed by certain laws and policies which form the dimensions based in these laws and policy legislations.
3
The literature presents several definitions for the meaning of privacy. For
…show more content…
3.0 Internet and Privacy
After exploring some of the above privacy definitions, this section will present the meaning of the expression, Internet privacy. Tavani (1999) pointed out that some scholars confine the expression, Internet privacy, to the issues that are connected to privacy concerns which are connected with user activities during the use of the
Internet.
Although there are several aspects of privacy, privacy issues associated with the use of the Internet are most likely appointed under communications privacy, involving the user of the Internet’s personal information and activities, and the disclosure of them online (Paine et al., 2006a).
It is worth noting that the activities using the Internet are not only associated with entering personal information by the Internet user online, such as in purchasing online or in applying for a job, or for some other purpose, but also in surfing the Web, for instance, using a search engine like Google or visiting any Web site that sheds any visitor with what are commonly known as cookies, which silently collect information about the visitor (Lin and Loui, 1998; Tavani, 1998). This is considered to be releasing personal information and these personal transactions have caused a rise
Seeing on how the internet has expanded far beyond the level of education and communicating through web to web. We can say, the internet is changing for the better for us. Not like Nicholas Carr, who may feel uncomfortable getting lost in the web than this younger generation, who will more likely ever know the web is suited extensiveness. At first, when looking at the
Nowadays, “privacy” is becoming a popular conversation topic. Many people believe that if they do not do anything wrong in the face of technology and security, then they have nothing to hide. Professor Daniel J. Solove of George Washington University Law School, an internationally known expert in privacy law, wrote the article Why Privacy Matters Even if You Have ‘Nothing to Hide’, published in The Chronicle of Higher Education in May of 2011. Solove explains what privacy is and the value of privacy, and he insists that the ‘nothing to hide’ argument is wrong in this article. In the article, “Why Privacy Matters Even if You Have ‘Nothing to Hide’”, Daniel J. Solove uses ethos, pathos, and logos effectively by using strong sources, using
“Black Code: Surveillance, Privacy, and the Dark Side of the Internet,” written by Ronald J. Deibert, outlines different issues and benefits that have arised due to the growing use of the internet. Deibert begins his essay providing information about the internet such as the rapid growth of smartphones, how the internet has taken over most of societies lives, and key differences between previous technological innovations compared to the internet. He continues his essay by discussing the U.S.A. Patriot Act and how this law should be retracted based on the fact that various companies, like Google, can give the government our personal searches if they ask. Then, he talks about various types of cyber crimes and how we need stronger regulations to control the internet so these crimes would not be possible. Deibert concludes his essay explaining how the internet has provided many benefits in today’s nation, but the internet needs stricter regulations for our own protection.
Better Learning Through Modern Technology In his article, “Does the Internet Make You Dumber?” Nicholas Carr explains that the Internet is harming us, turning us into brainless zombies. When used strictly for entertainment purposes, yes it can be. When used to teach and learn, it is a very useful tool.
The “Nothing-to-Hide Argument” Analyzed: In this rhetorical analysis, I will be taking a look at Daniel J. Solove’s essay “The Nothing-to-Hide Argument,” which is about privacy in the context of personal information and government data collection (Solove 734). Solove’s main argument in his essay is that the general public has a narrow perception of what privacy really is. The purpose behind his main argument is to expose the problems with the nothing-to-hide argument while presenting a way to challenge it for his target audience, government officials. Solove’s argument to his target audience is effective through his exemplary use of substance, organization, and style in his essay.
Regardless of the genre, authors write because they have an exigency, or an urgency that motivates them to make their claim. For instance, law reviews and op-eds (“opposite the editorials”) are both genres that provide new information and new perspectives on a certain subject to the readers. However, there are major differences in what readers acquire from these papers, as demonstrated by examining Warren and Brandeis’s “The Right to Privacy” and Solove’s¬ “Five Myths”. Both of these pieces tackle the issue of privacy.
A book by Priscilla M. Regan: “Legislating Privacy”, explains how deep the concept of privacy can create beyond the vacancy of public pressure between individuals and society. “When viewed as a fundamental right, privacy can be interpreted as being involved in a range of constitutional and moral issues — freedom from surveillance and searches, reproductive freedom, freedom to associate, confidentiality of communications, and family values.” (Regan 48). According to Reagan's statement, privacy is a sensitive topic when approached from many different angles. The constitution and moral issues as Reagan discuss is directly cohesive to the case of the Minnesota school district.
The Internet is used worldwide and supplies all the information we could ever want to access, but behind the glittering front the Internet presents, there are troubles and conflicts. Today the Internet is used, but not all the users are aware of how controlling the Internet is over them. The Internet consumes time out of millions of lives everyday because the wonders of technology so easily
Introduction Are you an everyday internet user? If so I strongly suggest carefully reading and examining this topic. The internet is a vast place. It is a very useful tool, as it has become the primary source of our knowledge.
DNA Profiling antithetical to right to privacy. INTRODUCTION The ambit of privacy can get to the extent of your saliva, spit or anything from which your DNA can be traced down. These mentioned things are unintentionally thrown by us and definitely abandoned by us without having any idea of its further use.
Liberal associate justice of the Supreme Court, William J. Brennan Jr. said, “If the right to privacy means anything, it is the right of the individual, married or single, to be free from unwarranted governmental intrusion.” The great debate circling the minds of many individuals in the U.S. , what’s more important, our privacy or national security? In my perspective, privacy is more significant. Privacy can be defined in Constitutional Law as, “the right of people to make personal decisions regarding intimate matters; under the Common Law, the right of people to lead their lives in a manner that is reasonably secluded from public scrutiny, whether such scrutiny comes from a neighbor 's prying eyes, an investigator 's eavesdropping ears, or
Technology is growing at a fast pace and every day we see a new product or service that is available. Many times it is hard to even keep up with the latest phone, computer, game console, or software. There are so many different gadgets to choose from and even the internet is on information overload. As a result, we can no longer truly expect to have privacy.
"While the Internet-based economy provides many benefits, it also raises new concerns for maintaining the privacy of information. “Internet privacy is the privacy and security level of personal data published via the Internet. It is a broad term that refers to a variety of factors, techniques and technologies used to protect sensitive and private data, communications, and preferences.â€[1] As the federal government’s National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA)[2] explains: Every day, billions of people around the world use the Internet to share ideas, conduct financial transactions, and keep in touch with family, friends, and colleagues. Users send and store personal medical data, business communications, and even intimate conversations over this global network.
In terms of information privacy, it depicts the utility function of information disclosure as the difference between expected benefits (such as monetary incentive and personalized service) and expected costs (such as consumer privacy concerns and risks), and suggests an optimal or equilibrium point between the two, which determines the amount of information the person is willing to
The right to privacy is not only a human right but an element to various legal traditions which may restrain both government and private party action that threaten the privacy of an individual The fourth, fifth and the ninth amendment protect our right to privacy. Today our privacy is being threaten due to the growing issues that threaten our national security. With growing amount of terrorist attacks, bombings, school shooting, and other massive shootings it definitely seems to warrant the loss of privacy. However, how far is too far and who decides?