Plato was a philosopher that was born in Athens in 428 BC. He was a follower and student of the philosopher Socrates and later became the teacher of philosopher Aristotle. When Plato was 40 years old, he founded a school called the Academy and it was considered to be the first university of higher education. I believe that he was one of the most important and influential figures in Western Philosophy. There are a couple of Plato’s philosophies that I completely agree with because they still correspond with me in today 's world.
One thing that caught my attention the most with Plato’s philosophies was with his view of the structure of the soul. He believed that the structure of the soul was split into three parts, which are desire, the spirit, and reason and believed that they create the perfect harmony of the soul. The first part of the structure is desire which is what motivates the soul to do what the appetite craves, the second one is the spirit which drives the soul to do what is good and lastly, reason which is what guides the soul to make the right decisions. I completely agree with him here because I know everytime I go out shopping, I use this. For example, I go to the store for what I need and then I pass by something that I wanted. I have the desire to get the item but then the spirit guides me to go into the
…show more content…
Most of the philosophers that we have covered throughout the semester has always had something different to say about Gods or had a philosophy about one or many. Another thing that I like about Plato is that he always has a way of explaining his philosophies like Chariot story with the structure of the soul or the ladder of love. I believe that Plato is is one of the most important philosopher in the Western philosophy because of how he tries to get out peoples own knowledge and have them think on their own like his past teacher
His one of his greatest pupil was Plato he wrote the book “Republic.” In which he wrote about how justice who affect society or the country in better ways than other and how it is the building blocks of things. HIs pupil was Aristotle was the author of a philosophical and scientific system who helped create christian Scholasticism and medieval Islamic philosophers. Those where only some of the
Socrates contended that our immortal souls, which reside in the ideal spiritual realm, are pulled into the physical realm by human bodies. However, Socrates claimed that reason is an effective tool that our souls could use in the physical realm to communicate with our imperfect bodies. Because our spirits and bodies come from different realms, it would be difficult for them to connect fully without reason. Socrates' concept of dualism brought in a new era in philosophy, and his achievements and contributions to philosophy will never be
In the Republic, Plato gives an argument saying the soul is immortal. In this paper I will present his argument and show that his argument is invalid. I will show why the conclusion is not true and restate the argument to make it valid to help with Socrates’ claim. Plato’s argument on why the soul is immortal: 1. Something can only be destroyed by the thing that is bad for it.
Plato’s Allegory of the cave represents life/death/rebirth. Life/death/rebirth is a popular archetype that most authors use in fictional books. Plato’s Allegory of the cave begins with people that are locked in chains inside of a cave. The people inside the cave see shadows on the wall of animals and creatures that they think represents their life. This cave is an illusion of life that the people are experiencing.
Plato creates a whitewashed image of Socrates, completely undermining the image presented in Aristophanes Clouds. As compared to Aristophanes' clouds, Plato portrays Socrates as wise, humble and sophisticated. Plato was a student of Socrates, whereas Aristophanes was a comic writer and a friend. The original Socrates is unknown, therefore we can only evaluate what others have written about him. Aristophanes writings seems to be a reflection of the public opinion.
It never changes and yet causes the essential nature of things we perceive in the world. These two perceptions are what Plato describes as the divided line or the journey of self discovery. This progression of the spirit, that can never be reached, becomes the ideal. Plato’s discussions include the involvement of the soul. It is clear, that the main reason for dealing with the soul is to achieve this state
aligns with reason and resists the desires of the appetite. It is in this part of the soul where the courage to be good is found. In the unjust soul, the spirit ignores reason and instead aligns with the appetitive desires, manifesting as the demand for the pleasures of the body. Plato asserts that the wise and just soul allows reason to govern the other parts, while the unwise and unjust soul allows conflict between the parts.12 Just as there is the appetitive part of the soul—the largest part of the soul—there is the productive class, or the workers, who have souls of bronze and account for the largest part of the population.13 This class includes the general population of laborers, plumbers, masons, carpenters, merchants, and farmers.
Why do we exist? When was the start of the humanity? Not all the questions we had, have a concrete answer. But the philosophy will respond to all the question. For the philosophers there is an answer for all.
In The Republic, Plato writes about his thoughts on good, justice, and how we can achieve it. He starts off by stating that for human happiness and to live the best life philosopher-kings are needed. Not everyone can become a philosopher; certain people simply are non-philosophers also called lovers of sights and sounds. Plato makes the distinction between lovers of wisdom(philosophers) and lovers of sights and sounds clear using beauty as an example. Non-philosophers see ''fine tones and colours and forms and all the artificial products that are made out of them''(476b) but are unable to see or to understand absolute beauty.
Essay To what extent could Plato’s Republic be or not be justifiably characterized as a closed and authoritarian society without freedom? To begin with I'd like to say that Plato was the greatest ancient Greek philosopher of those times. He was born sometime around 427 BC in Athens, Greece.
When he was young he studied music and poetry. According to Aristotle, Plato developed the foundations of his metaphysics and epistemology by studying the doctrines of Cratylus, and the work of Pythagoras and
Plato is best known for his poetic and rhetoric attributes Aristotle's earlier philosophical works in poetry discusses "dramatic" dialogues, that are constructed poetically, which branch into self-inflicted corruption as poetry reveals its audience. It is suggested that perhaps 'the republic'(italics) is directed at poetry, which identifies a clear contrast between philosophy and poetry that projects rivalry. -Plato can write philosophy that in some ways are perceived as poetry. - Plato's dialogues present a continuing conflict between philosophy, rhetoric and sophistry. - Plato assimilates Poets as "rhetoricians" in Gorgias 502c, although it is said to be a questionable measure amongst
It is important they are listed in that order, when discussing Plato’s philosophy, because that is, too, the order of their importance. Identical to the nature of justice, the individual soul, is hierarchical as well: the appetite is inferior to the spirit, which is inferior to the rational. Yet each plays a vital role in the composition of the soul. In theory, reason should oversee the individual, but the appetites must also to an extent be noted if the person’s soul is to be harmonious and not in conflict with itself. And if every aspect of the soul accomplishes its task well, or fittingly, the result is a moderate and ordered state of affairs within oneself.
Joseph Daunis Three Classes and the Soul In Book IV of Plato’s The Republic, Socrates draws a comparison between the classes evident in their fictional city to the human soul. Socrates clearly defines the three forms he finds in the city as being the appetites of mankind, or in other words, all human desires, such as pleasure, comforts, and physical satisfaction. The second form discussed by Socrates is the spirit or the component of the soul which deals with anger and perceptions of injustice. The third and final form is the mind or reason, which analyzes and rationally weighs options and solutions to problems. Socrates compares these three forms of the soul to the three classes in the city: producers, auxiliaries, and guardians.
Beaujorne Sirad A. Ramirez PHILO 201 The Soul and The Philosopher (Parts 1 and 2) Phaedo is also known as “On the Soul” by many Ancient commentators and readers. In this work, Socrates was having his last words before his impending death. In the opening of the dialogue, Echecrates asks Phaedo what transpired when Socrates drank the hemlock.