The Constitution--- Equality For All
I believe that Beard’s and Roche’s opinions on the Constitution differed greatly. Beard wrote that the Founding Fathers wanted to benefit themselves and protect their property. At the same time, Roche wrote that the Founding Fathers wanted to create a compromise between the large and small states and make them equal. I agree with Roche because I also believe the Founding Fathers wanted to create a government based on equality.
The Constitution, written in 1787, is a document considered the supreme law of the land in the United States. It is a source of power but also provides restrictions which protect the United States citizens. A convention was held which developed three branches of government and a checks and balances system. The Founding Fathers could not agree on the Virginia Plan or the New Jersey Plan, so they decided on the Great Compromise, which included portions of both plans.
…show more content…
Roche says the Founding Fathers did not only care about the states, but also the world around them. Roche states that the Founding Fathers were concerned with world issues, “…were compelled to listen to the reports of Secretary John Jay and to the dispatches and pleas from their frustrated envoys in Britain, France, and Spain” (paragraph 8). The Founding Fathers wanted equality for all the states in the Union. Roche uses a quote from the Constitution stating that the Founding Fathers wanted all thirteen states to be completely equal, “…that a map of the U.S. be spread out, that all the existing boundaries be erased, and that a new partition of the whole be made into 13 equal parts” (paragraph
I Agree… “The Federalist No. 84” and “The Anti-Federalist No.84”, both have their views on what should happen to our government. Whether it is to add a bill of rights or not, but I agree with the writer of “The Federalist No.84” because if the Constitution is adopted, then it will be our Bill of Rights, also based on other countries’ bill of rights then it may argue with a semblance of reason. Because I have read both sides of the discussion, I can see who is wrong and why.
What was Charles Beard’s view of the Constitution? How does that view compare to the traditional secondary school textbook view? Be specific. Beard’s view of the Constitution was that it was made by people in the upper and middle classes in order to create a strong federal government that could be used to their advantage. He stated how this would help them since a strong federal government could be used to force the lower classes to pay more money while the upper classes received power and protection.
Charles Beard interprets the constitution of the United States in an economic manner. Beard claims certain personal interests among individuals such as money, public securities, and trade carried out the movement for the constitution. Beards hypothesis says merchants, manufacturers, shippers, and financiers would be in support of the constitution whereas non-slaveholding farmers and debtors would be in opposition of the constitution. For example, according to the article “An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States” by Charles Beard, beard states “Would it not be pretty conclusively demonstrated that our fundamental law was not the product of an abstraction known as “the whole people,” but of a group of economic interests
The purpose of the Constitution was to establish a central government authorized to deal directly with individuals rather than states and to incorporate a system of checks and balances that would preserve the fundamental concepts contained in the Magna Carta, that is, to limit the power of the government. The first three articles of the Constitution establish the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government and the country’s system of checks and balances. The balance of power was established vertically through the separation of power between the federal government and the states and laterally through the three branches. In the supremacy clause, the constitution declared itself the supreme law of the land. The U.S. Constitution
-The Louisiana Purchase caused formation of new states, access to the Mississippi river system,increase in geographic and scientific knowledge, increased conflict with american indians, and it added more territory to the U.S. . Louisiana Purchase and Exploration The Constitution affected the Louisiana purchase because of the Purchase's constitutionality "Nowhere does the Constitution authorize the executive branch of the government to spend public funds to expand the boundaries of the nation. " This was a problem for Thomas Jefferson since he was after all elected by a "political philosophy that emphasized small government, low taxes, and "strict construction" of the Constitution"In conclusion by Jefferson's many ways technically the Louisiana purchase could
1. In Federalist Paper 10, Madison expressed concerns about factions and his desire to protect the minority (people with land) from the majority (those without). He stated that a large republic should be created so that tiny factions interest groups will have a difficult time uniting and becoming a majority that usurps the minority. Do you think this theory has withstood the test of time? Discuss instances in which it has/has not.
Hence Federalists came up with the Bill of Rights as a way to get the Constitution ratified and for people to really see a needed change. The Bill Of Rights which lists specific prohibitions on governmental power, lead the Anti-Federalists to be less fearful of the new Constitution . This guaranteed that the people would still remain to have rights, but the strong central government that the country needed would have to be approved. The 1804 Map of the nation shows that even after the ratification of the United States Constitution there still continued to be “commotion” and dispute in the country.(Document 8) George Washington stated that the people should have a say in the nation and government and everything should not be left to the government to decide.(Document 3) Although George Washington was a Federalist many believed he showed a point of view that seemed to be Anti-Federalists. Many believed that The Bill of Rights needed to be changed and modified and a new document’s time to come into place.
Under the Constitution, states and the government both have different duties and both shared large responsibilities. When events such as Shay’s Rebellion occurred, the lack of national power prevented quick and efficient responses to problems in the nation. These issues highlighted the inefficiency of the Articles of Confederation and the need for a national army that could quickly resolve issues. Each state was dealing with its own problems and searching for its own solutions. As Abraham Lincoln later said, “A house divided against itself cannot stand.”
Nothing is more basic than the set of laws and rights that U.S. Constitution provides for us as Americans. But very few people know where the Founding Fathers actually got their inspiration. Contrary to popular belief, the U.S. constitution was heavily influenced by an old Indian Confederacy born in the mid-16th century. This confederation, however, is the mighty Iroquois Nation, who has been living by their own constitution, unified in peace, for over 800 years. The founding fathers were brilliant men, and yes, they were very intelligent, but they did not just pull words out of their rear ends and write it down on a piece of paper.
In his essay ‘The founding fathers: a reform caucus in action', John P. Roche describes the Founding Fathers as practical politicians that were indeed acting on behalf the citizens they represented. Roche states the founding fathers kept in mind everyone's rights while making the Constitution. He explains how James Madison drafted the Virginia Plan. Roche describes it as a ‘Political Masterstroke'.
The U.S. endorse the U.S. constitution in 1789, much of the time has been utilized as a model by rising countries. A constitution is the basic law of a state or nation that outlines the primary structure and functions of government. State constitutions, nonetheless, sometimes appreciate such esteem. Most definitely, the constitution of the state of Texas is more frequently disparaged than applauded in view of its length, indefinite quality, and its obsolete, unworkable arrangements. The political conditions that encompassed the written work of the national constitution varied impressively from those that existed at the times when large portions of the fifty states were composing their constitutions.
The United States Constitution is the supreme law of the United States of America. The Constitution is the outline our founding fathers created to describe the nature and functions of government. Its first three articles consist of a doctrine of the separation of powers, which divides the federal government into three branches: the legislative, consisting of Congress; the executive, consisting of the President; and the judicial, consisting of the Supreme Court and other federal courts. The constitution is meant to govern the federal government while the bill of rights is meant to govern the
I was fascinated to learn that the individual states viewed themselves as distinct nations. This unfortunately contributed to the incredibly weak Articles of Confederation. This first constitution of sorts aligned the nation states in a “league of friendship” rather than a country of states. The video explains that the founders were wary of creating a strong federal government lest it result in an absolute abuse of power by a central figure, much like the government they had just successfully
The Constitution is rules for the president and all of the United States politicians to govern by. In the constitution the first part is called the preamble. It states “ we the people in order to form a more perfect union. established justice ensure domestic tranquility. Provide for the common defense ,promote the general welfare and secure the blessings to ourselves and our posterity.
The Constitution was created by the Founding Fathers in order to lay a foundation on which to build a government. The constitution essentially gives instructions on what the government can and cannot do, while also serving as sort of a road map to help the government navigate through different situations. When creating the constitution, the Founding Fathers wanted to make a strong central government but feared that one day the government might become too strong like Britain did, leading up to the American Revolution. So, in order to set limits on the national government they broke it up into three branches, The Judicial Branch, The Legislative Branch, and The Executive Branch. Each branch has some way to keep the others in check, this is called the Checks and Balances.