ipl-logo

What Is Myers III V. State Of Indiana An Example Of Mental Competency?

1528 Words7 Pages

In the field of criminal law there is a certain type of criminal defense that comes to the court and has a low success rate. These cases concern the mental capacity of the defendant and if they have enough mental capacity, or are sane enough, to be aware of their crime and consequences of crime. The insanity defense is extremely rare because of how difficult it is for the defense to prove to the court and jury that the defendant did not have the mental capacity to understand what they did wrong and the consequences from it. The case of Myers III v. State of Indiana is one example of criminal responsibility and mental capacity. This case has information that can be connected to the textbook with the insanity defense tests, mental competence …show more content…

Mental competency is critical for court because if someone, like Myers, was determined to not be mental competent then the trial will be placed on hold for days or months or years until another psychological evaluation brings results that the individual has the mental capacity to understand the legal proceedings and consult with the defense attorney to help their case (Samaha, 2019, p. 211). In court, the jury was informed about Myers' history with mental illness and when it came time for deliberations the jury ruled that Myers was guilty of his crime but mentally ill. This conviction led to one main question for the insanity defense, and that was whether the mental illness that Myers suffered from prevented him from understanding the wrongfulness of his crime (Samaha, 2019, p. 215). After looking at the textbook and the case, there could be an argument that Myer’s mental illness did prevent him from knowing the wrongfulness of his crime because of how his chronic disorder of paranoid schizophrenia twists what is real and what is not real. At the time of the crime, Myer may not have known that what he was doing was actually real and he may not have thought that it was wrong because it was not real. This would be sufficient evidence to answer the main question for the insanity

Show More
Related

  • Examples Of Not Guilty By Reason Of Insanity

    641 Words  | 3 Pages

    Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity (NGRI) is a form of insanity defense that allows for an individual to not be found guilty of a crime due to a mental defect or disease that results in a lack of mens rea, or the capability to intentionally commit a crime. However, simply having a mental illness or defect does not guarantee that an offender will be found NGRI. Not only would a defendant have to have a major or severe mental illness or disease, but the defendant would have to prove that their condition impaired them so greatly as to not have any control over their behavior or any concept that they had done anything wrong at the time of the offense. Although Bob undoubtedly had a diminished capacity for logic and reason in this case, the example as given does not provide enough detail to determine the nature of Bob’s personality or his potential motives in committing this crime. Nevertheless, there is one major flaw to Bob’s insanity defense: he tried to hide the crime.

    Read More

  • Insanity In Delaware Case Study

    706 Words  | 3 Pages

    Since Howard knew it was criminally wrong, would not pass the statement of “appreciate the wrongfulness”. Within the boundaries of the ALI test, Howard does not meet the legal terms for insanity because he failed to cognitive and volitional prongs.

    Read More

  • Andrea Yates Case

    950 Words  | 4 Pages

    At the 2002 trial, Yates pleaded not guilty, by using the insanity defense. The insanity defense argues that an individual should not be found guilty of a crime if they have a persistent psychiatric disease at the time the crime was committed. It was proved that Yates could tell right from wrong, so she did not meet the definition of the insanity in Texas (Walsh). The jury deliberated for almost four hours, and finally found Yates guilty. The jury rejected her insanity defense, and Yates was sentenced to life in prison.

    Read More

  • Ayla Case Law Essay

    1864 Words  | 8 Pages

    Before the court can evaluate the specific details of this section, they must first re-define what a mental disorder is based on case laws. There are three crucial cases which contributed in shaping the definition of a mental disorder: Cooper v. R., R. v. Bouchard-Lebrun, and R. v. Stone cases. In Cooper v. R. (1980), Justice Dickson defines disease of the mind— also known as mental disorder— as the following: ...“[D]isease of the mind” embraces any illness, disorder or abnormal condition which impairs the human mind and its functioning… [where of] such intensity as to render the accused incapable of appreciating the nature and quality of the violent act or of knowing that it is

    Read More

  • FRE 704 V PA Rules Of Evidence

    547 Words  | 3 Pages

    Those matters are for the trier of fact alone. Id. In this criminal case a mental health expert is prepared to offer an opinion on the whether the defendant was insane

    Read More

  • Andrea Yates Murder Case Essay

    1867 Words  | 8 Pages

    It lists that in order to declare a defendant not guilty by insanity, it must be proven that the person is significantly mentally ill and was not able to differentiate right from wrong in the instance of their crime (Levin). There was no dispute between prosecution or defense that Andrea was mentally ill, it was simply if her illness inhibited her judgement enough to meet the legal standards. Her family and defense attorney all believed that there was no questioning the severity of her condition, she simply could not function as a regular human being, and her judgement was clouded. Andrea’s mother-in-law, Dora Yates, who frequently watched over Andrea and witnessed her daily condition, stated, “I don't think she knew how to cope . . . how to function.

    Read More

  • The Significance Of Brain Scans In The Courtroom By Andreas Kuersten

    1025 Words  | 5 Pages

    By claiming insanity a defendant has stated that he or she did not know the action was wrong and could not fully comprehend the results of this action. Kuersten then supplies the reader with more details of a particular case, the Reagan shooting, by stating how the depositions from a Neurologists and a Psychiatrist's benefited the case, permitting the judge and jury to have a more scientific understanding of the evidence. “The shooter’s brain has relatively enlarged sulci and ventricles, signifying shrinkage and decay. A psychiatrists testifies that these characteristics are associated with Schizophrenia.” With this knowledge about the defendant's brain jurors may be leaning towards the insanity plea with sympathetic views towards the defendant's actions.

    Read More

  • Was Mr. Smith Committed The Legal Definition Of Insanity?

    970 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the trial of Mr. Smith, there is no question of whether or not he committed the gruesome murder of Mr. Johnson; the question is in the sanity of Mr. Smith at the time the murder was committed. You may be thinking, “Why on Earth would you think Mr. Smith was sane? He killed a man because his eye was creepy!” While Mr. Smith did kill someone for what seems like an absurd reason, this does not make him insane. The legal definition of insanity is “a mental illness of such a severe nature that a person cannot distinguish fantasy from reality, cannot manage his/her own affairs, or is subject to uncontrollable impulsive behavior....

    Read More

  • The Insanity Verdict On Trial By Scott O. Lilienfeld

    1669 Words  | 7 Pages

    Unlike serial killers with psychopathy they manipulate the system to benefit their own means to an end. Allowing this disorder to fall into the insanity defense would feed into their disorder in that it would allow for the manipulation of the system to

    Read More

  • Insanity Defense Reform

    92 Words  | 1 Pages

    In refers to class discussion, as a result of the M’Nagthen case, the Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984 (IDRA) is only use when the defendant does not understand the nature of the crime committed. Therefore, although neurosis or personality disorders qualify as a mental disease according to the DSM-5; the law has eliminated these types of disorders from being utilized in courts as a form of defense. The law has also excluded the irresistible impulse or inabilities to comply with the rules as a means of defense in the federal

    Read More

  • The Case Of Andrea Yates

    1523 Words  | 7 Pages

    “It was discovered that one psychiatrist, Park Dietz, had given testimony that turned out to be untrue. He had claimed that Yates got her idea to drown the children from an episode of Law and Order. It turned out that he had confused the plots of multiple episodes” (Andrea Yates, 2021). It was during this trial that Andrea Yates was found not guilty by the reason of insanity and was sent to a maximum-security state mental facility. The M'Naghten Rule, which states “all defendants are presumed to be sane unless they can prove that–at the time of committing the criminal act–the defendant’s state of mind caused them to (1) not know what they were doing when they committed said act, or (2) that they knew what they were doing, but did not know that it was wrong”

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Insanity Defense

    1470 Words  | 6 Pages

    This reasoning is based on willful intent, which is very essential to an insane person. This means they cannot form such intent. However, mental disease does not stand for legal insanity. The burden of proof is on the defendant to prove his insanity. This defense allows a mentally ill defendant to evade prison on the assumption that they were not in control of their actions Many critics of this defense argue that many defendants use it to escape justice.

    Read More

  • Miller V. State: Insanity

    350 Words  | 2 Pages

    When it comes to the case Miller V. State, I believe that trial court refused to give the jury instructions regarding the insanity defense, which the defendant wished to have comunicated, because they wanted the jury to be able to decide imoartially. Miller was examined by three medical experts and they concluded that Miller satisfied the M'naughten insanity test when he stabbed Goring. The district court had instructed the jury to determine whether Miller was actually legally insane when he stabbed Goring. They wanted the jury to find proof of insanity at that time, and to also consider Miller's mental condition "before and after the killing to throw light on what Miller's mental condition was at the time of the killing" (Schmalleger

    Read More

  • Andrea Yates Case Essay

    2011 Words  | 9 Pages

    For Dena Schlosser, the issue of insanity was less clear. In Schlosser’s first trial, the jury ended up deadlocked as to whether or not Schlosser was legally insane under the Texas insanity defense law. Similarly, in the second trial, the defense and prosecution let the judge decide the verdict, which was not guilty by reason of insanity, and it was revealed that Schlosser had a brain tumor, which could have led to her religious delusions telling her to cut off her baby’s arms, fatally injuring the daughter (New York Times). In the simpler case of Deanna Laney, Laney suffered religious delusions that led her to crush her sons’ skull with rocks, and the expert witness, Park Dietz, said, “Laney didn’t realize her actions were wrong, which means she was legally insane under Texas Law” (NBC). All five psychiatric experts in the trial said Laney qualified as insane under the Texas due to a “severe mental illness [that] caused Laney to have psychotic delusions that rendered her incapable of knowing right from wrong during the killings” (USA TODAY).

    Read More

  • Jeffrey Dahmer Research Papers

    1103 Words  | 5 Pages

    Many doctors and jurors pointed out good characteristics Dahmer showed in court, and focused on his possible “...mental illness, treatment needs, and prognoses….”(Ullman). “Dahmer’s lawyer…and … Milwaukee District Attorney…” needed to deny their disgust of Dahmer and the deterioration the city had endured due to his deeds (Ullman). Groups orientated around mental health and legal matters recorded pieces of Jeffrey’s trial in order to teach about “mental illness and the insanity defense”(Ullman). Another Dahmer apologist had

    Read More

More about What Is Myers III V. State Of Indiana An Example Of Mental Competency?

Open Document